Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Rob'ett Dolan <br />Alan Howard <br />Arthur Gallenson <br /> <br />Man-made landforms are found <br />throughout the United States; how- <br />ever, some of the most extensive <br />and persistent scars of large-scale <br />environmental modification are <br />found in the American Southwest. <br />The sparse vegetation and generally <br />slow pace of geomorphic processes <br />leave the landscape much as man <br />. leaves it-here he is a significant <br />agent of geologic change. <br /> <br />Agriculture, mining, highway con- <br />struction, and earthmoving associ- <br />ated with rapid urban growth con- <br />tribute measurably to erosion and <br />siltation. The large reservoirs on <br />the major rivers of the Southwest <br />serve as sediment sinks for much of <br />the eroded material, disrupting the <br />sediment budgets of the drainage <br />systems below the dams. In this <br /> <br />Robert Dolan u;ill be remembered as the se- <br />nior author of "Man's Impact on the Barrier <br />Islands of North Carolina," which appeared <br />in American Scientist in March 1973. Alan <br />Howard, who is also in the Department of <br />Environmental Sciences at the University of <br />Virginia, received his doctorate in 1970 from <br />The Johns Hopkins University. His research <br />interests are in fluvial geomorphology and <br />.' arid-zone landforms. Arthur Gallenson has <br />been with Grand Canyon Expeditions, <br />Kanab, Utah, for seven years. Before be- <br />coming a Colorado River Guide, he com- <br />pleted graduate degree work in geology. <br />This research was supported by the Office <br />of Natural Sciences, National Park Service, <br />Washington, D.C. The authors wish to ac- <br />knowledge the valuable discussions of their <br />colleagues during the course of a float trip in <br />1973: Yates Borden (project leader), Fred <br />Borden, Jack Rogers, Charles Strauss, Brian <br />Turner, Harmer Weeden, and Roy Johnson, <br />to whom they are especially indebted for <br />providing information on common riverfront <br />species and for discussions about vegeta- . <br />tional responses to the regulation of the <br />river. Address for Drs. Dolan and Howard: <br />Department of Environmental Sciences, <br />University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA <br />22903. <br /> <br /> <br />OJ7 0.3 :J..:,ci;J~ <br />-=-----,~,~ <br />Man's Impact on the Colorado River <br />in the Grand Canyon <br /> <br />The Grand Canyon is being affected both by the <br />vastly changed Colorado River and by the increased <br />presence of man <br /> <br />paper we will describe the environ- <br />mental impact that a recently com- <br />pleted dam-reservoir system is hav- <br />ing on one of the largest rivers in <br />the Southwest, the Colorado. The <br />reach of the Colorado that we in- <br />vestigated extends 280 miles from <br />the Glen Canyon Dam to Lake <br />Mead-an area known as the <br />Grand Canyon (Fig. 2). <br /> <br />The problem <br /> <br />When Major J. W. Powell made his <br />historic trip down the Grand Can- <br />yon in 1869, the Colorado River <br />system was one of the last unex- <br />plored regions in the United States. <br />In fact, the area was considered so <br />remote and primitive that J. C. <br />Ives, another early explorer of the <br />Southwest, described it in these <br />terms: <br /> <br />Ours has been the first, and will <br />doubtless be the last, party of whites to <br />visit this profitless locality. It seems <br />intended by nature that the Colorado <br />River, along the greater portion of its <br />lonely and majestic way, shall be for- <br />ever unvisited and undisturbed [IJ. <br /> <br />Ives's prediction was off considera- <br />bly: the National Park Service re- <br />ports that the forty-millionth visi- <br />tor will enter Grand Canyon Na- <br />tional Park sometime during the <br />present decade. <br /> <br />Even disregarding the environmen- <br />tal changes caused by forty million <br />visitors, the Colorado River today is <br />vastly different from the river Pow- <br />ell explored in the mid-180Gs. Pow- <br />ell's Colorado remained fundamen- <br />tally unchanged until Hoover Dam <br />was completed in 1935; and, al- <br />though the Hoover Dam reservoir <br />(Lake Mead) extended into the <br />lower reaches of the Grand Canyon, <br /> <br />the upper reaches of the canyon re- <br />mained in an essentially natural <br />state until the Glen Canyon Dam <br />reservoir (Lake Powell) was com- <br />pleted in 1963. Since then, the flow <br />of the Colorado in Marble Canyon <br />and Grand Canyon has been almost <br />completely dependent upon the re- <br />lease of water from Lake Powell <br />(Fig. 2). Virtually all the sediment <br />that formerly passed through these <br />canyons is now trapped in the res- <br />ervoir, and the frequent high water <br />(flash flood) that is associated with <br />the rivers of the Southwest is now to- <br />tally controlled. The environmental <br />responses to these changes have <br />been both rapid and significant. <br /> <br />Before Glen Canyon Dam existed, <br />the river gained volume from the <br />spring snowmelt in the headwaters, <br />reached maxiIl'um flow in Mayor <br />June, and then receded during the <br />remainder of the year. Flash flood- <br />ing in the late summer often result- <br />ed in a second peak. During periods <br />of high water, when the river had <br />the greatest transport capability, <br />large quantities of sand. and silt <br />were carried through the canyon, <br />scouring the channel. As the water <br />receded in the summer, the river <br />lost both competence and capacity <br />and deposited much of its silt and <br />sand load along the channel. The <br />river bars and terraces (colloquially <br /> <br />Figure 1. This steep beach face near Nanko- <br />weap Rapids in Marble Canyon was produced <br />by rapid undercutting of fine-grained terrace <br />deposits. Such examples of very rapid ero- <br />sion are uncommon; elsewhere the wide- <br />spread removal of pre-dam fluvial deposits by <br />backcutting becomes apparent only through <br />photographic comparison of the present <br />riverfront with pre-dam conditions. (Photo <br />by Alan Howard.) <br /> <br />Repinted from AME_RICAN SCIE!'>iTIS'I"Vol. 62, No.4, Ju!y-August, 1974, pp. 392-401 <br />