<br />3.10
<br />
<br />CHAPTER 15
<br />
<br />and Las Vegas dace), 16 are listed as federally endangered, 6 are listed as federally
<br />threatened, and 13 have either been proposed for federal listing or are under
<br />review for federal listing. In all, 35 native fishes (65% of the total number) receive
<br />legal protection under the ESA; except for one, the Gila topminnow, all are
<br />endemic to the system. Several of the remaining native fishes are variously
<br />protected by one or more basin states. Of the federally protected fishes, 29 occur
<br />only in the lower Colorado River basin (Arizona, California, Nevada, and New
<br />Mexico), 2 occur only in the upper Colorado River basin (Colorado, Utah, and
<br />Wyoming), and 4 occurred in both the upper and lower basins. The two extinct
<br />fishes occurred in the lower basin. Researchers have attributed the decline of
<br />native fishes to (1) modification and loss of habitat and (2) introduction of
<br />nonnative species (Stanford and Ward 1986b). Typically, these two factors occur
<br />together and have synergistic adverse effects.
<br />Closure of Hoover Dam in 1935 marked the end of the free-flowing Colorado
<br />River. Since then, the basin has become one of the most altered and controlled
<br />river systems in the United States. Dam construction and regulation have
<br />drastically altered physical and biological features of the river system (Stanford
<br />and Ward 19800), and, as a result, native fishes inhabiting the larger river channels
<br />have been severely impacted. Biologists are just beginning to recognize the
<br />detrimental effects of the spread of nonnative riparian vegetation on stream widths
<br />and, therefore, fish habitat in the basin.
<br />Since the late 1800s, approximately 67 fish species have been successfully
<br />introduced into the basin, raising the total number of species to over 100 (Carlson
<br />and Muth 1989). Most of these introductions resulted from efforts to establish
<br />sport fisheries in and downstream of newly created reservoirs. Several authors
<br />have noted adverse impacts of introduced nonnative species on native fishes of
<br />the basin. Invoking the island biogeography theory, Molles (1980) proposed that,
<br />because the Colorado River basin is an insular system, the native fish fauna is
<br />especially vulnerable to invasion by nonnative fish species. Using local extirpa-
<br />tions of native fishes in the lower basin as examples, he suggested that successful
<br />invasions can cause removal of native fishes through competitive replacement or
<br />predation.
<br />Of the basin's 16 federally endangered fishes, the bony tail, Pahranagat roundtail
<br />chub, Virgin River roundtail chub, woundfin, Colorado squawfish, razorback
<br />sucker, desert pupfish, and Gila topminnow are currently being maintained at
<br />Dexter National Fish Hatchery, New Mexico (Johnson and Jensen 1991). Since
<br />1974, the Dexter hatchery has served as a refuge and propagation facility for
<br />several rare and imperiled native fishes of the American Southwest. Personnel
<br />from the Dexter facility have assisted in development of similar programs
<br />elsewhere in North America and in other countries.
<br />Despite the severely perturbed state of the basin, threats of additional water
<br />development, and in some cases years of research and volumes of data, efforts to
<br />recover the federally protected fishes by direct management of wild populations or
<br />their habitats have been limited. In the lower basin, where river habitat degrada-
<br />tion and fish extirpation has been especially severe, recovery work has empha-
<br />sized acquisition of habitats and brood stocks, propagation, and reintroduction.
<br />Hatchery brood stocks of the threatened Apache trout and endangered Gila trout
<br />now exist, fish are being reintroduced, and several new stream populations have
<br />been established. Since 1981, young razorback sucker have been reintroduced
<br />
|