Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i 0 q ~ Doug I i{ S I <br /> <br />, I <br />i (Ji(i e I <br /> <br />f ! <br />.t1...r 0 I <br />I ",i l ~ <br /> <br />(] ~ "7 h.-' <br />Q,1I/JJ <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />I.' <br /> <br />Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127:163-173,1998 <br />@ Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1998 <br /> <br />Multivariate Discrimination of Colorado Plateau Gila spp.: <br />The "Art of Seeing Well" Revisited <br /> <br />MICHAEL E. DOUGLAS* <br /> <br />Department of Zoology and Museum, Arizona State University <br />Tempe, Arizona 85287-1501, USA <br /> <br />ROBERT R. MILLER <br /> <br />Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan <br />Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA <br /> <br />W. L. MINCKLEY <br /> <br />Department of Zoology and Museum, Arizona State University <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />Abstract.-Fishery managers have long been troubled by phenotypic variation within and among <br />Colorado Plateau Gila. The problem is twofold. From an historical perspective, there was reticence <br />to investigate fishes long considered as "undesirable." In a taxonomic sense, there is confusion <br />over within- and among-species variability. We document the former, then clarify the latter by <br />applying discriminant analysis to meristic and morphometric data collected from museum speci- <br />mens. We test three hypotheses: roundtail chub G. robusta, humpback chub G. cypha, and bony tail <br />G. elegans are morphologically indistinguishable; juveniles are assignable to species based upon <br />adult characters; and putative hybrids are morphologically intermediate between parental forms. <br />Through the use of meristic characters in a nonparametric discriminant analysis, over 95% of all <br />adults were segregated to species. By using morphometric characters, 97% could be allocated to <br />species. Gila robusta was easily separated from G. cypha and G. elegans. The latter were most <br />difficult of all species-pairs to discriminate, yet field characters still segregated them at better than <br />95%. A discriminant function, based upon five morphometric characters, will allocate unknowns <br />to species. Juvenile G. robusta were easily discriminated (>97%), but juveniles of G. cypha and <br />G. elegans were often misidentified as G. robusta. Putative hybrids were generally assigned to one <br />or the other parental form; thus, hybrid intermediacy could not be rejected. However, paucity of <br />hybrids weakened the test. We conclude that factors most important in segregating these species <br />are character selection, adequate analyses, and "the art of seeing well." <br /> <br />, ; <br /> <br />* Corresponding author: m.douglas@asu.edu <br /> <br />among species. This phenotypic diversity has been <br />attributed to numerous causes, both biological and <br />methodological: Ecotypy-ecophenotypy (Miller <br />1945, 1946), hybridization (Holden and Stalnaker <br />1970; Dowling and DeMarais 1993), ontogeny <br />(Douglas 1993), character selection (Douglas et al. <br /> <br />The cyprinid fish genus Gila, endemic to west- <br />ern North America, exhibits a mosaic of morpho- <br />logical and meristic variation both within and <br /> <br />163 <br />