Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LEVEL I <br /> <br />MEASURE PARAMETER <br />AND CALCULATE <br />APPROPRIATE <br />RELATIONSHIPS <br /> <br />LEVEL II <br /> <br /> <br />LEVEL III <br /> <br />CHANGE DUE TO MAN- <br />INDUCED IMPACT - <br />BEGIN INVESTIGATIONS <br />OF SOURCe <br /> <br />NOTIFY APPRO- <br />PRIATE <br />AGENCIES OR <br />COMPANIES <br /> <br /> <br />INITIATE APPROPRIATE <br />YES --f COR!',cen VE ACTI ON <br /> <br />Figure 12. Flow model of environmental <br />analysis and contingency planning. <br /> <br />light vs. primary production among others. These data <br />are used in MONITOR. Data which fall outside the <br />allowable range (acceptable confidence limits) or cause a <br />significant change in the particular ecosystem <br />relationship of intere~~ are flagged. For those <br />parameters satisfying the model requirements of normality, <br />no further action would be taken. If a parameter did not <br />satisfy the criteria for normality, the next step in <br />contingency planning should occur. <br /> <br />Level II. For relationships deviating from the allowable <br />range as defined by the model, the next level of analysis <br />begins. In this case, subsets of the structural and <br />functional characteristics of ecosystem <br />(biological/physical) parameters are considered. These <br />are compared with the baseline data base and the <br />ecological literature. If the deviation can be explained <br />by a change in a driving variable, a co-relationship with <br />other ecosystem parameters, or from the literature, the <br />model can be refined to include this relationship. If the <br />deviation cannot be explained in this manner, the last <br />step of analysis occurs. <br /> <br />Level III: Having failed to explain the deviation by <br /> <br />283 <br />