Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,~:Ji (~ <br /> <br />),17 . .~ J-{aAlti:: <br />~ <br /> <br />Physiological Effects of Electrofishing on <br />Largemouth Bass <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />Thomas A. Burns <br /> <br />Northwestern State University, Department of Biological Sciences <br />Natchitoches, Louisiana 71457 <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />Kenneth Lantz <br /> <br />Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries <br />P.o. Box 444, Natchitoches, Louisiana 71457 <br /> <br />ABSTRACT: Blood and tissue samples of adult largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) were taken from <br />control fish and from fish that were electroshocked and allowed recovery times of 0, 1,3, 5.5, and 19 h. <br />Shocking had no significant effect tp > 0.05) on hemoglobin, hematocrit, plasma protein. or percentage <br />water content oftissue. No sexual differences in these factors were noted. Blood lactate increased signifi- <br />cantly (P < 0.01) 1 h after electroshocking, returned to pre-shocked levels within a 3-h period, and then <br />continued to decline. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />The objectives of this study were to establish certain <br />blood and tissue values for largemouth bass (Microp- <br />terus salmoides), to determine whether electroshock had <br />a significant effect on these values, and to ascertain the <br />period of time necessary for recovery to pre-shocked <br />conditions. <br /> <br />Materials and Methods <br /> <br />In February 1977 we obtained 100 largemouth bass <br />ranging from 30 to 46 em in total length from the Bass <br />Anglers Sportsman's Society fishing tournament held at <br />Toledo Bend Reservoir, Louisiana. The fish were trans- <br />ported in aerated tanks to the National Fish Hatchery at <br />Natchitoches, Louisiana, and placed in a 0.2-ha pond <br />containing forage fish. No mortality occurred either dur- <br />ing transport or while the fish were held in the pond. <br />Fish were allowed to remain in the pond 1 week before <br />being seined and transferred a short distance to a build- <br />ing equipped with aerated cement holding tanks (about <br />0,8 x 0.8 x 2.7 m). Fish were held in these tanks at 160C <br />for 3 days without food before treatment. <br />A Smith-Root Type VI Electrofisher was used to shock <br />the fish with 400 V at 5 A pulsating DC for 13 s. At the <br />time of sampling a single fish was netted and removed <br />from the holding tank, stunned with a blow to the head, <br />and 3-4 ml of blood collected from a severed caudal <br />peduncle in a pre-dried test tube containing ammonium <br />heparin. Immediately after sampling, 0.5 ml was with- <br />drawn from the tube and transferred to a tube contain- <br /> <br />148 <br /> <br />ing 1.0 ml of cold 30% perchloric acid for determination <br />of plasma lactate. <br />Both blood samples were then placed on ice for 2 h <br />before analysis. The fish was then measured and <br />weighed, whole gonad samples were taken, and a piece <br />of muscle was removed from the lateral region of the <br />caudal peduncle, wrapped in foil, and stored frozen. <br />Hemoglobin determinations were made by using the <br />cyanmethemoglobin technique (Medi Chem Inc., Santa <br />Monica, California). Hematocrit measurements were <br />made by the microhematocrit method. After sampling <br />for hemoglobin and hematocrit, plasma was obtained by <br />centrifugation. Plasma proteins were determined by the <br />Lowrey technique (Sterling 1966). We determined <br />plasma lactate in the deproteinized sample, using an <br />enzyme kit (Boehringer Mannehim Co., Dallas, Texas). <br />The frozen muscle tissue was thawed and weighed on <br />an electronic balance and dried in a vacuum desiccator <br />until a constant weight was reached. The difference <br />between the initial weight and the dried weight was <br />used to calculate the percent tissue water. <br />When enough females and males had been sampled in <br />a particular treatment group, a Student's t-distribution <br />was used to test for siginficant differences between <br />sexes. If no significant difference (p ~ 0.05) was present, <br />data from males and females were combined for that <br />treatment group and compared with other treatment <br />groups by analysis of variance. If a significant difference <br />was observed, a Newman-Keuls test was used for dif- <br />ferentiation (Zar 1974). <br /> <br />THE PROGRESSIVE FISH-CULTURIST <br />