Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DcI'orcst, llrix, am! Adams <br /> <br />Debate/Commentary <br /> <br />and logit models were Iil to the larval mOrlalily (Abhott's coITecte<l) and <br />growth data at 60 and 90 days (Figures 9 and 10). The lowest ECw, EC~lI' and <br />ECsu values for mOrlality from cilher model are 19,27, and 4 I mg/kg <lw aftcr <br />day 60 and 3.4, 5.3, and 12 mg/kg dw aher day 90. Based on thc growth <br />endpoint, the lowcst ECw, EGlll, and EC5l, values from either model arc II, 17, <br />and 30 mg/ kg dw aftcr day 60 and 10, 15, and 24 mg/ kg dw aher day 90. For <br />the samc reasons discusscd above, fUrlhc," studies on chinook salmon should <br />be conducted to verify thcse results, as well as studies of nonanadromous <br />coldwater fish in order to determinc if they are similarly sensitive. <br />For wannwater fish, similar to the ovary versus lalval mortality analyses <br />described above. we <:ompared larval mortality data to dietary selellium con- <br />centrations led to the parcnl/ish. The relev.lIlt studies IllI" this .Inalysis were <br />Ogle and Knight ( 19M9), lll)'son el aI. (19M5b). Wom.:k el aI. (19M7). and Coyle <br />el ai. (1993). Probit and logit models were fillO thc lalvalmorlality and <liclm)' <br />selenium dala fl'Om lhese sludies. The model /ilS werc relatively poor, prima- <br />rily duc to the exlrcme dillcrcnces in larval morlality in the Ogle and Knighl <br />(19M9) and Woock el ai (1!1H7) sludies at a dielary conccnlralion of about <br />29 mg/kg dw. If thc Ogle and Knight (1989) fathead minnow dala are re- <br />moved, the lilS of lhe probil and logit models become much beller (Figme <br />11). Larval mOrlalily may not have been as high in lhe Ogle and Knight (I !IM9) <br />study because the falhead minnow diets were spiked with 50% selenilc, 25% <br />selenale, and 25% organosclenium, and organoselcnium is more loxic Ihan <br />inorganic selcnium (Woock el aI., J !>67). The ECw, EC~lI' a1l(1 ECslI values using <br />the model excluding the Ogle and K.night (1989) dala are 10, 13, and 19 hased <br />on bolh the probit and logilmodels. Using dala from all appropriale studies, <br />we reconllnend lhe ECw of 10 mg/kg dw as the dietary threshold for huval <br />mOrlality in wanmvaler lish. Similarly, Ihe ECw of II mg/kg dw is recom- <br />mended as the diclary lhreshold lor reduced growth in lalval coldwaler <br />anadromous /ish. The ECIII values from lhe prohit .\Ild logit models li)r h011l <br />warmwater fish and coldwater anadromous suggest thallhe dietary guideline <br />of 3 mg/kg dw recommended by l.emly (I 993a) may be overly collsclvativc. It <br />must be reemphasizcd lhal the Hamillon el aI. (l990) study should he re- <br />peated to delermine if lhe 90-day resulls arc illdeed villid and that lill'lher <br />sludies should be conducled 10 examille the sensitivilies of chinook salmon <br />relalivc to olher coldwaterlish (pal"licularly nonanadromous fish). Moreover, <br />lhis threshold lor lalval coldwatcr anadromous /ish may he relevalll for mod- <br />eling a lotie system, but probably nol a lenlic system. <br /> <br />'\ <br />'\.\ <br /> <br />... \ <br />\" \ <br />".\ <br />'",\ <br />\ <br />". \. <br />\. <br />'...\ <br />, <br />l{ <br />\, <br />'\ <br />~ <br />\ <br />, <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />"1~:....: : : <br />a! ri ~ <br />~j~:~ <br />;;; <br />o 0 ~ <br />UUU <br />Iollollol <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />SUMMARy AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The most appropriate lissue for developing a residue-based selcnium guide- <br />line is the oval)'. 11 is the lJesl predictor of seleniulll conccnlralions to which <br />embryos and larvae are exposed. Use of an oval)'-based guideline is also more <br />appropriate than a dietal)'-bascd guideline because oval)' I'csidues represent <br />the iUlegralion ofwalerlJorne and dietal)' exposures tllatnatnrallish popula- <br />lions receive. Oue ofthe key uncel"lainties in establishing residue-based guide- <br /> <br />o <br />Q <br />- <br /> <br />Q <br />0\ <br /> <br />Q <br />00 <br /> <br />Q <br />r-- <br /> <br />Q <br />\C <br /> <br />Q <br />III <br /> <br />Q <br />..,. <br /> <br />Q <br />M <br /> <br />(p;Jp;JJJO;) S,lJoqqv) ^JIIB)JOVt( IBUB'] % <br /> <br />1111111. Ewl. Risk Assess, Vol. 5, No. Ii, I !l!J!) <br /> <br />'"'" <br />'tl ,..... <br />.. 1l <br />~ ~ <br />oS 0 <br />III .... <br />I:l III <br />~ I:l <br />(-0 ~ <br />~~ <br />Q Q ~ Q <br />0\ 0\ \C <br />~ ~,~, ~ <br />-=:l ~ -=:l -=:l <br />.t! oJ' .t! oJ' <br />.g .~ .g .~ <br />,t .::s ,t ...J <br />I .. <br /> <br /> <br />Q <br />M <br /> <br />Q <br />.... <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />III <br />..,. <br /> <br />Q <br />..,. <br /> <br /> 0- <br /> O'! <br /> en <br /> ..... <br /> <I' <br /> 'tl <br /> c: <br /> 9 <br /> :":l <br /> ~ <br /> ::r: <br /> s <br /> 0 <br /> J::l <br /> r3 <br /> g <br />.- c: <br />0 <br />~ ~ <br />'tl <br />~ ". <br />.! 0 <br /> 0 <br /> c: <br />.. :E <br />II) <br />~ u <br />'& .5 <br />= ~ <br />.. ~ <br />'0 <br />~ 0 <br /> e <br /> ] <br /> ~ <br /> ~ <br /> 'C:: <br /> v <br /> ] <br /> ;.. <br /> " <br /> .8 <br /> v <br /> '0 <br /> ~ <br /> .Q <br /> ~ <br /> <br />III <br />M <br /> <br /><:> <br />f'l <br /> <br />III <br />M <br /> <br /><:> <br />M <br /> <br />III <br />.... <br /> <br />Q <br />.... <br /> <br />III <br /> <br /><:> <br /> <br />1219 <br />