Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />660 <br /> <br />COPEIA, 1989, NO.3 <br /> <br />trait. Sokal and Rohlf (1980) extrapolated fur- <br />ther by stating that the trait was, in fact, irre- <br />spective of variables such as age, sex, race, ex- <br />perience, or even field of specialization. <br />Individuals untrained in the complexities of <br />taxonomic evaluation (to include children) did <br />as well in phenetically grouping Caminalcules <br />as did trained systematists. <br />Does this mean that Rafinesque (1820) erred <br />in the introductory pronouncement, which ex- <br />tolled "seeing well" as "a high faculty of the <br />mind"? We argue to the contrary. The "art of <br />seeing well" (sensu Rafinesque) requires not <br />necessarily a "high faculty of the mind," but <br />instead innately human traits like perseverence <br />and discipline. All humans apparently have the <br />capability to group organisms and objects using <br />shape and size parameters, but many would elect <br />not to do so based upon a personal lack of per- <br />severence and diligence required by such tasks. <br />These factors may be critical in promoting the <br />trained eye of a systematist. <br />Results of our investigations impinge heavily <br />on the complex program to preserve and man- <br />age endangered fishes in the Colorado River <br />(USFWS, 1987c), a program that involves state, <br />federal, private, and academic groups. Deep, <br />emotionally-charged issues which sustain and <br />occasionally divide these groups range from <br />water-rights acquisition to field identification of <br />species. With regard to the last issue, our results <br />indicate that qualitative features of certain phe- <br />notypic regions are adequate to distinguish at <br />least two different species, G. robusta and the <br />endangered G. cypha, occurring syntopically in <br />the Yampa River. Our investigation unequiv- <br />ocally demonstrates that this relatively undis- <br />turbed reach of stream is important habitat for <br />G. 0pha. Efforts in 1987 produced 8.9% G. cypha <br />(32 of 358 total specimens of Gila collected), in <br />a variety of sizes and of both sexes in repro- <br />ductive condition. Unfortunately, no G. elegans <br />was collected, so the use of qualitative charac- <br />ters could not be tested on a multi-species group, <br />nor are we able to comment on status of bony tail <br />in the study area other than to further attest to <br />its rarity. <br />Identification of G. cypha and its absolute and <br />relative abundance serve to demonstrate that <br />the lower Yampa River represents a relatively <br />pristine example of what was once the entire <br />Colorado River basin (Fradkin, 1984). As such, <br />it may well represent one of the last opportu- <br />nities for the system's native fishes to survive, <br /> <br />as also indicated by the presence of well docu- <br />mented spawning grounds for the endangered <br />Colorado squawfish (Pt)'chocheilus lucius) (Tyus, <br />1986), occurrences of razorback suckers (X)'- <br />rauchen texanus) that are otherwise exceedingly <br />rare in the upper Colorado basin (McAda and <br />Wydoski, 1980; Tyus, 1987), as well as a possible <br />refuge for the endangered bony tail (Valdez and <br />Clemmer, 1982). Every effort should be made <br />to retain the Yampa River as a critical refugium <br />for G. c)'pha and other Colorado River fishes, <br />and as an area for further study of these unique <br />and imperiled species. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br /> <br />P. Clevenger, C. Karp, P. Minckley, K. Pau- <br />lin, L. Trinca, and C. Williams collected most <br />of the data for this project. Their diligence and <br />industry are to be commended. G. R. Smith <br />provided early discussions toward development <br />of ranking factors for this group of fishes. P. C. <br />Marsh and G. R. Smith read and improved the <br />paper. Funding and logistic support was pro- <br />vided by Arizona State University, U.S. Bureau <br />of Reclamation, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser- <br />vice. Issuance of permits by the States of Col- <br />orado and Utah, U.S. National Park Service <br />(Dinosaur National Monument), and U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service is gratefully acknowl- <br />edged. <br /> <br />LITERATURE CITED <br /> <br />BAIRD, S. F., AND C. GIRARD. 1854. Descriptions of <br />some new fishes from the River Zuiii. Proc. Acad. <br />Nat. Sci. Philad. 6(1853):368-369. <br />BEHNKE, R.]. 1980. The impacts of habitat alter- <br />ations on the endangered and threatened fishes of <br />the upper Colorado River basin, p. 204-216. In: <br />Energy development in the southwest. Vol. II. W. <br />O. Spofford, Jr., A. L. Parker and A. V. Kneese <br />(eds.). Resources for the Future, Research Paper <br />R-18. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, <br />Maryland. <br />BLACKITH, R. K, AND R. A. REYMENT. 1971. Multi- <br />variate morphometrics. Academic Press, New York, <br />New York. <br />BOOKSTEIN, F. L., B. CHERNOFF, R. ELDER, ]. <br />HUMPHRIES, G. SMITH AND R. STRAUSS. 1985. Mor- <br />phometrics in evolutionary biology. The geometry <br />of size and shape change, with examples from fishes. <br />Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad. Spec. Pub\. 15: 1-277. <br />COPE, E. D., AND H. C. YARROW. 1875. Report upon <br />the collections of fishes made in portions of Nevada, <br />Utah, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Ar- <br /> <br />DO <br /> <br />izona, during the years 18~ <br />Rep. Geogr. Geo\. Explor. <br />(Wheeler Surv.) 5:635-7( <br />DEMARAIS, B. D. 1986. M <br />Gila (Pisces: Cyprinidae) a <br />Colorado River basin. Un <br />State University, Tempe. <br />FRADKIN, P. L. 1984. A r <br />rado River and the We! <br />Press, Tucson, Arizona. <br />GIRARD, C. 1857. Resear <br />fishes inhabiting the fresh <br />of America, west of tht <br />specimens in the museu <br />stitution. Proc. Acad. Nat <br />213. <br />HOLDEN, P. B. 1968. Systt <br />Gila (Cyprinidae) of the <br />pub\. M.S. thesis, Utah <br />Utah. <br />_, AND C. B. STALNAI< <br />ies of the cyprinid genus <br />River basin. Copeia 197 <br />HUBBS, C. L. 1940. Speci <br />74:198-211. <br />_. 1941. The relat <br />tions to speciation in fis' <br />posium on hydrobiolog <br />Press, Madison, Wiscor <br />_. 1946. An arm pre <br />surement of angles in ~ <br />peia 1946:79-80. <br />_, AND K. F. LAGLU <br />Lakes region. Un ivers' <br />Arbor, Michigan. <br />JOHNSON,]. E. 1987. Pr <br />States and Canada. Am <br />thesda, Maryland. <br />JORDAN, D. S., AND B. <br />fishes of North and Mi< <br />Mus. 47(1):1-1240. <br />_,_ANDH.\\ <br />the fishes and fish-lik <br />Middle America nortl <br />of V enezuela and Colo <br />Pt. 2, App. 10:1-670. <br />KAEDING, L. R., B. D. B <br />W. R. NOONAN. 1986 <br />(Gila elegans), and ob <br />tinct cyprinid from <br />1986:1021-1032. <br />-, AND M. A. ZIM <br />and ecology of the I <br />Colorado and Colon <br />yon. Trans. Amer. F <br />MAYR, E. 1982. The I <br />diversity, evolution, a <br />Harvard University, <br />McADA, C. W., AND R <br />zorback sucker, X)'ra: <br />