Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />An analysis of discharges required to flush fine sediment from the <br />Palisades IFIM site was performed using the method described by <br />Milhous. Graphs of the Beta movement parameter versus discharge at <br />cross sections 1 and 3 (Figure 1) were prepared for the dSO <br />material size of 72 rom as shown in the report by Simons (Figure 2). <br />Hydraulic radius is calculated using the conveyance area divided by <br />the top width, and the energy slope for each discharge is from the <br />Water Surface Profile (WSP) program of PHABSIM. Energy slope is <br />taken directly from WSP for cross section 1 and computed for cross <br />section 3 (Figure 3). The energy slope at cross section 3 is <br />computed by dividing the change in total energy from section 4 to 2 <br />by the distance between the cross sections. The calculated Beta <br />movement parameters for cross sections 1 and 3 are in Tables land <br />2, and Table 3 shows the computed energy slopes for cross section <br />3 . <br /> <br />The maximum discharge measurement used to define the stage- <br />discharge relati.onship is 10,060 cfs. A number of WSP runs were <br />made in order to calculate the Beta movement parameter. However, <br />the calibrat~_on becomes uncertain for flows greater than 12,000 <br />cfs. A discharge measurement greater than 12,000 cfs is needed to <br />make the WSP calibration more reliable for flows greater than <br />12,000 cfs. <br /> <br />Examination of the graph at cross section 1 for the dSO size <br />(Figure 1) shows the Beta movement parameter is above 0.021 for the <br />1,500 to 8,000 cfs discharge range. The parameter is near 0.020 <br />for discharges between 8,000 and 12,090 cfs and then increases to <br />0.021 above 13,000 cfs. Cross section 1 thus appears to have fines <br />flushed from the substrate over a'wide range of flows. <br /> <br />6 <br />