Laserfiche WebLink
394 <br />Management Options <br />lines for each generation may be carried out in a <br />single yeaz, or as is preferred for longer-living <br />species, in three successive years (Fig. 20.2. <br />Evaluation <br />Evaluation of success of programmes that re- <br />habilitate or introduce species using hatchery <br />fish is fraught with many problems in river man- <br />agement. Sampling is very difficult, especially for <br />small fish, and population estimates are usually <br />very unreliable except by direct count methods of <br />migratory fish at fishways (McMenemy & Kynard <br />1988;; Beamesderfer & Rieman 1988. Sampling <br />people who catch or eat fish may provide useful <br />information about riverine fish, especially with <br />artisanal fisheries (Bayley & Petrere 1989 but the <br />quantitative methods to estimate fish production, <br />survival and yield are poorly developed relative to <br />approaches for the same parameters for lakes, <br />small' streams and reservoirs. Casselmann et al <br />(1990 surveyed 73 scientists from l2 countries <br />for their experience in sampling large river sys- <br />tems. This survey reviewed and evaluated many <br />types of sampling gear but concluded that none <br />was suitable for sampling large river systems in <br />all types of habitat and situations. <br />20.3 FACTORS INFLUENCING <br />SUCCESS <br />As stated earlier in this chapter, there must be a <br />commitment by river catchment managers to <br />include fisheries management as a component of <br />their plans. Therefore, the catchment planning <br />process becomes the most important factor that <br />could influence the success of any fish stocking <br />scheme. From the very beginning of this process, <br />it should be evident from the catchment plan as <br />to what quality and quantity of fish habitat will <br />be delivered by the plan. Further, the plan must <br />indicate where the various fish habitats will be in <br />the catchment, what variability can be expected <br />and when, in any one year, those changing con- <br />ditions are likely to occur. Nelson et al (1992) <br />used a hierazchical system to classify locations <br />and sites in northeastern Nevada, USA. The sys- <br />tem is based on the integration of geology, geo- <br />morphology and local habitat features. The <br />authors were able to develop preliminary criteria <br />for assessing a fishery on a large scale (km2) <br />to save time and money, by analysing detailed <br />habitat attributes on those sites most likely to be <br />important for the chosen fish community. <br />The application of the ideas and concerns out- <br />lined in the remainder of this section is predicated <br />singularly on the forewarning any catchment <br />plan should provide. It is at this level of prep- <br />aration that the public and their legislative rep- <br />resentatives become involved. Consultation over <br />and acceptance of catchment plans and their fish <br />management components provide greater as- <br />surance that fiscal resources and commitment to <br />sustainability will be forthcoming. <br />The concept of sustainability is an important <br />pazt of planning for fisheries in a river catchment. <br />Gardiner (1991) argues for ecological sustain- <br />ability that includes social, political and legal <br />components where economic and environmental <br />sustainability are very much interrelated. His <br />paper is an excellent treatise on the value of plan- <br />ning at the catchment level to achieve holistic <br />management of riverine systems. <br />Water quality and quantity <br />Water-quality management for fish production <br />and survival of hatchery fish includes the opti- <br />mizing of not only discharges for current and <br />volume, but also of the water levels and wetted <br />margins of streams. The complicated interre- <br />lationships between instream flow and fish pro- <br />duction have caused many problems in fish and <br />river management. Often fisheries managers have <br />had neither expertise nor data readily available to <br />help plan for the effects of changes in hydrological <br />regimes. However, Gustard (1992 reported sig- <br />nificant advances in the understanding of river <br />regimes, including international databases that <br />could help in the understanding of global influ- <br />ences on floods and their frequency. <br />Water abstraction schemes, e.g. cooling, <br />drinking-water supplies, especially those that <br />withdraw large volumes (>500 m3 min-1 f, present <br />major hazards to fish, and could 'harvest' ma- <br />jor portions ~ :f planted species intended to re- <br />habilitate ariver system. Various fish protection <br />devices have been designed for water extraction <br />systems, but few, if any, prevent entrapment and <br />impingement of all species offish (Fletcher 1985. <br />