Laserfiche WebLink
<br />meander in order to obtain good representation of different habitat types. <br />This reach was judged to be representative of the upper Colorado River <br />between Rifle (river mile 241) and DeBeque (river mile 210), Colorado, based <br />upon overall stream morphology which reflected consistent gradient, bed <br />material and meander wavelength (Ruhe 1975). Although the endangered <br />Colorado squawfish is not found in this area and the candidate razorback <br />sucker occ-urs in low numbers, the reac h appears to be representati ve of <br />areas further downstream that support the endangered fishes (Valdez et al. <br />1982) . <br /> <br />Habitat Mappi ng <br /> <br />Detailed maps of the river and floodplain-were generated from photo- <br />interpretation of aerial photographs. Maps were developed at a hori zontal <br />scale of 1" = 200' with 2-foot contours. <br /> <br />River habitats were mapped on 3 March 1983 and weekly from 6 June to 2 <br />September 1983 in the 2-mile study section of river. The habitats were <br />designated as one of the following 12 categories: backwater, eddy, pool, <br />isolated pool, embrynat, concavity, riffle, river, rapid, rubble flat, <br />shorel ine, and flooded woodlands (Archer et al. 1980; Wick et al. 1981). <br />Each habitat was located afield and sketched on a river map. Dimensions of <br />each habitat were visually estimated and measured from maps, while <br />extinction or significant changes in habitats between mapping days were <br />dated and noted on the appropriate map. Estimation of habitats areas from <br />maps was found reliable since the photo interpretative maps provided <br />sufficient shorel ine detail for sketching the habitats. A separate map was <br />developed for each sample period. Numbers'and-surface area of habitats were <br />mathematically correlated with discharge levels reported from USGS Station <br />09093700 near DeBeque, Colorado to assess habitat area available for various <br />flow levels in the study area. <br /> <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />During the 6-month study period, from 3 March, 1983 to 2 September, <br />1983, flows in the Colorado River varied from 1,710 to 28,300 cfs. The <br />peak flow occurred on 26 June and the minimum on 3 March. Discharge values <br />for the period of weekly mapping (June - September) are shown in Figure 2. <br />The appearance, longevity and extinction of each habitat type was documented <br />by weekly mapping between 6 June and 2 September, as well as during the <br />original survey conducted on 3 March. Maps showing the distribution and <br />areal extent of habitats in the study reach at high flow, low flow and two <br />intermediate flows are shown in Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6. Total surface area <br />for each habitat was related to river discharge to illustrate gradual as <br />well as sudden changes in available habitat. <br /> <br />Of the twelve habitats examined, seven manifested changes in surface <br />area relative to flow: backwaters, flooded woodlands, rapids, riffles, <br />runs, eddies and rubble flats. Areal changes in the remaining five habitats <br />(embayments, concavities, pools, shorelines and isolated pools) did not <br />appear to be directly rel ated to river discharge. Those habitats that were <br />observed to exhibit predictable and regular changes with flow were <br />generally associated with physical features of the river that were inundated <br />when the river flowed beyond its normal channel banks (backwaters, flooded <br />woodlands and rubble flats) or were manifestations of river hydraulics at <br />the various flow stages; the area of rapids, runs and eddies increased with <br />di scharge whil e the area of ri ffl es decreased. Quanti ta ti ve rel ati onshi ps <br />describing the dynamics of habitat area as functions of river discharge for <br />the twelve habitat types are shown in Table 1. <br /> <br />251 <br />