My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6007
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
6007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:31:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6007
Author
Carter, J. G., R. E. Valdez, R. J. Ryel and V. L. Lamarra
Title
Fisheries Habitat Dynamics in the Upper Colorado River
USFW Year
1985
USFW - Doc Type
Journal of Freshwater Ecology
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />meander in order to obtain good representation of different habitat types. <br />This reach was judged to be representative of the upper Colorado River <br />between Rifle (river mile 241) and DeBeque (river mile 210), Colorado, based <br />upon overall stream morphology which reflected consistent gradient, bed <br />material and meander wavelength (Ruhe 1975). Although the endangered <br />Colorado squawfish is not found in this area and the candidate razorback <br />sucker occ-urs in low numbers, the reac h appears to be representati ve of <br />areas further downstream that support the endangered fishes (Valdez et al. <br />1982) . <br /> <br />Habitat Mappi ng <br /> <br />Detailed maps of the river and floodplain-were generated from photo- <br />interpretation of aerial photographs. Maps were developed at a hori zontal <br />scale of 1" = 200' with 2-foot contours. <br /> <br />River habitats were mapped on 3 March 1983 and weekly from 6 June to 2 <br />September 1983 in the 2-mile study section of river. The habitats were <br />designated as one of the following 12 categories: backwater, eddy, pool, <br />isolated pool, embrynat, concavity, riffle, river, rapid, rubble flat, <br />shorel ine, and flooded woodlands (Archer et al. 1980; Wick et al. 1981). <br />Each habitat was located afield and sketched on a river map. Dimensions of <br />each habitat were visually estimated and measured from maps, while <br />extinction or significant changes in habitats between mapping days were <br />dated and noted on the appropriate map. Estimation of habitats areas from <br />maps was found reliable since the photo interpretative maps provided <br />sufficient shorel ine detail for sketching the habitats. A separate map was <br />developed for each sample period. Numbers'and-surface area of habitats were <br />mathematically correlated with discharge levels reported from USGS Station <br />09093700 near DeBeque, Colorado to assess habitat area available for various <br />flow levels in the study area. <br /> <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />During the 6-month study period, from 3 March, 1983 to 2 September, <br />1983, flows in the Colorado River varied from 1,710 to 28,300 cfs. The <br />peak flow occurred on 26 June and the minimum on 3 March. Discharge values <br />for the period of weekly mapping (June - September) are shown in Figure 2. <br />The appearance, longevity and extinction of each habitat type was documented <br />by weekly mapping between 6 June and 2 September, as well as during the <br />original survey conducted on 3 March. Maps showing the distribution and <br />areal extent of habitats in the study reach at high flow, low flow and two <br />intermediate flows are shown in Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6. Total surface area <br />for each habitat was related to river discharge to illustrate gradual as <br />well as sudden changes in available habitat. <br /> <br />Of the twelve habitats examined, seven manifested changes in surface <br />area relative to flow: backwaters, flooded woodlands, rapids, riffles, <br />runs, eddies and rubble flats. Areal changes in the remaining five habitats <br />(embayments, concavities, pools, shorelines and isolated pools) did not <br />appear to be directly rel ated to river discharge. Those habitats that were <br />observed to exhibit predictable and regular changes with flow were <br />generally associated with physical features of the river that were inundated <br />when the river flowed beyond its normal channel banks (backwaters, flooded <br />woodlands and rubble flats) or were manifestations of river hydraulics at <br />the various flow stages; the area of rapids, runs and eddies increased with <br />di scharge whil e the area of ri ffl es decreased. Quanti ta ti ve rel ati onshi ps <br />describing the dynamics of habitat area as functions of river discharge for <br />the twelve habitat types are shown in Table 1. <br /> <br />251 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.