<br />DcI'orcst, llrix, am! Adams
<br />
<br />Debate/Commentary
<br />
<br />and logit models were Iil to the larval mOrlalily (Abhott's coITecte<l) and
<br />growth data at 60 and 90 days (Figures 9 and 10). The lowest ECw, EC~lI' and
<br />ECsu values for mOrlality from cilher model are 19,27, and 4 I mg/kg <lw aftcr
<br />day 60 and 3.4, 5.3, and 12 mg/kg dw aher day 90. Based on thc growth
<br />endpoint, the lowcst ECw, EGlll, and EC5l, values from either model arc II, 17,
<br />and 30 mg/ kg dw aftcr day 60 and 10, 15, and 24 mg/ kg dw aher day 90. For
<br />the samc reasons discusscd above, fUrlhc," studies on chinook salmon should
<br />be conducted to verify thcse results, as well as studies of nonanadromous
<br />coldwater fish in order to determinc if they are similarly sensitive.
<br />For wannwater fish, similar to the ovary versus lalval mortality analyses
<br />described above. we <:ompared larval mortality data to dietary selellium con-
<br />centrations led to the parcnl/ish. The relev.lIlt studies IllI" this .Inalysis were
<br />Ogle and Knight ( 19M9), lll)'son el aI. (19M5b). Wom.:k el aI. (19M7). and Coyle
<br />el ai. (1993). Probit and logit models were fillO thc lalvalmorlality and <liclm)'
<br />selenium dala fl'Om lhese sludies. The model /ilS werc relatively poor, prima-
<br />rily duc to the exlrcme dillcrcnces in larval morlality in the Ogle and Knighl
<br />(19M9) and Woock el ai (1!1H7) sludies at a dielary conccnlralion of about
<br />29 mg/kg dw. If thc Ogle and Knight (1989) fathead minnow dala are re-
<br />moved, the lilS of lhe probil and logit models become much beller (Figme
<br />11). Larval mOrlalily may not have been as high in lhe Ogle and Knight (I !IM9)
<br />study because the falhead minnow diets were spiked with 50% selenilc, 25%
<br />selenale, and 25% organosclenium, and organoselcnium is more loxic Ihan
<br />inorganic selcnium (Woock el aI., J !>67). The ECw, EC~lI' a1l(1 ECslI values using
<br />the model excluding the Ogle and K.night (1989) dala are 10, 13, and 19 hased
<br />on bolh the probit and logilmodels. Using dala from all appropriale studies,
<br />we reconllnend lhe ECw of 10 mg/kg dw as the dietary threshold for huval
<br />mOrlality in wanmvaler lish. Similarly, Ihe ECw of II mg/kg dw is recom-
<br />mended as the diclary lhreshold lor reduced growth in lalval coldwaler
<br />anadromous /ish. The ECIII values from lhe prohit .\Ild logit models li)r h011l
<br />warmwater fish and coldwater anadromous suggest thallhe dietary guideline
<br />of 3 mg/kg dw recommended by l.emly (I 993a) may be overly collsclvativc. It
<br />must be reemphasizcd lhal the Hamillon el aI. (l990) study should he re-
<br />peated to delermine if lhe 90-day resulls arc illdeed villid and that lill'lher
<br />sludies should be conducled 10 examille the sensitivilies of chinook salmon
<br />relalivc to olher coldwaterlish (pal"licularly nonanadromous fish). Moreover,
<br />lhis threshold lor lalval coldwatcr anadromous /ish may he relevalll for mod-
<br />eling a lotie system, but probably nol a lenlic system.
<br />
<br />'\
<br />'\.\
<br />
<br />... \
<br />\" \
<br />".\
<br />'",\
<br />\
<br />". \.
<br />\.
<br />'...\
<br />,
<br />l{
<br />\,
<br />'\
<br />~
<br />\
<br />,
<br />~
<br />
<br />
<br />"1~:....: : :
<br />a! ri ~
<br />~j~:~
<br />;;;
<br />o 0 ~
<br />UUU
<br />Iollollol
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />SUMMARy AND CONCLUSIONS
<br />
<br />The most appropriate lissue for developing a residue-based selcnium guide-
<br />line is the oval)'. 11 is the lJesl predictor of seleniulll conccnlralions to which
<br />embryos and larvae are exposed. Use of an oval)'-based guideline is also more
<br />appropriate than a dietal)'-bascd guideline because oval)' I'csidues represent
<br />the iUlegralion ofwalerlJorne and dietal)' exposures tllatnatnrallish popula-
<br />lions receive. Oue ofthe key uncel"lainties in establishing residue-based guide-
<br />
<br />o
<br />Q
<br />-
<br />
<br />Q
<br />0\
<br />
<br />Q
<br />00
<br />
<br />Q
<br />r--
<br />
<br />Q
<br />\C
<br />
<br />Q
<br />III
<br />
<br />Q
<br />..,.
<br />
<br />Q
<br />M
<br />
<br />(p;Jp;JJJO;) S,lJoqqv) ^JIIB)JOVt( IBUB'] %
<br />
<br />1111111. Ewl. Risk Assess, Vol. 5, No. Ii, I !l!J!)
<br />
<br />'"'"
<br />'tl ,.....
<br />.. 1l
<br />~ ~
<br />oS 0
<br />III ....
<br />I:l III
<br />~ I:l
<br />(-0 ~
<br />~~
<br />Q Q ~ Q
<br />0\ 0\ \C
<br />~ ~,~, ~
<br />-=:l ~ -=:l -=:l
<br />.t! oJ' .t! oJ'
<br />.g .~ .g .~
<br />,t .::s ,t ...J
<br />I ..
<br />
<br />
<br />Q
<br />M
<br />
<br />Q
<br />....
<br />
<br />Q
<br />
<br />III
<br />..,.
<br />
<br />Q
<br />..,.
<br />
<br /> 0-
<br /> O'!
<br /> en
<br /> .....
<br /> <I'
<br /> 'tl
<br /> c:
<br /> 9
<br /> :":l
<br /> ~
<br /> ::r:
<br /> s
<br /> 0
<br /> J::l
<br /> r3
<br /> g
<br />.- c:
<br />0
<br />~ ~
<br />'tl
<br />~ ".
<br />.! 0
<br /> 0
<br /> c:
<br />.. :E
<br />II)
<br />~ u
<br />'& .5
<br />= ~
<br />.. ~
<br />'0
<br />~ 0
<br /> e
<br /> ]
<br /> ~
<br /> ~
<br /> 'C::
<br /> v
<br /> ]
<br /> ;..
<br /> "
<br /> .8
<br /> v
<br /> '0
<br /> ~
<br /> .Q
<br /> ~
<br />
<br />III
<br />M
<br />
<br /><:>
<br />f'l
<br />
<br />III
<br />M
<br />
<br /><:>
<br />M
<br />
<br />III
<br />....
<br />
<br />Q
<br />....
<br />
<br />III
<br />
<br /><:>
<br />
<br />1219
<br />
|