Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/ <br />L <br />I ,~ <br />~[ '-1 <br /> <br />IQgs C~t0Y; vtud. <br /> <br />01:,60 =t- <br /> <br />_I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Fisheries Habitat Dynamics in the Upper Colorado River <br /> <br />John G. Carter <br /> <br />Richard A. Valdez <br /> <br />Ronald J. Ryel <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />Vincent A. Lamarra <br /> <br />Ecosystems Research Institute <br />975 South State Highway <br />Logan, Utah 84321 <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />An investigation in the upper Colorado River near Parachute, Colorado <br />revealed temporal variations in the amount of important fish habitats. <br />Quanti tative measures of habitat area were rel ated to flow. The <br />relationships developed between flow and surface area of specific habitats <br />revealed the existence of critical thresholds. The impl ications of these <br />results could be important in the management of the Colorado River system <br />for wildlife and human consumptive and non-consumptive uses. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The Colorado River system drains one-fifteenth of the area of the <br />United States. Most of this basin is arid to semi-arid, and the environment <br />is harsh with rivers of drastically fluctuating flows, temperatures and <br />turbidities. Many of the fishes of the Colorado River have developed unique <br />adaptations to these conditions. These conditions and a long isolation from <br />other major~iver . systems have resulted in 73% endemism, the highest <br />percentage of a-ny----rIver basin in the United States (Mill er 1961). Three of <br />these 1 arge ri ver fi shes are 1 i sted as endangered under the Endangered <br />Species Act of 1973. These are the Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus <br />lucius), humpback chub (Gila cypha), and bony tail (Gila elegans). The <br />razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanusT is also listed asillCandidate species. <br />All four of these species are protected by the State of Colorado as <br />endangered. Nine other natj1e species of fishes occur in the upper <br />Colorado River along with a number of exotics (Tyus et al. 1982). <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Presently, there is a strong confl ict between water use and the needs <br />of the endangered species within the river system. The habitat requirements <br />of these fishes vary by life stage and time of year (Holden 1977; Seethaler <br />1978; Behnke and Benson 1983; Ulmer 1981; Kaeding and Zimmerman 1982; Miller <br />et al. 1982a; Tyus et al. 1982; Valdez et al. 1982; Valdez and Clemmer <br />1982). Three factors are generally recogni zed as important in the decl ine <br />of the endangered species within the Colorado River. These are (1) dams and <br />reservoirs, (2) water withdrawals, and (3) the introduction of non-native <br />fishes into the system. <br /> <br />Resolution of the confl ict between endangered fishes and development <br />may be difficult because of the many diverse interests, including federal <br />and state resource agencies, municipalities, private industry and <br />environmental concerns. There also remains large uncertainty as to the <br />relative contribution of each development or water use to the problem, and <br />the adequacy of the existing data base to address these problems is <br />uncertain. The ongoing development of a data base through continued <br />monitoring of fish populations may in time help define important cause-and- <br />effort relationships, and help identify population trends. <br /> <br />, - <br />. <br /> <br />249 <br /> <br />Journal of Freshwater Ecology. Volume 3, Number 2 - December, 1985 <br />Copyright @ 1985 by Oikos Publishers. Inc. <br />