Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CURRY AND KYNARD: BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF EXTENDED GALVANONARCOSIS <br /> <br />1301 <br /> <br />TABLE 4. Individual test results of group activity for ruinbow <br />trout immediately after 3 h of galvanonarcosis. H = hetero- <br />geneity chi-square; P = probability of larger value of chi- <br />square; os = nonsignificant chi-square value. <br /> <br />Test Control Expected x2 df P <br />43 46 44.5 0.101 1 .90 ns <br />32 70 51.0 14.157 1 .005 <br />32 40 36.0 0.889 1 .50 ns <br />39 41 40.0 1.050 1 .90 ns <br />47 48 47.5 0.011 1 .95 ns <br />- - - - - <br />193 245 219.0 Total 15.208 5 .005 <br /> Pooled 6. 174 1 .005 <br /> H 8.034 4 .10 ns <br /> <br />questionable. During immediate evaluations, treated <br />trout displayed bursts of upright swimming and opened <br />their gills as if coughing. Swimming action of control <br />fish was more continuous and without opercular flaring. <br />The measured group activity index of treated fish did <br />not change significantly after 24 h, yet their observed <br />activity was not equivalent to that of control groups. <br />It appeared that trout treated for 3 h still suffered side <br />effects even after recovery for 24 h. . <br />An additional measure of group activity would have <br />been helpful in the analysis. Control fish were observed <br />to cluster more during the immediate evaluations than <br />treated fish. Test fish would not start responding as a <br />group until the end of the evaluation period. This <br />clustering behavior was evident in both experimental <br />and control groups after 24 h. Quantifying this be- <br />havior may be a better way to evaluate the effect of <br />electrical treatment in this case. <br />It appeared that extended galvanonarcosis affected <br />the muscles more than the sensory system. Activity <br />evaluations showed that the motor activities were defi- <br />nitely deprcssed in fish immediately after treatment. <br />Treated fish were able to detect habitat differences as <br />indicated by the study of photonegative response. In <br />the predation tests, treated fish did not react to predator <br />approach or disperse to the surface as quickly as con- <br />trol fish. The depression of motor activity in electrically <br />narcotized fish may be due to an extreme lactate in- <br />crease and an oxygen debt incurred while under gal- <br />vanonarcosis. Schreck et at. (1976) found that lactate <br />increased rapidly in rainbow trout that had been electro- <br />shocked. They observed that trout responded to electro- <br />shock as if they were suffering from extreme muscular <br />exertion andlor hypoxia. It is not known whcther fish <br />experience these same physiological changes under <br />galvanonarcosis. <br />Mortalities and delays in rccovcry time in fish sub- <br />jected to galvanonarcosis have probably been a result of <br />exposure to voltage gradients greatcr than the range <br />needed to produce immobilization. Adams et al. (] 972) <br />used voltage gradients of ] .5-3.6 V'cm-1 to narcotize <br />65-85 mm Notrop;s cornutus for 10-25 s. Fish held in <br /> <br />galvanonarcosis did not always recover to an upright <br />position within 120 S, and those that took longer often <br />died. Although Adams ct al. (1972) found a cor- <br />relation between recovery time and energy density, thc <br />voltage gradients were well in excess of those needed to <br />narcotize similar sized fish in our study and in Taylor <br />et al. (1957). Injuries from direct current are probably <br />a direct result of tetanic levels of electricity. This <br />seemed to be the case in Spencer's (1967) and Adams' <br />et al. (1972) studies, since in both studies the voltage <br />gradients were close to 3.5 V'cm-1. Data from our <br />study, Taylor et a1. (1957), Vibert (1963), Ellis (1974), <br />and Kynard and Lonsdale (1957) indicate that direct <br />current gradients below 1.5 V.cm-1 cause no injury to <br />electrically treated fish. <br />The duration of the effects of extended galvano- <br />narcosis on the behavior and physiology of treated fish <br />might be reduced by modifying the electric field applied. <br />Halsband (1955, 1967) reported that treated fish re- <br />covered to normal values of intensity of metabolism <br />within 70 min after galvanonarcosis while average re- <br />covery time for fish treated with condensor charges was <br />20 min. Thc initial exciting effect an electric current <br />has on the intensity of fish metabolism changes into a <br />paralyzing effect when the period of electrical treat- <br />ment is prolonged as well as when the current density is <br />increased (Halsband, 1955). We have found that fish <br />narcotized up to 3 h by direct currcnt show no sign of <br />behavioral side effects after 24 h. Decreasing the field <br />intensity after fish have reached the galvanonarcosis <br />stage and use of condensor charges might decrease the <br />effects and recovery time of fish immobilized by ex- <br />tended galvanonarcosis and might pCrmit treatments <br />longer than 3 h. <br />Chemicals are often used to immobilize fish for <br />handling but the concentrations nceded to produce <br />narcosis for long periods can be close to lethal levels <br />(Nelson 1953; McParland 1959; Bell 1964). Fish have <br />becn anesthetized up to 12 h with methylparafynol with- <br />out demonstrable long-term effects (McFarland 1959). <br />However, it is not easy to monitor concentrations dur- <br />ing long periods of immobilization, and the state of <br />chcmically induced narcosis can not bc terminated easily <br />if there are complications. Also. chemical anesthetics <br />affect the physiology and behavior of fish (McFarland <br />] 959; Wedemeyer 1970; Crowley and Berinati ] 972) <br />with some effects lasting up to 5 d after recovery (God- <br />dard et at. 1974). <br />Our study suggests that galvanonarcosis has strong <br />potential as an alternative to chemical anesthetics for <br />long pcriods of fish immobilization. Immobilization <br />techniques are usually cmployed in handling operations <br />such as marking and transport to minimize the chance <br />of injury (Hartley 1967). Galvanonarcosis can be used <br />to safely immobilize fish up to 3 h. There are definite <br />immediate effects on fish behavior that werc not evident <br />in the study of Kynard and Lonsdale (1975) but these <br />were not apparcnt after 24 h. Electricity can be ad- <br />justed and monitored easily so voltages needed to pro- <br />