Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />---- <br />y~ <br /> <br />.fo <br />f- <br /> <br />(q ~ (; C{Lrr~r; et- Ct \ <br /> <br />fI7 n 15 11 <br />Cd~a(~ 1!tt~~ <br /> <br />orsh, <br /> <br />scher (ed.) Die <br />na, East <br /> <br />Drift of Larval Fishes In the <br />Upper Colorado River <br />John G. Carter, Vincent A. Lamarra and Ronald J. Rye' <br />Ecosystems Research Institute <br />975 South State Highway <br />Logan, Utah 84321 <br /> <br />lozzi (ed.). <br />{alfte 2. <br /> <br />)n Tolerance of <br />!lIearch Center. <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />.!!!. Banks, P.O. <br />1m Oh10. <br />Case-Western <br /> <br />Native as well as some non-native fishes in the upper Colorado River <br />were found drifting during their larval and early juvenile stages of <br />developnent. Five native fishes (flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker, <br />roundtail chub, speckled dace. and mottled sculpin) dominated the drift with <br />about 87 percent of the catch. The only 3 non-native species found in the <br />drift (white sucker, fathead minnow. and g~een sunfish) occurred in very low <br />numbers. Significantly greater numbers of drifting fishes were found along <br />the shorel ine than in the midchannel surface zone. larval fish were first <br />caught in the dri ft when the water temperature reached 160C during a rapid <br />warming trend in mid-to-late July. About 65 percent of the drift recorded <br />in the two studies occurred during a two to three week period when water <br />tempera tures ranged from 18 to 21 oC. duri ng the descend ing 1 imb of spri ng <br />runoff. A diel pattern in drift densities was seen at both sites. with <br />highest numbers of larvae caught between 2000 and 0400 hours. and lowest <br />numbers between 1600 and 2000 hours. This diel pattern suggests that many <br />of the larval fishes of the Colorado River are photosensitive. and actively <br />capable of entering and escaping the surface drift currents. <br /> <br />· the Cuyahoga <br /> <br />t. Proc. Acad. <br /> <br />tozoology. <br /> <br />ited States. <br /> <br />~ed States. <br />L3. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />I cOlllll1unities. <br />I. U. Calif. <br /> <br />The phenomenon of drift among fishes of the upper Colorado River was <br />only recently described in studies of the federally-endangered Colorado <br />squawfi sh (Ptychocheil u.! ~). humpback chub (i.U2 ~). and bonyta il <br />chub (Gila elegans). as well as the candidate razorback sucker (Xrrauchen <br />texanu~ Intensive studies of fishes in this river system began in the <br />early 1960's (Banks 1964; Vanicek 1967), and it was bel ieved that young <br />Colorado squawfish moved little from their spawning site (Holden 1977). A <br />drift phenomenon for these fishes was not hypothesized in literature until <br />the completion of the Colorado River Fisheries Project (CRFP) in 1981. In <br />that report. Tyus et .11. (1982) suggested the possibil ity of drift by larval <br />Colorado squawfish from suspected spawning areas to confirmed nursery areas <br />located a considerable distance downstream. <br />'. <br />Small mesh drift nets designed to capture drifting ichthyofauna were <br />first used in the rivers of the upper baSin to locate spawning areas of <br />endangered fish species. Haynes et ale (1984) first conducted drift studies <br />in the upper Colorado River within Colorado. and in the Yampa River. starting <br />in 1979; and Radant et .11. (1983) used drift nets in the White River as part <br />of the Colorado squawfish investigations within the state of Utah. The <br />increase in water withdrawal s, flow modifications, and hydropower projects <br />in the upper Colorado River Basin have prompted further study. <br /> <br />Freshw. B101. <br /> <br />i8 1n the <br />atom <br />5-275. <br /> <br />567 <br /> <br />~ 1986 <br /> <br />Journal of Freshwater Ecology, Volume 3. Number 4 - December. 1986 <br />Copyright 0 1986 by Oikos Publishers. Inc. <br />