My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7116 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7116 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:26:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7116
Author
Baxter, G. and J. Simon
Title
Editor
USFW Year
Series
USFW - Doc Type
1970
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Electrofishing in lakes <br /> <br />In open water areas of depths greater than the <br />attraction radius (appr. 1 m) electro fishing is <br />generally unsuccessful irrespective of the abun- <br />dance of fish. This is probably due to flight <br />reactions. Electrofishing is ineffective when the <br />transparency of the water is less than the attrac- <br />tion radius, and is almost impossible when the <br />transparency is less than the immobilisation <br />radius (app. 0.3-0.5 m). <br />In shallow water and/or in vegetated areas <br />electrofishing is possible and might, depending on <br />fish species and habitat, be very efficient. In suit- <br />able cover from vegetation or bottom substrates <br />most fish remain immobile even when boats <br />carrying noisy and vibrating equipment are close. <br />Fish generally do not show flight reactions until in <br />contact with the repelling zone of the anodic field. <br />Electrofishing in lakes is also useful for popula- <br />tion estimates by mark-recapture methods. To <br />reduce the inevitable effects of selectivity (with <br />respect to habitat and fish size), recapture should <br />be performed by other methods (e.g. gill nets, fyke <br />nets or by trawling). It is advisable to check <br />whether more or less closed subpopulations exist <br />in e.g. litoral and pelagic areas. When calculating <br />the population size, different size classes should <br />be treated separately. By comparing the catch and <br />the abundance of fish in different size classes the <br />selectivity of the fishing method can be estimated. <br />The abundance of fish in size classes with few or <br />no recaptures can then be estimated by inter- <br />polation of the selctivity (catch per effort/popula- <br />tion size) of adjacent size classes. <br />For some species and in some habitats the <br />catchability is high and the removal method can <br />be applied for population estimates. It is often <br />useful to subdivide the litoral zone with respect to <br />habitat (e.g. sand, gravel, stones, submerged vege- <br />tation, emerged vegetation). In small lakes <br />( < 20 ha) the totallitoral zone can often be fished <br />in one day. In larger lakes the litoral zone should <br />be thorougly subdivided into different relevant <br />habitats to facilitate subsampling. Movements of <br />fish between habitats is often neglible during day- <br />time. <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />All species occurring in the litoral zone can be <br />caught by electrofishing. Bottom dwelling species <br />like cottids, ruffe, Acerina cernua, gudgeon, Gobio <br />gobio, and crayfishes are generally vulnerable to <br />electrofishing. This is also true for species like <br />perch, Percafluviatilis, and for some cyprinids like <br />e.g. Phoxinus phoxinus and rudd, Scardinius <br />erythrophthalmus. Pike, Esox lucius, and large <br />cyprinids like tench, Tinca tinca and crucian carp, <br />Carassius carassius can be found litorally during <br />all seasons, but especially larger individuals are <br />most easily caught during spawning. Pelagic <br />species like roach, Rutilus rutilus, and bream, <br />Abramis brama, can be caught in very high num- <br />bers during schooling in litoral areas in late <br />autumn and winter. <br />Litoral fishing in shallow water can be per- <br />formed by walking along the shore line. This <br />method is often the only one possible for central <br />and inner parts of vegetation. In most cases, <br />however, it is more efficient and less strenuous to <br />fish by boat. It is then also possible to use heavier <br />and more efficient equipment. <br />When using gasoline engines it is in most cases, <br />both for practical and security reasons, advisable <br />to place the engine in a small, separate boat tied <br />to a larger one. The latter is then used by the <br />working team and for the equipment necessary for <br />handling the fish. If the fish are to be marked, an <br />operational team should consist of three persons; <br />one managing the boat(s), one fishing and one <br />measuring and marking the fish. In this way the <br />fish can be measured and marked before the <br />effects of the electronarcosis have disappeared, <br />which faciliates handling. Most fish can then be <br />replaced in approximately the same habitat where <br />they were caught. In cases where the whole popu- <br />lation is simultaneously vulnerable to electrofish- <br />ing the mark-recapture method can be substituted <br />by multiple mark-recapture. The validity of the <br />assumption of random sampling on a day to day <br />basis inherent in this method must however be <br />proven. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.