<br />1374
<br />
<br />evaluations did not suggest that electrofishing was
<br />harmful to Colorado pikeminnow. Controlled labora-
<br />tory studies (Meismer 1999) found minimal soft-tissue
<br />and vertebral damage from the electro fishing gear at
<br />intensities normally used for sampling sub adult
<br />Colorado pikeminnow (mean TL = 337 mm). An X-
<br />ray analysis of Colorado pikeminnow captured by
<br />electrofishing (n = 46) also suggested a low (7%)
<br />incidence of acute damage to vertebrae related to
<br />electrofishing capture, and no mortalities were ob-
<br />served (Hawkins 2002). Further, the recapture rates of
<br />Colorado pikeminnow tagged and released throughout
<br />the upper Colorado River basin were not different for
<br />groups of fish first captured by electro fishing compared
<br />with trammel or fyke nets (Hawkins 2003). A final and
<br />compelling reason that electro fishing was not a major
<br />reason for the increased mortality of Colorado pike-
<br />minnow in 2000-2003 is that the relatively high
<br />survival rate (0.82) estimated for Colorado pike-
<br />minnow in the Green River basin in 1991-1999
<br />pertained to fish that were captured and recaptured
<br />exclusively with electrofishing gear similar to that used
<br />during this study, albeit sampling intensity was higher
<br />in the recent period. Collectively, the information
<br />presented above suggests that the increased mortality
<br />of Colorado pikeminnow in the Green River basin in
<br />2000-2003 was caused by factors other than electro-
<br />fishing or handling. Future sampling may yield
<br />additional information on whether very large fish were
<br />present in the area during sampling and were simply
<br />difficult to capture, learned to avoid the capture gear,
<br />used habitat where capture gear was not effective, or
<br />were not present.
<br />Drought-reduced stream flows may also be a reason
<br />for the lower survival rates of Colorado pikeminnow in
<br />the Green River basin from 2000 to 2003. This may be
<br />particularly true in the White River, which was the
<br />smallest stream sampled during this study. Base flows
<br />were relatively low in all years from 2000 to 2003, and
<br />particularly so in 2002. For example, the mean monthly
<br />flow levels of the Green River at Jensen, Utah (U.S.
<br />Geological Survey gauge 09261000) in July 2000,
<br />2001,2002, and 2003 were the 8th, 3rd, 2nd, and 7th
<br />lowest, respectively, that have been recorded since
<br />gauge operation began in 1947; other years oflow July
<br />flows were 1961 (5th), 1963 (1st), 1989 (4th), and
<br />1994 (6th). Because summer base flows were typically
<br />higher in the postdam era than before, the occurrence
<br />of low summer base flows in 2000-2003 is particularly
<br />significant. The mean annual flows for water years
<br />2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 were the 19th, 7th, 2nd,
<br />and 9th lowest, respectively, that have been recorded in
<br />the 57-year period of record.
<br />The exact mechanisms for the increased mortality
<br />
<br />BESTGEN ET AL
<br />
<br />due to drought or variable declines in abundance over
<br />reaches are not apparent but could be decreased habitat
<br />size, the density-dependent effects of crowding pisciv-
<br />orous Colorado pikeminnow and other, nonnative
<br />predators into reduced habitat and thus reducing their
<br />food supply, the increased incidence of disease, and
<br />other, unknown factors. The poorer condition of
<br />Colorado pikeminnow in 2000-2003 than in 1991-
<br />1999 indicated by the differences in length-weight
<br />relationships in the two periods may be responsible, in
<br />part, for the reduced survival in drought-affected
<br />streams. Given the rather severe reductions in stream
<br />flow, perhaps the reduced abundance of Colorado
<br />pikeminnow in the Green River basin during the study
<br />period is not smprising.
<br />Reductions in habitat size may have also reduced
<br />survival by increasing the potential for encounters with
<br />predaceous nonnative fishes. Northern pike, which
<br />utilize the same deepwater habitat as Colorado pike-
<br />minnow and are abundant in the Yampa River and
<br />present in the middle Green River reach, have the
<br />potential to consume directly or to inflict fatal bite
<br />damage to large adult pikeminnow. Smallmouth bass
<br />Micropterus dolomieu have also increased dramatically
<br />in distribution and abundance in the upper Colorado
<br />River basin, including the Yampa and main-stem
<br />Green rivers. Smallmouth bass are documented
<br />predators on stocked endangered bony tail Gila elegans
<br />in the Green River and may be significant predators on
<br />other native fishes, particularly those smaller than
<br />about 200 mm TL (Bestgen et al. 2006b).
<br />
<br />Recruitment Rates
<br />Reduced recruitment may also be responsible, in
<br />part, for the decline of adult Colorado pikeminnow in
<br />the Green River basin. Recovery criteria define a
<br />recruit as a subadult Colorado pikeminnow 400-449
<br />mm TL (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2002). Based
<br />on expected growth of about 43 mm/year for Colorado
<br />pikeminnow in that size-class (Osmundson et al. 1997),
<br />the average recruit-size Colorado pikeminnow would
<br />become part ofthe adult population (2:450 mm TL) the
<br />following year. The expectation of this recovery goal is
<br />that recruitment will, over time, balance the mortality
<br />of adults to produce a stable adult population. The
<br />percentage of recruits in the samples collected during
<br />the period 2000-2003 (4.9-13.3%; Table 4) suggests
<br />that recruitment was not sufficient to offset the 35%
<br />apparent annual mortality rate (I - S = mortality X
<br />100) estimated for adult Colorado pikeminnow in the
<br />Green River basin.
<br />The number of recruits in ISMP samples in 2000-
<br />2003 was only 3.4% of the number of adults in the
<br />samples and much reduced from 1991-1999, when
<br />
<br />.
<br />
|