Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1364 <br /> <br />BESTGEN ET AL. <br /> <br />Yampa River <br /> <br />~~~ ~ <br /> <br /> <br />1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 <br /> <br />Cl) <br />u <br />~ <br />ce <br />"0 <br />~ <br />:::I <br />..0 <br />ce <br />is: <br />o <br />~ <br />~ <br />'S <br />Cl) <br />~ <br />'0.. <br />o <br />"0 <br />ce <br />..... <br />o <br />"0 <br />u <br /> <br />White River <br /> <br />1600~ ~ <br />1200 <br />800 <br />400 <br />o .... <br />1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 <br /> <br />Middle Green River <br /> <br />2000~ ~ <br />1500 <br />1000 <br />50g .,.. <br /> <br />1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 <br /> <br />1200 rCSOlatiOn-Graranyon <br /> <br /> <br />~j ~ ; i <br /> <br />2000 20Gl 2002 2003 <br /> <br />Lower Green River <br /> <br />600 <br />450 <br />300 <br />150 <br />o <br />2000 20Gl 2002 2003 <br /> <br /> <br />Green River Basin <br /> <br />5oo0~ ~ <br />3750 <br />2500 <br />125~ . -+. , <br /> <br />1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 <br /> <br />FIGURE 3,-Abundance of Colorado pikeminnow adults C?450 mm TL; filled diamonds) and recruits (400-449 mm; squares) <br />in the Yampa, White, middle Green, Desolation-Gray Canyon, and lower Green River reaches as well as the entire Green River <br />basin, Utah and Colorado, 2000-2003. Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals (which may be obscured by the <br />symbols in the case of recruits). The open diamond in the Green River basin panel includes the estimated abundance for the <br />unsampled Desolation-Gray Canyon and lower Green River reaches (2001 estimates); the open circle is the estimate for the <br />Yampa, White, and middle Green River reaches only. <br /> <br />slightly to 143 in 2003. The abundance estimates for <br />the middle Green River reach had the best precision of <br />all reaches studied, CVs ranging from 9% to 18%. The <br />relatively low CVs were due to the relatively large <br />number of captured and recaptured fish. <br />Colorado pikeminnow recruits in the middle Green <br />River reach were moderately abundant compared with <br />the other reaches sampled in 2000 and 2001 (107 and <br />133 individuals, respectively) but declined in 2002 and <br />2003. The confidence interval for the abundance <br />estimates of recruits in the middle Green River in <br />2001 did not overlap with those for 2002 and 2003. <br />Estimates of Colorado pikeminnow recruit abundance <br />in the middle Green River had CV s that ranged from <br />19% to 70%. <br />The abundance estimates for adult Colorado pike- <br />minnow in the Desolation-Gray Canyon reach of the <br />Green River and the lower Green River reach were <br />lower than that observed in the middle Green River <br />reach. The abundance of adult Colorado pikeminnow <br /> <br />in the Desolation-Gray Canyon reach was 699 in 2001 <br />and 621 in 2003, an 11 % decline over the study period. <br />However, pairs of point estimates had overlapping <br />confidence intervals and thus did not indicate signif- <br />icant differences. Regression of abundance as a <br />function of time (n = 3) showed a slightly negative <br />but nonsignificant relationship (loge [abundance] = <br />124.97 - 0.0592. year; r2 = 0.35, P = 0.595). The <br />number of unique animals captured declined from 208 <br />in 2001 to 99 and 100 in 2002 and 2003, respectively. <br />Abundance estimates in the Desolation-Gray Canyon <br />reach had moderately good precision (CV = 16-22%). <br />The Desolation-Gray Canyon reach consistently sup- <br />ported the highest average annual abundance of Colorado <br />pikeminnow recruits during the study period. Recruit <br />abundance was highest in 2001 (163 fish) and lowest in <br />2002 (72) in 2002; the confidence intervals overlapped in <br />all years. The CVs ranged from 20% to 39%. <br />The abundance of adult Colorado pikeminnow in the <br />lower Green River reach was the lowest of all Green <br />