Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- Only trained personnel should perform quanti- <br />tative electrofishing. <br /> <br />Performance of electro fishing in lakes <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />- Use electrofishing in shallow and vegetated <br />areas at transparencies higher than 1 m. <br />- Fish by boat and place gasoline engines in a <br />separate boat. <br />- Pursue to handle the fish before it has recovered <br />from the electronarocosis. <br />- For population estimates use mark-recapture <br />methods and recapture the fish by methods <br />other than electrofishing. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Calculation of population estimates <br /> <br />- In the case of the removal method, use the <br />appropriate maximum likelihood estimator. <br />- Separate estimates for each species and size <br />class are made. <br />- If the population in a sampling area is smaller <br />than about 50, or if fewer than 3 removals have <br />been carried out, use the 'pooling' method (cfr. <br />examples 3 and 4). <br />- The smallest size class may be subjected to <br />large underestimation. For salmonids, special <br />attention is called for when a large population <br />fraction is smaller than about 50 mm. <br />- In large rivers, where the area in which quanti- <br />tative electrofishing only is possible in small <br />relative to the total stream area, estimation of <br />total population size is not possible by this <br />method. <br /> <br />Evaluation of results <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />- Generally, estimated population size or density <br />is lower than true population size (density). <br />- A low estimated catchability is a warning sign, <br />as the underestimation in this case probably is <br />large. Observe, however, that a large estimated <br />catchability is no guarantee that the under- <br />estimation is low. <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />r <br />i <br />r <br />f <br />f <br /> <br />- The degree of underestimation may vary with <br />fish species, fish size, fishing gear and fishing <br />conditions, e.g. biotope, temperature, water <br />flow, turbidity. <br />- Comparison of population densities can there- <br />fore only be relevant in specific situation (same <br />or similar fish species, biotope, gear etc.). <br />- In large rivers, population change in selected <br />areas over time should be estimated rather than <br />assessment of total population. <br /> <br />Recommendations concerning safety <br /> <br />- Electrofishing equipment should be approved <br />according to national standards. <br />- Only DC systems should be used. <br />- The anode should be provided with a water- <br />proof safety control (dead-man switch) operat- <br />ing through a low voltage secondary circuit. <br />- Only trained personel should perform electro- <br />fishing. <br />- This training should be provided by a course, <br />approved by the national fisheries authority. <br />- Permission for electrofishing should be perso- <br />nal on specific conditions. <br />- Equipment should be checked at least annually. <br />- A void fishing in rainy weather. <br />- For both safety and efficiency, a fishing team of <br />two persons is the minimum requirement. <br />- Disinfection of equipment should be made <br />adequate. <br /> <br />l <br />~ <br />f <br /> <br />r- <br />l <br /> <br />Acknowledgements <br /> <br />The study group has held tree meetings, and travel <br />and living expenses were provided by NOS-N <br />(Joint Committee of the Nordic Natural Science <br />Research Councils) as well as the respective <br />institutions of individual members. The participa- <br />tion of T. Bohlin was made possible by grants <br />from the Swedish Environmental Protection <br />Board, project No. 53130126-6 and 5313013-4. <br />R. Lynn McComas is thanked for linguistic and <br />editorial advice and I. Bremseth is thanked for <br />typewriting of several versions of the manuscript. <br /> <br />, <br />i" <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />I <br />I" <br />