My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7031
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:32:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7031
Author
Deacon, J. E.
Title
Endangered and Threatened Fishes of the West
USFW Year
1979
USFW - Doc Type
Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />~DJ/l <br />I C(I q ((< <br /> <br />()7'c~1 <br /> <br />ENDANGERED AND THR.EATENED FISHES OF THE WEST <br /> <br />James E. Deacon' <br /> <br />ABSTRACT.- The endangered and threatened fish fauna of the United States exhibits problems resulting primarily <br />from habitat modification by man. The evolutionary history of the fauna has left it especially sensitive to biotic <br />interactions. In addition, many forms are of such restricted distribution that the entire taxon can be destroyed by <br />very minor perturbations. The effects of habitat modification on woundfin and roundtail chub in the Virgin River of <br />Utah, Arizona, and Nevada are discussed. Parasitism by Lemea on White River springfish is shown to coincide with <br />population decline in some, but not all, cases. Population declines of Pahrump killifish are related to biotic inter- <br />actions with both goldfish and mosquitofish. Population size of Devils Hole pupfish are shown to be quite responsive <br />to small changes in habitat availability. <br />Fishes of the West are affected by the same general kinds of ecological problems that are causing extinctions <br />throughout the world. The interplay of economics with perceived value in society has led us into the numerous <br />ecolOgical problems facing us today. There is some evidence to suggest that society is making some preliminary ef- <br />fort to slow the rate of extermination. Perhaps this is happening because the conclusions of ecologists, philosophers, <br />and theologians regarding the relationship of man and environment are to some extent being translated into legisla- <br />tion as well as into conventional wisdom. <br /> <br />.1 <br /> <br />The fish fauna of the western United States <br />has frequently been characterized as one hav- <br />ing a relatively low diversity and containing <br />an unusually high percentage of endemic <br />taxa exhibiting limited distributions (Miller <br />1959, Smith 1978). These appear also to be <br />the primary features contributing to the fact <br />that much of the fauna is threatened to some <br />degree. <br />Recently, the Endangered Species Com- <br />mittee of the American Fisheries Society <br />compiled a listing of threatened fishes of <br />North America (Deacon et al. 1979). The <br />fishes on that list from the western United <br />States are presented here as a data base for <br />the general discussion (Tables 5 and 6). The <br />predominant threats to all taxa listed were <br />generalized into five broad categories and <br />each taxon was assigned one or more of these <br />categories. Threat categories were as follows: <br />(1) The present or threatened destruction, <br />modification, or curtailment of the habitat or <br />range. (2) Overutilization for' commercial, <br />sporting, scientific, or educational purposes. <br />(3) Disease or parasitism. (4) Other natural or <br />manmade factors affecting continued exist- <br />ence (hybridization, introduction of exotic or <br />translocated species, predation, competition). <br />(5) Restricted range of the taxon. A com- <br /> <br />lDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154.. <br /> <br />--1 <br /> <br />parison of threats to western fishes north of <br />Mexico with those to eastern fishes is of gen- <br />eral interest and illustrates significant differ- <br />ences between the two faunas (Table 1). <br />Habitat modification (Category 1) is clear- <br />ly the most prevalent threat to native fishes <br />throughout the world, and this is certainly <br />true ~n North America. There are a few spe- <br />cies in the West, however, that are not now <br />so threatened. No eastern species, however, <br />has escaped problems raised by physical al- <br />teration of the habitat. <br />No western species has been or is threat- <br />ened by overexploitation (Category 2), but <br />about 7 percent of the eastern fishes on the <br />list are or were so threatened. Six species of <br />ciscoes occurring in the Great Lakes were <br />subjected to overfishing by commercial fish- <br />ermen, changes resulting from the in- <br />troduction of the sea lamprey, and general <br />environmental degradation (Scott and Cross- <br />man 1973). In addition, the Atlantic whitefish <br />has been subjected to overfishing as well as <br />habitat alteration. They represent the only <br />fish taxa in the United States or Canada to be <br />on the American Fisheries Society list of <br />threatened species, in part, because of over- <br />exploitation. <br />Disease and parasitism (Category 3) have <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />---.,. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />J.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.