My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9494
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9494
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:25:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9494
Author
Briggs, M. K.
Title
Editor
USFW Year
Series
USFW - Doc Type
1996
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />12 / Riparian Ecosystem Recovery <br /> <br />Healthy versus Degraded Ecological Condition <br /> <br />In conservation literature, the term ecological condition (or ecological health) <br />is often used, yet rarely defined. It is a nebulous term whose definition often <br />depends on management objectives. For example, an ecologist developing a <br />management plan to preserve spotted owl (Strix occidentalis) habitat in the <br />Pacific Northwest will have an entirely different set of criteria for determining <br />the ecological condition of a forest ecosystem than would a forester cruising <br />timber. <br />The term healthy as used here describes a riparian ecosystem with a high <br />diversity of native plant species, and one that has not experienced dramatic <br />changes in structure (e.g., age- or size-class, composition, diversity, biomass) <br />or functional elements (e.g., changes in erosion rates, flow regime, ground- <br />water, channel morphology, productivity) in comparison to its pre-Anglo-set- <br />tlement condition. A degraded or damaged ecosystem is defined by the reverse <br />of the above. <br />The word degrade is also used differently by the various science disciplines. <br />Ecologists often use degrade to describe a reduction in the ecological condition <br />of an ecosystem; hydrologists to describe adjustments in channel profile. Here, <br />degrade is used mainly to describe a decline in ecological condition. However, <br />in chapter 6, degrade is also used to describe channel conditions: the emphasis <br />in this chapter on hydrology and drainageway conditions made the overlap of <br />definitions unavoidable. <br /> <br />Recovery <br /> <br />Generally, there are three possible end points for efforts undertaken to im- <br />prove the condition of an ecosystem that is in less than pristine condition: res- <br />toration, rehabilitation, and replacement/reallocation (Bradshaw 1988; Aron- <br />son et al. 1993). Restoration is an attempt to create an ecosystem exactly like <br />the one that was present prior to disturbance. Rehabilitation creates an eco- <br />system that is similar (but not identical) to the ecosystem that was present prior <br />to the disturbance. Replacement or reallocation strategies generally do not <br />attempt to restore an ecosystem to its predisturbance condition but instead are <br />intended to replace the original ecosystem with a different one. The term <br />recovery is used when the objective is unclear: recovery may be used to refer to <br />any type of project (restoration, rehabilitation, or replacement) that is under- <br />taken to improve the condition of degraded riparian ecosystems. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.