My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7104
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:30:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7104
Author
Green, B. and M. Butler.
Title
Analysis of Channel Maintenance and Flushing Flows in the Colorado River at the Palisade Habitat Site (Appendix B).
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />An analysis of discharges required to flush fine sediment from the <br />Palisades IFIM site was performed using the method described by <br />Milhous. Graphs of the Beta movement parameter versus discharge at <br />cross sections 1 and 3 (Figure 1) were prepared for the dSO <br />material size of 72 rom as shown in the report by Simons (Figure 2). <br />Hydraulic radius is calculated using the conveyance area divided by <br />the top width, and the energy slope for each discharge is from the <br />Water Surface Profile (WSP) program of PHABSIM. Energy slope is <br />taken directly from WSP for cross section 1 and computed for cross <br />section 3 (Figure 3). The energy slope at cross section 3 is <br />computed by dividing the change in total energy from section 4 to 2 <br />by the distance between the cross sections. The calculated Beta <br />movement parameters for cross sections 1 and 3 are in Tables land <br />2, and Table 3 shows the computed energy slopes for cross section <br />3 . <br /> <br />The maximum discharge measurement used to define the stage- <br />discharge relati.onship is 10,060 cfs. A number of WSP runs were <br />made in order to calculate the Beta movement parameter. However, <br />the calibrat~_on becomes uncertain for flows greater than 12,000 <br />cfs. A discharge measurement greater than 12,000 cfs is needed to <br />make the WSP calibration more reliable for flows greater than <br />12,000 cfs. <br /> <br />Examination of the graph at cross section 1 for the dSO size <br />(Figure 1) shows the Beta movement parameter is above 0.021 for the <br />1,500 to 8,000 cfs discharge range. The parameter is near 0.020 <br />for discharges between 8,000 and 12,090 cfs and then increases to <br />0.021 above 13,000 cfs. Cross section 1 thus appears to have fines <br />flushed from the substrate over a'wide range of flows. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.