Laserfiche WebLink
<br />milieu. Examples of these parameters are species or guild <br />abundance, richness and diversity. <br /> <br />The functional, or dynamic, aspects of the system can <br />be described by such parameters as production, <br />respiration, and nutrient cycling (decomposition pathway). <br />Interactions between system components can best be <br />described in terms of processes or rates which reflect <br />energy flow and the interaction within the biotic <br />components as well as with the driving environmental <br />variables. Thus, processes as well as structural factors <br />must be considered as quantitative descriptors of the <br />system. <br /> <br />Physical or environmental variables are seldom <br />constant, but may oscillate over time (Figure 4). <br />Biological components of the system exist within the <br />constraints of physical factors and respond with <br />oscillations in populations, production, and other <br />processes (Figure 5). Irregardless of these system <br />behavioral changes, the trajectory of this behavior can be <br />predicted, and one can identify a stability zone within <br />which the variance in system behavior is expected to lie. <br />This behavior can be used as a quantitative descriptor of <br />the ecosystem. <br /> <br />EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FACTORS <br /> <br />There are four major sources or external inputs into <br />the White River in the study area: (a) direct atmospheric <br />contribution, (b) surface flow from the adjacent <br />watershed, (c) upstream contribution, and (d) accrual <br />(springs). The impact of these external sources of water, <br />materials, and energy is both direct and indirect. <br />Various substances enter the White River system through <br /> <br />the air-water interface (Table 1). <br /> <br />The introduction of these products from the <br />atmosphere as well as from the watershed can provide the <br />driving forces upon which this river system operates. For <br />example, during a series of storms in March and April, <br />1979, 1.02 inches of precipitation fell. As a result, <br />flows in the White River increased from 1,000 cfs to 1,800 <br />cfs and total suspended solids increased from 200 mg/l to <br />4,500 mg/l, thus decreasing light penetration and <br />decreasing net photosynthesis by the benthic algae. In <br />general, one of the dominant overriding, external factors <br />regulating the river is its arid climate and seasonal <br /> <br />267 <br />