Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~,-~...---_. -=---- -- <br /> <br />Table 4. Selenium concentrations in ovaries (mg/kg dw) associated with effects. <br /> Our Review LcmIy (1993.) Jarvinen IUId AnkIey (1999) <br /> Ovary Se Ovary Se Ovary Se <br />Fish Species Threshold Endpoint Threshold Endpoint Threshold <br /> Endpoint Reference <br />Fathead minnow >10.92 Highcst~on NR <br /> 10.9 No effects on Ogle and Knight, 1989 <br /> measured - no effects survival or <br /> on reproductioa reproduction <br /> 0 <br />Fathead minnow <39.3 Significantly greaIer 15 Reproductive "" <br />NR 00:: <br /> Schultz and e <br /> .. <br /> pen:entage of failure Hennanllt2:,l990 ffi <br /> abnormalities = <br /> :I. <br /> l< <br />Bluegill <38,6 65% larval mortalily 12 Reproductive 46,4b Reduced survival ~ <br /> Gillespie and c.. <br /> failure BaumllDIl, 1986 > <br /> c.. <br />Bluegill <30 Significmt reductioo. 10 Rqlroductive 2cJ' Reduced survival ! <br /> HennanutzetaL,l992 <br /> ill pen:ent hau:h me! failure <br /> IarvaJ survival <br />Bluegill 26 Geometric mCUI of 30 Rqlroductive <br /> Coyle.t aL, 1993 <br /> LOEC IIId NOEC for failure <br /> IarvaJ survival <br />Bluegill <49 10001. larval moruJity NR NR <br /> Bryson et ai" 1984 <br /> <br />... Our Revi.... <br />3 <br />t"l Ovary Se <br />~ Fish Species Threshold Endpoint <br />" <br />V;' Bluegill >9,1 88% hatchability, <br />.... <br />)- <br />II> 93% swim-up <br />II> <br />... <br />II> <br />!" <br />~ Bluegill <30 76% hatchability, <br />~ 5,6% swim-up <br />Z Bluegill >14,8 83,8-86,W. <br />~ <br />9' hatcbability, <br />- <br /><0 <br /><0 <br /><0 91.1-95.5% swim-up <br /> Bluegill >9.2 86.0% hatchability, <br /> 83.3-97,4% swim-up <br /> NR - Not reviewed. <br /> <br />Lemly (1993a) Jarvinen and Anldey (l999f <br />OvarySe Ovary Se <br />Threshold Endpoint Threshold Endpoint Reference <br />NR NR Bryson.t aL, 1985a <br />NR NR Bryson.t ai" 1985a <br />NR NR Bryson el aI., 1985b <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />Bryson et ai" 1985b <br /> <br />o <br />"" <br />C- <br />D> <br />!;' <br />...... <br />n <br />e <br />~ <br />... <br />= <br />! <br /> <br />"Ovary conccntt3tioas I'eJlOff.:d by Jarvinen and AnkIey were reported 011 a wet weight basis; if the percent moisture was not provided ill the originaIl~ they <br /> <br />assumed . moislure con:lI:Dt of 80%. The values in this lIbIe have been COIIvened to dry weight concentl'8lioas using the same perce:ot moisture assumption. <br /> <br />~ Gillespie aDd Baum.mn (1986). the dry weight COIICCIJIr3Don WlIS eslimated assuming a moisture conlet1t of 85%. <br /> <br />elt appears JarvinaJ and AnIdey (1999) may have m;.;,."'I"...tuI the ovary con<=lr1llions reported in this study (see lCXt). <br /> <br />- <br />- <br />CO <br />co <br />