Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Joseph H. Connell <br /> <br />478 <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />c. !.!! ~ PHYSICAL <br />CONDITlONS: <br /> <br />4b YOUNG DOMINANTS SVRVIvt llEL.L <br />SI~C[ TH! Ptn'SlCAL CXlstlITIOlilS <br />ARE KARSH ENOUGH TO JUDUCE <br />THE EFFECTIVENESS OF !V.nrML <br />'ENEMI IS. BIl'T NOT SO Stn:RL AS <br />TO DtSnOY THE PREY. <br /> <br />But occasionally. certain <br />species of natural enemies <br />are reduced <br />.j. <br /> <br />!Ie THEN THE YOl'NG DOHIN,u,'T <br />SPECIES WHICH IS THE <br />PREY or THAT PAR.TlCULAJl <br />NATURAL ENDrY SURVIVES <br />TO A.\' 'INVULNERABLE' SIZE <br /> <br />1. PATC~ IS REEStABLISHED, ~'ITH THAT <br />DOHI~M"T SPECIES A)."D ITS A.SSOClATtS <br /> <br />Fi~re t A model of the mechanisms determining <br /> <br />wh!ch "do~inants" (large plants or sessile aquatic <br /> <br />ammals) WIll fill a gap. See lext for further discus- <br />sion. <br /> <br />settled or young individuals are killed by <br />~arsh ,,:eather each year so that the patch <br />IS conlInually being colonized and va- <br />cated; this cycle is shown between steps <br />3 and 4a. They survive only in particularly <br />f~vorable years, and then may live a long <br />lIme. Populations consist of dominant <br />year-groups, the survivors from these oc- <br />casional favorable years. Beca use they oc- <br />c.upy more and more space as they con- <br />lI~ue to grow, they exclude and may <br />dIsplace other organisms (steps Sa to 6). <br /> <br />In other words, once two or more individ- <br />uals are past the vulnerable young stage, <br />they may compete with one another. <br />However, in many cases these populations <br />never get dense enough to compete for <br />resources. <br /> <br />In benign environments, natural ene- <br />mies tend to be much more effective <br />(Connell, 1971) and most colonists are <br />eaten. This tends to reduce competition <br />and also to prevent the growth to an in- <br />,'ulnerable size of the young dominants. <br /> <br />16 Producing Structure in Natural <br />Communities <br /> <br />If the populations of grazers or predators <br />are not reduced by some external event, <br />they are capable of keeping the patch in <br />this state of continual recolonization (the <br />cycle between steps 3 and 4c). <br />However, if some unpredictable event, <br />such as a short spell of bad weather or <br />an attack by their own predators or path- <br />ogens, reduces the population of these <br />natural enemies, the prey will have a pe- <br />riod of good survival and growth. This <br />then allows whichever dominant species <br />happens to be present to grow to an in- <br />vulnerable size (step 5c). Which, if any, <br />do so depends upon which natural"enemy <br />is reduced and whether the reduction lasts <br />for a long enough period. Once the prey <br />reaches invulnerable size. it excludes or <br />displaces other organisms by further <br />growth (steps Sc to 6). The situation then <br />returns to the original state (steps 6 to 1) <br />as "sheltering" species colonize the area <br />beneath the dominant. <br />In intermediate environments there is <br />less mortality from harsh weather and <br />natural enemies are less effective, so that <br />the young of dominant species more read- <br />ily escape being eaten. Thus these young <br />dominants may reach high population <br />densities and begin to compete with one <br />another. The eventual winner, i.e., the <br />dominant that eventually fills the space, <br />is likely to be the one able to displace the <br />others during a period of competition <br />(steps 4b and 5b). <br />Which species of dominant will succeed <br />in filling the vacated patch depends upon <br />several things. For example, in benign <br />regions such as the lower seashore there <br />are more species of predators, and some, <br /> <br />479 <br /> <br />such as starfish, are quite large and able <br />to eat grazers and smaller predators as <br />well as the dominant sedentary animals <br />(Paine, 1966; Menge, 1972). Thus starfish <br />tend to reduce both animal dominants <br />and grazers. Plants should therefore be <br />favored, since both their competitors and <br />their natural enemies are being reduced. <br />This may be the reason why, in temperate <br />latitudes over the world, plants rather <br />than animals are the dominant organisms <br />covering the lower seashore. They form <br />the "su blitloral fringe" in Stephenson and <br />Stephenson's (1949) universal scheme of <br />zonation. In contrast, at middle shore lev- <br />els, large predators such as starfish are less <br />common; the main predators are muricid <br />snails. They feed much more heavily on <br />sedentary animals such as mussels and <br />barnacles than on grazing molluscs, so <br />that grazers are less likely to be reduced <br />than they were at lower shore levels. This <br />means that both plant and animal domi- <br />nants are under attack, so that no a priori <br />prediction can be made as to which will <br />succeed in fil1ing the vacated patches of <br />rock surface. Barnacles, mussels, tube <br />worms, oysters, and various algal spe- <br />cies-all may occur as dominants in mid- <br />dle shore zones. <br /> <br />What Determines Realized Niches <br />and Community Structure? <br /> <br />The distribution and abundance in <br />which one finds a species, as opposed to <br />its potential area and population size, is <br />obviously not determined solely by com- <br />petition. Therefore the variables that. con- <br />strain the realized niche of a species <br /> <br /> <br />~-~~~~ <br />