Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br /> <br />STATUS OF GREEN RIVER COLORADO PIKEMINNOW <br /> <br />1357 <br /> <br />(95% confIdence interval, 2.900--3,707) but declined to 2,142 fish (1,686-2,598) by 2003, a 35% reduction. <br />However, accounting for a reach not sampled in 2000 makes it likely that the reduction was 48% over the <br />2000--2003 period. The abundance of recruits (400-449 mm) in the study area averaged 8.9% of adult <br />abundance. The annual survival rate for 2000--2003 was 0.65 (0.59-0.71), lower than the 0.82 rate estimated <br />for 1991-1999; mortality exceeded recruitment. The few captures and lack of recaptures of fish of at least 800 <br />mm suggest that apparent survival was low for large Colorado pikeminnow. The reduced abundance of adult <br />Colorado pikeminnow was due, in part, to the weak year-classes of age-O fish produced in the 1990s and the <br />reduced survival of recruits and adults in 2000--2003, Based on these results, downlisting of this species is not <br />warranted at this time. Better understanding of the factors that influence adult survival rates, abundance <br />dynamics, and the recruitment of early life stages as well as the effects of flow recommendations and <br />nonnative predaceous fishes would assist the conservation of Colorado pikeminnow. <br /> <br />Demographic parameters that describe birth, move- <br />ment, and mortality rates and population abundance are <br />useful for understanding the status and dynamics of <br />animal populations. The responses of populations to <br />biotic and abiotic drivers are of interest to ecologists <br />attempting to understand the fundamental basis for <br />population change. They are also useful to managers <br />attempting to maintain or enhance the abundance of <br />free-ranging animal populations. <br />The Colorado pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius is a <br />large, predaceous, and migratory cyprinid endemic to <br />the Colorado River basin that is listed as endangered <br />under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended <br />(U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1974). Once wide- <br />spread and abundant throughout warmwater reaches of <br />the basin, wild Colorado pikeminnow are presently <br />restricted to the San Juan, Colorado, and Green River <br />subbasins of the upper Colorado River basin. Reasons <br />for the decline of Colorado pikeminnow include habitat <br />alteration, river regulation, and the presence of <br />nonnative fishes (Minckley 1973; Carlson and Muth <br />1989; Tyus 1991). Over 140 main-stem and tributary <br />dams and reservoirs and several transbasin water <br />diversions provide water for agricultural and municipal <br />purposes to a rapidly expanding human population in <br />the Colorado River basin. As a result, the Colorado <br />River basin is one of the most tightly controlled water <br />supplies in the world (Ioms et al. 1965; Carlson and <br />Muth 1989). Main-stem dams have been particularly <br />damaging to biota because they restrict the movements <br />of mobile fishes such as Colorado pikeminnow, reduce <br />the seasonal variability of discharge, water tempera- <br />ture, and sediment load, and increase daily hydrograph <br />variation (Vanicek and Kramer 1969; Holden 1979; <br />Ward and Stanford 1979; Stanford et al. 1996; Poff et <br />al. 1997). No fewer than 60 nonnative fishes have been <br />established in the Colorado River basin, many of which <br />prey on or compete with various life stages of native <br />species (Carlson and Muth 1989; Ruppert et al. 1993; <br />Bestgen et al. 2006a; Olden et al. 2006). The outcome <br />of these environmental and biotic changes for the <br />highly endemic fish fauna of the Colorado River basin <br />has been dramatic: 2 of the 35 native species in the <br /> <br />basin are extinct, an additional 18 (including the <br />Colorado pikeminnow) are federally listed as threat- <br />ened or endangered or are very rare, and most others <br />are listed by one or more states in the basin as declining <br />(Stanford and Ward 1986; Carlson and Muth 1989; <br />Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002; Mueller and Marsh <br />2002; Valdez and Muth 2005). <br />Recovery of Colorado pikeminnow will require <br /> <br />a genetically and demographically viable, self- <br />sustaining population in the Green River subbasin; <br />and self-sustaining populations that meet or exceed <br />estimated carrying capacity either in the upper <br />Colorado River subbasin or in both the upper <br />Colorado River subbasin and San Juan River <br />subbasin. [U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service 2002.] <br /> <br />For the Colorado pikeminnow to be downlisted to <br />threatened status or delisted completely, three demo- <br />graphic criteria would have to be met in the Green <br />River subbasin over the specified monitoring period: <br />(1) the abundance estimates for adults (total length <br />[TL] , 2:450 mm) in both the middle and lower Green <br />River are not declining significantly, (2) the estimated <br />mean recruitment of fish 400-449 mm TL (e.g., <br />recruits) equals or exceeds the estimated mean annual <br />adult mortality for the subbasin, and (3) each <br />abundance estimate for the subbasin exceeds 2,600 <br />adults (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2002). We <br />report population abundance, survival, and recruitment <br />rates and population trends for Colorado pikeminnow <br />in the spatially extensive Green River subbasin based <br />on intensive capture-recapture data collected from <br />2000 to 2003 and additional interagency monitoring <br />data collected since 1991 and interpret those data in <br />light of present recovery goals for this species. <br /> <br />Status and Natural History of <br />Colorado Pikeminnow <br /> <br />The abundance of Colorado pikeminnow varies by <br />more than an order of magnitude in the three occupied <br />subbasins of the upper Colorado River basin. The wild <br />population in the San Juan River subbasin, which is <br />separated from the remainder of the upper Colorado <br />River basin by Lake Powell Reservoir, is relatively <br />