Laserfiche WebLink
396 <br />Management Options <br />economic and resource protection policy for har- <br />vesting Adams River sockeye salmon (Oncor- <br />hynchus nerka). The policy proposed that a <br />subdotxrinant run be fished at 50% harvest rate in <br />the first year and a moratorium be imposed on <br />fishing', off-year runs for a period o~ 8-12 years. <br />This proposal would put all the gains from a <br />reduced rate of harvest into increasing the size <br />of the spawning population. When an optimal <br />escapement level was achieved, harvesting would <br />be reinitiated. Unfortunately, senior manage- <br />ment appeared to be more sensitive to the reduc- <br />tion in fishing times and local employment, <br />so the policy was considered impractical even <br />though the proposal could contribute up to $600 <br />million'(Can) to the net value of the fish stock. <br />Major river diversions on the scale of those <br />in Siberia and northern Quebec (Kierans 1988; <br />Berkes 1989) present different hazards to fish <br />management dependent on fish stocking. As well <br />as significant shifts in habitat, in local climates <br />and in stage discharge patterns, diversions even- <br />tually change the character of the native fish <br />assemblages such that new or existing species <br />increased by fortuitous habitat shifts may prevent <br />the successful management of the intended fish <br />species. ~teliance on cultured fish to offset these <br />changes is inevitably misplaced. <br />However, once major ecologically profound <br />changes have been accomplished within a river <br />catchment, fisheries managers have to get on <br />with the. job of managing this altered environ- <br />ment to maximize fish production on a sustain- <br />able basis. In many cases, fish are an essential <br />food item so that restoration of fish production as <br />soon as possible is often close to an emergency. <br />At the same time, it would be a risky investment <br />to take just any approach. Planning will lead one <br />through a logical sequence asking questions and <br />seeking answers until the best solution can be <br />identified for the management of the fish com- <br />munity in the new environment. <br />Conflicting land/water use <br />The best fish culture strategies and practices in <br />the world' rarely offset the detrimental results <br />of major land and water management practices <br />which destroy certain components of a river sys- <br />tern essential to the production and maintenance <br />of fish stocks. For example, Raymond (1988) <br />showed that major alterations in dam and im- <br />poundment management combined with lazge <br />releases of smolt from hatcheries offset the decline <br />of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the <br />Columbia River, but failed to compensate for ma- <br />jorlosses of returning Chinook (O. tschawytscha). <br />Also, most returning adults were of hatchery <br />origin, suggesting native gene pools had also been <br />lost. Here may be a case for arguing for the estab- <br />lishment of hatchery stocks from broodstocks of <br />local origin. <br />Management of established reservoirs can in- <br />fluencethe survival and growth ofhatchery-reazed <br />fish. Fisheries previously dependent in the main <br />on hatchery productions can be boosted and even <br />made self-sufficient by changes and innovations in <br />reservoir management. In mid-western America, <br />populations of centrachids (Centrachidae) do- <br />minate impoundment fisheries and aze enhanced <br />by increased time of storage of flood waters <br />(Mitzner 1981). At the same time, cool and cold- <br />waterfish populations usually decline so that any <br />maintenance of these species becomes almost <br />exclusively hatchery dependent. Even Coldwater <br />tailrace fisheries are usually based on stocking. <br />Genetic integrity of wild and hatchery stocks <br />The overall fitness of any species and of any of its <br />many stocks should be a major concern of a man- <br />agerusing hatchery fish to rehabilitate and main- <br />tain a riverine fish community. Undoubtedly, <br />there are major differences among various species <br />and stocks in their predilection to adapt to rigor- <br />ous environmental conditions in any river over <br />any annual cycle. Testing of stocks Eor these <br />abilities would be an ideal screening mechanism <br />to increase probability of returns of planted fish <br />and also to reduce costs for fish culture pro- <br />grammes. Challenge-testing of stocks and their <br />responses to success=limiting stresses showed <br />stocks of coho salmon (O. kisutch) had different <br />capabilities (McGeer et al 1991). Such. differ- <br />ences should influence which stock is chosen to <br />culture. <br />The danger to native populations from large- <br />scale escapes of farmed fish reflects the same <br />hay <br />hat <br />No <br />sal. <br />bre <br />seq <br />for <br />Mo <br />alw <br />fury <br />gen <br />may <br />est. <br />spry <br />asst <br />gra: <br />Mir <br />of <br />lati <br />all <br />we] <br />Effr <br />Res <br />acc <br />fair <br />leuc <br />nay <br />by a <br />late <br />beep <br />affe <br />grog <br />grar <br />fish <br />toxi <br />tam <br />C <br />ages <br />rive <br />to <br />ma} <br />any <br />ma} <br />on ~ <br />they <br />toxi <br />