Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Joseph H. Connell <br /> <br />About every 5 years they escape from <br />smaller predators; they may then survive <br />for 15 years or so before being eaten by <br />larger predators. <br /> <br />Where is competition prevented <br />by physical conditions? <br />On land. In certain very harsh deserts, <br />the germination of seeds and the estab- <br />lishment of seedlings of perennial plants <br />may be prevented by the absence of rain- <br />fall for many years. For example, in cen- <br />tral Australia, Acacia aneura produces <br />viable seeds in most years, but no seed- <br />lings get established. In the occasional <br />years when rainfall is higher, seedlings <br />may survive longer, but are usually de- <br />stroyed by insects. Only if at least three <br />successive years of higher than normal <br />rainfall occurs will a crop of seedlings <br />become established; this happens about <br />every 40 to 50 years, judged by the age <br />structure of the trees. Then competition <br />for water between the seedlings ensues, <br />and some may die (Slatyer, 1975). The <br />population of Acacia aneura thus consists <br />of widely spaced year-classes, produced by <br />occasional escapes during rare periods of <br />mild weather. <br />In aquatic habitats. Near the upper <br />margin of their distribution in the inter- <br />tidal zone, marine organisms are exposed <br />for long periods to extreme and variable <br />weather; young colonists are usually killed <br />by the harsh physical conditions. Evidence <br />for this comes from various field experi- <br />ments in which the conditions were im- <br />proved at high levels. For example, <br />Hatton (1938), Frank (1965), and Dayton <br />(1971) arranged streams of sea water <br />above the intertidal zone; algae and bar- <br /> <br />474 <br /> <br />nacles survived much higher than usual <br />in these streams. Barnacles survived better <br />under shades set up by Hatton (1938) on <br />the upper shore. Conversely, barnacles <br />transplanted to higher levels quickly died <br />(Hatton, 1938; Foster, 1971); the smaller <br />barnacles died before the larger ones. In <br />general, younger or smaller individuals <br />are more vulnerable to harsh physical <br />conditions. This is probably a conse- <br />quence of the greater surface-to-volume <br />ratio of smaller individuals; they are rela- <br />tively more exposed than larger ones to <br />such hazards of the ex.ternal environment <br />as desiccation, increased radiation, ex- <br />treme temperatures, fresh water, etc. <br />(Lewis, 1964). <br />Weather being variable, there will occur <br />periods when the harsh conditions are <br />temporarily ameliorated. If favorable <br />conditions last long enough, the young <br />colonists may reach a size where they can <br />survive the usual harsh weather. Many <br />marine species at higher latitudes have <br />short seasons of breeding and settlement <br />each year, so that such "escapes" may <br />happen only once every few years. For <br />example, out of four year-classes of the <br />barnacle Balanus balanoides that I ob- <br />served at high shore levels, survival was <br />high in only one, so that the population <br />was composed mainly of the survivors of <br />that year-class (Connell, 1961a, Figure <br />12). Other examples of populations domi- <br />nated by older year-classes at high shore <br />levels are three species of barnacles stud- <br />ied by Foster (1971) and a limpet, Acmaea <br />sea bra, studied by Sutherland (1970). <br />An interesting example for marine <br />algae is given by Kain (1963). The physi- <br />cal conditions in the sublittoral zone de- <br /> <br /> <br />16 Producing Structure in Natural <br />Communities <br /> <br />teriorate as the light intensity diminishes <br />with depth. Atthe lower limits of distribu- <br />tion of two populations of the large sea- <br />weed Laminaria hyperborea, the growth <br />rate and population density diminished, <br />and the age distribution consisted of <br />dominant year-groups. In contrast, the <br />shallower populations showed little evi- <br />dence of such dominant age groups. Re- <br />cruitment evidently happens inter- <br />mittently in the populations near the <br />lower edge of the range. Kain (1963) felt <br />that recruitment occurred only occa- <br />sionally when the conditions become tem- <br />porarily favorable, but there is no direct <br />evidence in support of this suggestion. <br /> <br />What Determines When <br />Competition Will Occur? <br /> <br /> <br />The evidence from controlled field ex- <br />periments on the occurrence of competi- <br />tion and on the instances when it is pre- <br />vented by predation or harsh weather has <br />now been reviewed. It seems clear that <br />competition is often prevented by preda- <br />tion, less often by harsh physical condi- <br />tions. In fact, so many instances have been <br />demonstrated by controlled field experi- <br />ments, in contrast to being simply sug- <br />gested by correlations, that I suggest the <br />following priority be followed in adopting <br />simplifying assumptions to use in models <br />of community structure. <br />Predation should be regarded as being <br />of primary importance, either directly <br />determining the species composition or in <br />preventing competitive exclusion, except <br />where the effect of predation is reduced <br />for some reason. There seem to be two <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />475 <br /> <br />principal situations in which predation is <br />reduced, both the result of evolution of <br />defensive adaptations by the prey. <br />1. Some prey species have evolved the <br />ability to live in refuges that the predator <br />cannot invade, either because the condi- <br />tions are too harsh for the predator or the <br />habitat structure too difficult to search. <br />Outside the refuges the prey are eaten, <br />e.g., Balanus glandula on the middle and <br />lower seashore or larger zooplankton in <br />open waters. The highest levels on the <br />shore provide a refuge where the preda- <br />tors cannot drill and consume a barnacle <br />during the short period at high tide. In the <br />dense vegetation of ponds the fish cannot <br />effectively search for zooplankton. <br />There is a great difference in the rela- <br />tive abundance and species composition <br />of the zooplankton or benthic inverte- <br />brates in lakes with or without large pred- <br />ators such as fish or amphibians. Large <br />species of zooplankters or benthic inverte- <br />brates are eliminated where these large <br />predators are present. These larger inver- <br />tebrates must have evolved in lakes with- <br />out fish, and depend for their existence on <br />the fact that these larger vertebrate pred- <br />ators have low rates of movement between <br />lakes and so have not reached many small <br />lakes. Only in recent years have they done <br />so, thanks to the stocking by government <br />fishery departments. <br />This category of species protected by <br />refuges includes many prey species that <br />are smaller than their predators. They <br />may exist as "fugitive" species, invading <br />isolated patches of habitat such as lakes <br />or islands before their preda tors, which <br />have lower powers of dispersal. Alterna- <br />tively, they live in the same habitat but <br /> <br /> <br />\! <br /> <br />-----~ <br />