My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6007
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
6007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:31:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6007
Author
Carter, J. G., R. E. Valdez, R. J. Ryel and V. L. Lamarra
Title
Fisheries Habitat Dynamics in the Upper Colorado River
USFW Year
1985
USFW - Doc Type
Journal of Freshwater Ecology
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />/ <br />L <br />I ,~ <br />~[ '-1 <br /> <br />IQgs C~t0Y; vtud. <br /> <br />01:,60 =t- <br /> <br />_I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Fisheries Habitat Dynamics in the Upper Colorado River <br /> <br />John G. Carter <br /> <br />Richard A. Valdez <br /> <br />Ronald J. Ryel <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />Vincent A. Lamarra <br /> <br />Ecosystems Research Institute <br />975 South State Highway <br />Logan, Utah 84321 <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />An investigation in the upper Colorado River near Parachute, Colorado <br />revealed temporal variations in the amount of important fish habitats. <br />Quanti tative measures of habitat area were rel ated to flow. The <br />relationships developed between flow and surface area of specific habitats <br />revealed the existence of critical thresholds. The impl ications of these <br />results could be important in the management of the Colorado River system <br />for wildlife and human consumptive and non-consumptive uses. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The Colorado River system drains one-fifteenth of the area of the <br />United States. Most of this basin is arid to semi-arid, and the environment <br />is harsh with rivers of drastically fluctuating flows, temperatures and <br />turbidities. Many of the fishes of the Colorado River have developed unique <br />adaptations to these conditions. These conditions and a long isolation from <br />other major~iver . systems have resulted in 73% endemism, the highest <br />percentage of a-ny----rIver basin in the United States (Mill er 1961). Three of <br />these 1 arge ri ver fi shes are 1 i sted as endangered under the Endangered <br />Species Act of 1973. These are the Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus <br />lucius), humpback chub (Gila cypha), and bony tail (Gila elegans). The <br />razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanusT is also listed asillCandidate species. <br />All four of these species are protected by the State of Colorado as <br />endangered. Nine other natj1e species of fishes occur in the upper <br />Colorado River along with a number of exotics (Tyus et al. 1982). <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Presently, there is a strong confl ict between water use and the needs <br />of the endangered species within the river system. The habitat requirements <br />of these fishes vary by life stage and time of year (Holden 1977; Seethaler <br />1978; Behnke and Benson 1983; Ulmer 1981; Kaeding and Zimmerman 1982; Miller <br />et al. 1982a; Tyus et al. 1982; Valdez et al. 1982; Valdez and Clemmer <br />1982). Three factors are generally recogni zed as important in the decl ine <br />of the endangered species within the Colorado River. These are (1) dams and <br />reservoirs, (2) water withdrawals, and (3) the introduction of non-native <br />fishes into the system. <br /> <br />Resolution of the confl ict between endangered fishes and development <br />may be difficult because of the many diverse interests, including federal <br />and state resource agencies, municipalities, private industry and <br />environmental concerns. There also remains large uncertainty as to the <br />relative contribution of each development or water use to the problem, and <br />the adequacy of the existing data base to address these problems is <br />uncertain. The ongoing development of a data base through continued <br />monitoring of fish populations may in time help define important cause-and- <br />effort relationships, and help identify population trends. <br /> <br />, - <br />. <br /> <br />249 <br /> <br />Journal of Freshwater Ecology. Volume 3, Number 2 - December, 1985 <br />Copyright @ 1985 by Oikos Publishers. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.