Laserfiche WebLink
<br />202 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />COGGINS ET AL. <br /> <br />every unmarked fish captured received a tag (the same <br />ma., is used both to decrement 0 and to increment M). <br />Note further that multiple recaptures of individual fish <br />within each year are counted as only one recapture <br />event (this model works on annual steps). <br />To make specific predictions of 0 and M for <br />comparison with the data, we must estimate boundary <br />conditions Ma.l for all a, Oa,1 for all a in year 1, and <br />new recruits U2., for t > .1. The initial numbers of <br />marked fish are obviously Ma,l = 0 for all,a. There are <br />two choices for dealing with the U boundary <br />conditions: (1) "forward propagation," in which the <br />initial abundance at age and recruitment (Oland 02 ) <br />a. ,I <br />are treated as unknowns to be estimated; and (2) <br />"backward propagation," in which the oldest age in <br />each year (OA) and all ages in the terminal y~ (Oa,T) <br />are treated as the unknowns and the other U are <br />a,1 <br />calculated using the backward recursion or a VP A <br />e,quation based on solving equation (1) for Oa.1 given <br />U 0+1,'+1' that is, <br /> <br />Ua" = (Ua+1,'+1/Sa) + ma,l. (3) <br /> <br />In using the backward propagation approach in ASMR, <br />it is safe to treat 0 A,l as 0 for all t if A is sufficiently <br />beyond the oldest age that fish can attain, and we are <br />left with estimating the number of unmarked fish in the <br />terminal year, Oa,T' <br />Using the predictions of the numbers at risk of <br />capture from equations (1-3), we then calculate the <br />expected numbers of unmarked and marked fish <br />captured by age and year as follows: <br /> <br />ma I = Ua.,jJa, <br />, ., <br /> <br />Ta,z = Ma"Pa,/l <br /> <br />where P a,' is the estimated age- and time-s~ecific <br />capture probability. We assume, conditional on S and <br />P I' that the observations m and r rep~sent <br />a, a,1 a,l <br />independent samples from Poisson distributions with <br />means given by equations (4) and (5). This is the same <br />as assuming independent binomial sampling of in- <br />dividuals in each 0- and M-age subpopulation with <br />sample capture probability P a,I' Ignoring terms in- <br />volving only the data, the Poisson assumption leads to <br />the log-likelihood function <br />A T <br />log"L(m,rI9) = 2: 2:[-ma,1 + ma"loge(ma,,)] <br />a=l ,=1 <br />A T <br />+ 2: 2:[-Ta" + ra"loge(Ta,,)] (6) <br />a=l 1=2 <br /> <br />where 9 is the parameter vector to be estimated. <br />Following Lorenzen (2000), we defined an age- <br />dependent survival function based on a von Bertalanffy <br /> <br />growth function (von Bertalanffy 1938). This formula- <br />tion allows mortality to decrease with age to a minimum <br />defined by MadUl<' the instantaneous mortality rate <br />suffered by fish that have reached asymptotic length. <br />We obtained an independent estimate of the von <br />Bertalanffy k from growth data presented in the <br />USFWS humpback chub recovery goals (USFWS <br />2002; see below). The resulting "Lorenzen model" <br />(Lorenzen 2000) allows age-specific survival to be <br />estimated with one unknown parameter, Madull, as <br /> <br />S = [e"(a+1) _l]i4"'."/k <br />a eka _ 1 (7) <br /> <br />The two remammg model specification issues are <br />estimation of the unmarked fish in the terminal year to <br />initialize the back propagation (i.e., 0 '1') and estima- <br />a, <br />tion of the age- and time-specific capture probabilities <br />P . We define three alternative formulations of the <br />a,l <br />ASMR model to incorporate various options. <br /> <br />Specific Models <br /> <br />ASMR 1 <br /> <br />In ASMR 1, we calculate the age- and time-specific <br />capture probability as Pa.1 = p,va,,' where Va,l is the age- <br />and time-specific vulnerability to capture gear and P, is <br />the conditional maximum likelihood estimate of annual <br />capture probability, which is calculated as <br />A A <br />p, = 2)ma,z + ra,z)/ 'L)a,,(Ua,z + Ma,z). (8) <br />a=l a=l <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />Following standard fisheries virtual population analysis <br />techniques (Hilborn and Walters 1992), we estimate the <br />abundance of unmarked fish in the terminal year to <br />initialize the back propagation as Oa,T =:: m a,Tlp a,1 This <br />leaves the parameter vector 9 = (Va,I' Madull, and PT) to <br />be estimated using nonlinear search routines to <br />maximize equation (6). To further restrict the problem, <br />it is possible to assume that Va,1 = 1 for all ages older <br />than a specified age (i.e., all fish older than a specified <br />age are equally vulnerable to capture). It is also <br />possible to estimate identical Va,1 schedules for blocks <br />of years that have similar sampling intensities (see <br />Coggins et al. 2006). <br /> <br />ASMR 2 <br /> <br />ASMR 2 differs from ASMR 1 only in the <br />initialization of the terminal abundances and in the <br />calculation of the terminal capture probability. Instead <br />of estimating an overall terminal capture probability <br />(fiT)' we directly estimate terminal abundances (Oa,r)' <br />ASMR 2 maximizes equation (6) by varying 9 = (Val' <br />Madu1t, and Oa;)' ' <br /> <br />(5) <br />