<br />Joseph H. Connell
<br />
<br />About every 5 years they escape from
<br />smaller predators; they may then survive
<br />for 15 years or so before being eaten by
<br />larger predators.
<br />
<br />Where is competition prevented
<br />by physical conditions?
<br />On land. In certain very harsh deserts,
<br />the germination of seeds and the estab-
<br />lishment of seedlings of perennial plants
<br />may be prevented by the absence of rain-
<br />fall for many years. For example, in cen-
<br />tral Australia, Acacia aneura produces
<br />viable seeds in most years, but no seed-
<br />lings get established. In the occasional
<br />years when rainfall is higher, seedlings
<br />may survive longer, but are usually de-
<br />stroyed by insects. Only if at least three
<br />successive years of higher than normal
<br />rainfall occurs will a crop of seedlings
<br />become established; this happens about
<br />every 40 to 50 years, judged by the age
<br />structure of the trees. Then competition
<br />for water between the seedlings ensues,
<br />and some may die (Slatyer, 1975). The
<br />population of Acacia aneura thus consists
<br />of widely spaced year-classes, produced by
<br />occasional escapes during rare periods of
<br />mild weather.
<br />In aquatic habitats. Near the upper
<br />margin of their distribution in the inter-
<br />tidal zone, marine organisms are exposed
<br />for long periods to extreme and variable
<br />weather; young colonists are usually killed
<br />by the harsh physical conditions. Evidence
<br />for this comes from various field experi-
<br />ments in which the conditions were im-
<br />proved at high levels. For example,
<br />Hatton (1938), Frank (1965), and Dayton
<br />(1971) arranged streams of sea water
<br />above the intertidal zone; algae and bar-
<br />
<br />474
<br />
<br />nacles survived much higher than usual
<br />in these streams. Barnacles survived better
<br />under shades set up by Hatton (1938) on
<br />the upper shore. Conversely, barnacles
<br />transplanted to higher levels quickly died
<br />(Hatton, 1938; Foster, 1971); the smaller
<br />barnacles died before the larger ones. In
<br />general, younger or smaller individuals
<br />are more vulnerable to harsh physical
<br />conditions. This is probably a conse-
<br />quence of the greater surface-to-volume
<br />ratio of smaller individuals; they are rela-
<br />tively more exposed than larger ones to
<br />such hazards of the ex.ternal environment
<br />as desiccation, increased radiation, ex-
<br />treme temperatures, fresh water, etc.
<br />(Lewis, 1964).
<br />Weather being variable, there will occur
<br />periods when the harsh conditions are
<br />temporarily ameliorated. If favorable
<br />conditions last long enough, the young
<br />colonists may reach a size where they can
<br />survive the usual harsh weather. Many
<br />marine species at higher latitudes have
<br />short seasons of breeding and settlement
<br />each year, so that such "escapes" may
<br />happen only once every few years. For
<br />example, out of four year-classes of the
<br />barnacle Balanus balanoides that I ob-
<br />served at high shore levels, survival was
<br />high in only one, so that the population
<br />was composed mainly of the survivors of
<br />that year-class (Connell, 1961a, Figure
<br />12). Other examples of populations domi-
<br />nated by older year-classes at high shore
<br />levels are three species of barnacles stud-
<br />ied by Foster (1971) and a limpet, Acmaea
<br />sea bra, studied by Sutherland (1970).
<br />An interesting example for marine
<br />algae is given by Kain (1963). The physi-
<br />cal conditions in the sublittoral zone de-
<br />
<br />
<br />16 Producing Structure in Natural
<br />Communities
<br />
<br />teriorate as the light intensity diminishes
<br />with depth. Atthe lower limits of distribu-
<br />tion of two populations of the large sea-
<br />weed Laminaria hyperborea, the growth
<br />rate and population density diminished,
<br />and the age distribution consisted of
<br />dominant year-groups. In contrast, the
<br />shallower populations showed little evi-
<br />dence of such dominant age groups. Re-
<br />cruitment evidently happens inter-
<br />mittently in the populations near the
<br />lower edge of the range. Kain (1963) felt
<br />that recruitment occurred only occa-
<br />sionally when the conditions become tem-
<br />porarily favorable, but there is no direct
<br />evidence in support of this suggestion.
<br />
<br />What Determines When
<br />Competition Will Occur?
<br />
<br />
<br />The evidence from controlled field ex-
<br />periments on the occurrence of competi-
<br />tion and on the instances when it is pre-
<br />vented by predation or harsh weather has
<br />now been reviewed. It seems clear that
<br />competition is often prevented by preda-
<br />tion, less often by harsh physical condi-
<br />tions. In fact, so many instances have been
<br />demonstrated by controlled field experi-
<br />ments, in contrast to being simply sug-
<br />gested by correlations, that I suggest the
<br />following priority be followed in adopting
<br />simplifying assumptions to use in models
<br />of community structure.
<br />Predation should be regarded as being
<br />of primary importance, either directly
<br />determining the species composition or in
<br />preventing competitive exclusion, except
<br />where the effect of predation is reduced
<br />for some reason. There seem to be two
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />475
<br />
<br />principal situations in which predation is
<br />reduced, both the result of evolution of
<br />defensive adaptations by the prey.
<br />1. Some prey species have evolved the
<br />ability to live in refuges that the predator
<br />cannot invade, either because the condi-
<br />tions are too harsh for the predator or the
<br />habitat structure too difficult to search.
<br />Outside the refuges the prey are eaten,
<br />e.g., Balanus glandula on the middle and
<br />lower seashore or larger zooplankton in
<br />open waters. The highest levels on the
<br />shore provide a refuge where the preda-
<br />tors cannot drill and consume a barnacle
<br />during the short period at high tide. In the
<br />dense vegetation of ponds the fish cannot
<br />effectively search for zooplankton.
<br />There is a great difference in the rela-
<br />tive abundance and species composition
<br />of the zooplankton or benthic inverte-
<br />brates in lakes with or without large pred-
<br />ators such as fish or amphibians. Large
<br />species of zooplankters or benthic inverte-
<br />brates are eliminated where these large
<br />predators are present. These larger inver-
<br />tebrates must have evolved in lakes with-
<br />out fish, and depend for their existence on
<br />the fact that these larger vertebrate pred-
<br />ators have low rates of movement between
<br />lakes and so have not reached many small
<br />lakes. Only in recent years have they done
<br />so, thanks to the stocking by government
<br />fishery departments.
<br />This category of species protected by
<br />refuges includes many prey species that
<br />are smaller than their predators. They
<br />may exist as "fugitive" species, invading
<br />isolated patches of habitat such as lakes
<br />or islands before their preda tors, which
<br />have lower powers of dispersal. Alterna-
<br />tively, they live in the same habitat but
<br />
<br />
<br />\!
<br />
<br />-----~
<br />
|