My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7860
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7860
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:32:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7860
Author
Douglas, M. E. and P. C. Marsh
Title
Population Estimates/Population Movements of
USFW Year
1996
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />to <br /> <br />\q9~ Oou9\Q~ <br /> <br />Cop,ia. 1996(1), pp. 15-28 <br /> <br />7'6 toO <br /> <br />Population Estimates/Population Movements of Gila cypha, <br />an Endangered Cyprinid Fish in the Grand Canyon <br />Region of Arizona <br /> <br />MICHAEL E. DOUGLAS AND PAUL C. MARSH <br /> <br />Gila cypha (the humpback chub) is a unique but endangered cyprind fish en- <br />demic to the Colorado River system in western North America. Its distribution <br />within the system is patchy; occurrence is restricted primarily to narrow, canyon- <br />bound reaches of these rivers. Greatest abundance is achieved at the confluence <br />of the Colorado and Little Colorado rivers (= LCR) in northern Grand Canyon <br />(Coconino County, AZ). This study defines the nature and extent of G. cypha's <br />movements within the LCR, and tests the hypothesis that its duration of stay <br />within that river is restricted to the reproductive period. <br />During 1991-1992, adult G. cypha were captured and tagged during 19 6-14 <br />day sampling periods in three separate reaches of the LCR. From these data, <br />population estimates were derived for each reach on a monthly basis, by month <br />for the entire LCR, and over the entire study period. Results indicate an upriver <br />migration by some individuals in early spring, followed by a slow, protracted <br />postreproductive movement downstream. Localized stasis by adults in the LCR, <br />particularly summer through winter, is also strongly supported by the data. <br />Movements by G. cypha in the LCR thus appears to be an amalgam of two <br />processes: upriver movement in spring coupled with localized movements by <br />overwintering adults. The latter suggests a possible alteration in life-history <br />strategy for the species and is discussed in the context of Glen Canyon Dam, <br />built in 1963 to impound Lake Powell at the northern extent of Grand Canyon. <br /> <br />THE Colorado River is "probably the most <br />utilized, controlled, and fought over river <br />in the world. It flows through lands of incom- <br />parable beauty and includes nearly seven per- <br />cent of the nation's contiguous land mass, in- <br />cluding parts of seven states. From the time of <br />early settlers to the present, the waters of the <br />Colorado River have been the key to develop- <br />ment of the arid region" (Crawford and Peter- <br />son, I974:vi). <br />Waters of the Colorado River basin are not <br />only economically important but also contain <br />the most distinctive ichthyofauna in North <br />America, with species-level endemism ap- <br />proaching 75% (Minckley, 1991; 93% if unde- <br />scribed forms and subspecies are included, as <br />in Carlson and Muth, 1989). The parallel im- <br />portance of economic potential and ichthy- <br />ofaunal diversity has initiated a classic and on- <br />going confrontation between development and <br />conservation (see Wydowski and Hamill, 1991). <br />From the conservation viewpoint, at risk is a <br />unique and endemic ichthyofauna of ancient <br />origin, extending as far back as the Miocene <br />(Miller, 1959; Minckley et aI., 1986). These fish- <br />es possess remarkable adaptations to survive in <br />a turbulent environment. Foremost are a suite <br />of morphological and anatomical modifications <br />which may act in concert to minimize the river's <br /> <br />impact upon the phenotype of the fish while <br />optimizing the abilities of the fish to negotiate <br />boulder-strewn, high velocity rapids. Although <br />alternative hypotheses may explain the evolu- <br />tion of these phenotypes, morphological trends <br />across numerous, unrelated taxa speak for com- <br />monality in other than phylogeny, and the se- <br />lective arena of the river seems reasonable <br />(Minckley, 1991:128). The majority of these <br />fishes are endangered (or candidates for such <br />listing; see Minckley and Douglas, 1991) due to <br />numerous recent habitat modifications by mod- <br />ern humans. <br />The specialized morphologies of the main- <br />stream Colorado River fish fauna reach their <br />culmination in the phenotype of humpback chub <br />(Gila cypha; Fig. I), the most remarkably spe- <br />cialized minnow in western North America and <br />one of the most bizarre in the world (Miller, <br />1964; Minckley, 1991; Douglas, 1993; and ref- <br />erences therein). It is known only from the Col- <br />orado River and its major, swift-flowing tribu- <br />taries (Holden and Minckley, 1980); it occurs <br />only sporadically and is seldom locally abun- <br />dant, particularly when compared to other in- <br />digenous fishes. Gila cypha has been recorded <br />from the gorge sections of the Green and Yam- <br />pa rivers in Utah and Colorado (Green River <br />Wilderness Area and Dinosaur National Mon- <br /> <br />@ 1996 by the American SocielY or IchlhyologiSlS and Herpelo1ogisLS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.