Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />in tl:le upper <br />Ual impact of <br />orado (n gu re <br />111 shorel ine <br />)ite) . <br /> <br />RESULTS OF PARACHUTE STUDY <br /> <br />ptember. Fi ve <br />esh seines to <br />ines, dip nets <br />lae and young- <br />1ets to assess <br />Ie. Tow nets <br />lce drHt, and <br />~ocument adul t <br /> <br />Spedes eo.position and Relative Abundance <br /> <br />Of the 13 fish species captured, only 8 were found as larvae in drift <br />nets (Figure 2). In addition to these 8, carp (.frE!.!~ ca7.!E) , black <br />bu~lh~ad (lSj~l~~~~ ~el~~), rainbow trout (~~l~E 3~.!rEE~!.! ' mountain <br />whItefIsh (~~~~21um wl11~msw), and razorback sucker r!r!~s~n t~~~) <br />were captured wlt~ther gear types, but not as drifting larvae. Only seIne <br />hauls yielded the full complement of 13 species. Three of the five native <br />species __ flannelmouth sucker (Catastomus lati.E..!Enis), bluehead sucker <br />(f~tas~onus ~EElus), and speckrerd'ac'e"{RhTiiFh~~ osculu~) -- made up <br />nearly 78 percent oT the observed shorel ine drift at fheparachute Site. <br />The remaining two native species -- roundtail chub (Gila robusta) and <br />mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi) -- raised the compOSition to--nearly 84 <br />percent. The si.;gre5peCTriieii of razorback sucker was only tentatively <br />identified since the fish was only 21.5 RID TL (Total Length) and in the <br />metalarval phase of development. <br /> <br />The midchannel benthic zone was not sampled because of high water <br />velocity and excessively deep sample conditions. The species composition of <br />the shorel ine and midchannel surface zones was very similar. Four species <br />(flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker, speckled dace, and white sucker) made <br />up the bul k of the catch (8U in shorel ine sets and 78.5t in midchannel <br />samples). Other species captured in shorel ine dri ft nets were roundtail <br />chub (6t), fathead minnow (3.2t), mottled sculpin (O.2t), and green sunfish <br />(O.2t). Other species in midchannel samples were mottled sculpin, fathead <br />minnow (each 4.8t), and roundtail chub (2.4t). Although the composition of <br />drift in the shoreline and midchannel surface zones was similar, the density <br />of shorel ine drift was nearly seven times greater. This difference was <br />significant for samples between July 18 and September 2, using a <br />randomization test of paired differences of weekly means (p=O.026). <br /> <br />etting with a <br />which tapered <br />.en end fac i n9 <br />er, except for <br />Time, water <br />t was set and <br />computed us i ng <br />et 0 pen i ng . <br /> <br />'e sorted from <br />Each larval <br />, measure its <br />,tification of <br /> <br />PARACHUTE SITE <br /> <br />PAll SADE SITE <br /> <br /> RT <br />L 33 \ <br /> 6.07. <br /> t.lS <br /> 2 <br /> MS 1.17. <br /> 1 <br /> 0.27. <br />::: <br /> BH <br /> 122 <br /> 22.07. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3.27. <br /> <br />SO <br />16 <br />9.17. <br /> <br />SU <br />13 <br />2.37. <br /> <br />;ites. <br /> <br />FIGURE 2. Number and percentage composition of fish species captured in <br />shoreline drift nets at the two study sites on the upper Colorado <br />River. BH = bluehead sucker, FH = fathead minnow, <br />FM flannelmouth sucker, GS = green sunfish, MS = mottled sculpin, <br />RT roundtail chub, SO = speckled dace, <br />SU unidentified sucker, UM = unidentified minnow, <br />UN unidentified and WS = white sucker. <br />569 <br />