Laserfiche WebLink
<br />410 <br /> <br />COPEIA, 2000, NO.2 <br /> <br />temperatures, sample dates, and ages (except <br />for the earliest comparisons of some older age <br />groups). Failure to detect similar length and <br />weight differences in P. lucius and G. CYPha was <br />presumably a result of small sample size result- <br />ing from analysis of only replicate means. We <br />conclude that lowered water temperature had <br />the same effect on both catostomids and cypri- <br />nids. <br />Our results and those of Berry (1988) suggest <br />early larval stages of some species (G. CYPha, P. <br />lucius) enter cold coma for periods of 5-90 min <br />upon entering cold waters, at least when expe- <br />riencing the most extreme temperature chang- <br />es (e.g., from 20 C or higher to 10 C or lower). <br />Some direct mortality is possible (Berry, 1988). <br />With smaller temperature differences (e.g., <br />from 20 C to 12 C), some cold coma may occur <br />in larvae, activity levels may be reduced, and <br />other physiological/behavioral changes may be <br />evident (see also Berry, 1988). At moderate tem- <br />perature differences (e.g., from 20 C to 14 C), <br />we noted few or no short-term effects. Older <br />larval and postlarval fishes did not exhibit any <br />apparent physiological/behavioral effects (ex- <br />cept lethargy) at any temperature change (see <br />also Berry, 1988). Research on other warmwater <br />species has also shown that behavioral changes <br />are lessened with smaller temperature differ- <br />ences (Speakman and Kenkel, 1972; Griffith, <br />1978; Burton et aI., 1979) and with older fish <br />(Pitkow, 1960; Nickum, 1966). <br />Effects of entering cold coma in the Colorado <br />River system are potentially severe. Predation <br />rates may be increased (Coutant et aI., 1974), <br />and physical damage and death may occur from <br />abrasion against substrates, entrainment in high <br />current velocities and turbulence, or from buri- <br />al if fish settle on the substrate. <br />Early life stage big-river fishes that enter cold <br />tailwaters become exposed to essentially perpet- <br />ual near-winter temperature conditions, with re- <br />sultant severe growth depression that negatively <br />acts upon numerous life-history parameters, as <br />previously noted. Our experiments showed de- <br />lays in transformation from larva to juvenile at <br />lower temperatures, in some cases extending <br />the larval stage through an entire season or <br />more. Delays in transformation lengthen expo- <br />sure to existing sources of mortality such as <br />food scarcity (Papoulias and Minckley, 1990, <br />1992), hydrological disturbance (Robinson et <br />aI., 1998), predation (Ruppert et aI., 1993), par- <br />asitism (Clarkson et aI., 1997), or other factors <br />(Houde, 1987). <br />These findings suggest that, short of dam re- <br />moval, more flexible dam operations (especially <br />warming of discharges) are needed to conserve <br /> <br />populations of Colorado River basin big-river <br />fishes in hypolimnial-release tailwaters. Effects <br />of tailwater warming via modification of Flam- <br />ing Gorge Dam resulted in immediate positive <br />response by native fishes (P. B. Holden and L. <br />W. Crist, unpubI.). Although tailwater reaches <br />may not provide all environmental elements re- <br />quired for successful completion of lifecycles of <br />some of the big-river species, they should not <br />be disregarded in recovery efforts, especially <br />given the deteriorating or tenuous status of <br />many of these fishes in other river reaches (Lan- <br />igan and Tyus, 1989; Minckley et aI., 1989; Os- <br />mundson and Burnham, 1998). <br />Kaeding and Osmundson (1988), Minckley <br />(1991), Childs and Clarkson (1996), and others <br />cautioned that increasing tailwater tempera- <br />tures to benefit warmwater native fishes may <br />also advantage nonnative aquatic biota, perhaps <br />to the detriment of the former. Absent such <br />modification, however, big-river species will like- <br />ly continue to decline and disappear from tail- <br />water reaches, as exemplified by the trend in <br />Grand Canyon (Minckley, 1991; Weiss, 1993; R. <br />Valdez and R. J. Ryel, unpubI.). Thermal mod- <br />ification of tailwaters is the only way to alleviate <br />the known restriction by cold water tempera- <br />tures to successful spawning, embryo incuba- <br />tion, and larval growth of warm water native fish- <br />es. In concert with provision of more natural <br />(pre-dam) hydrological release patterns, we be- <br />lieve expansion of nonnative fish populations <br />can be minimized to the relative benefit of na- <br />tives. Should operational changes result in ex- <br />pansion of nonnative populations to the in- <br />creased detriment of natives, a return to full hy- <br />polimnetic discharge temperatures could large- <br />ly reset the system to its former state, albeit with <br />continued deterioration of native fish stocks. <br />Resolution of conflicts between native and <br />nonnative species interactions likely will require <br />basinwide implementation of innovative activi- <br />ties that have not yet been seriously considered. <br />These should include routine provision of high- <br />magnitude floods to destabilize nonindigenous <br />fish populations (Minckley and Meffe, 1987; <br />Tyus and Karp, 1989), development of new tax- <br />on-specific ichthyocides, segregation of native <br />and nonnative (sport) fisheries, and education <br />of the public about the ecological consequences <br />of transfaunations and values of native com- <br />munities. Stopgap measures such as acquisition <br />of instream flows or increased hatchery produc- <br />tion and repatriation of native fishes may slow <br />or stop declines, but recovery of the big-river <br />native ichthyofauna of the Colorado River Basin <br />may ultimately depend upon implementation of <br /> <br />"J <br />