<br />.0
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />!
<br />J
<br />,
<br />I
<br />j
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />:
<br />
<br />It is interesting to note from Table 4 and Fig. 4 that,
<br />although the mean lJpetcular recovery time is somewhat
<br />shorter at 200 Hz than at SO Hz, this is not the case for
<br />narcosis times, where there was no sianJt1c:ant difference
<br />between the duration of narcosis at SO Hz and at 200 Hz.
<br />In contrast, while mean opercular recovery time at 100
<br />Hz did not differ significantly from the time at the other
<br />frequencies, the mean narcosis time at this frequency
<br />was significantly longer (P = 0,02) than at either SO Hz
<br />or 200 Hz. At 4,0 s cm-I the narcosis coefficient for 100
<br />Hz was also somewhat higher than for either of the other
<br />two frequencies.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />DISCUSSION
<br />
<br />In the past no clear distinction was 'made between
<br />narcosis induced br an electric current and paralysis
<br />caused by an electric current. In the case of paralysis a
<br />fish will swim away as Soon as the current is SWItched
<br />off. Where true narcosis is induced the fish will remain
<br />immobilized and relaxed for a period after the current is
<br />disconnected. In the present series true narcosis was
<br />always indUCed-by all the electrical configurations used,
<br />the fish remaining limp and unresllOnsive for varying
<br />periods after the current had been SWItched off.
<br />
<br />The results show that a half-wave rectified current will
<br />induce narcosis in the freshwater bream O. mossambicus
<br />and that a potential of 200 Vp is adequate to produce a
<br />sustained narcosis for 140 s. This compares favourable
<br />with the 156,8 s produced by a 60 Vrms, SO Hz, sine
<br />wave current (Barham et ai., 1988). Although a fre-
<br />quency of 100 Hz produced the longest narcosis times,
<br />the results achieved at 50 Hz are adequate and more
<br />practical in terms of unit design.
<br />
<br />The effecrof water temperature on narcosis times is in
<br />agreement with that. obtained for alternating current
<br />(Barham et ai., 1988) and may perhaps be due to tempe-
<br />rature induced changes in the cell membranes.
<br />
<br />The decrease in mean narcosis time after 60 s of cur-
<br />rent application is in general agreement with the results
<br />observed by Barham et ai., (1988) for alternating cur-
<br />rent. The reason for this phenomenon is not clear. Fur-
<br />ther investigation into this aspect will no doubt prove
<br />fruitful.
<br />
<br />This series, consisting of three parts studying the nar-
<br />cotic effects of electro-anaesthesia, has shown that fish
<br />length. is an ~portant consideration in detennining the
<br />narcotic potenbal of an electrical CUJ1'ent in the tilapiine
<br />fish O. mossambicus.
<br />
<br />The narcotic coefficient derived from the ratio of nar-
<br />cosis time to fish length (Barham et ai., 1987b) can be a
<br />useful tool in predicting the duration of narcosis for a
<br />given size of fish. Further refinement of this formula
<br />
<br />1
<br />,
<br />1
<br />i
<br />~~
<br />.1
<br />
<br />W, T. 8ARHAM, H. J. SCHOONBBE It. J. O. J. VISSBR
<br />
<br />involving a biological constant should make these pre_
<br />dictions more accurate. "~
<br />Variations in o~lar times and recovery times for
<br />both alternating and rectified currents would not nor-
<br />mally be major considerations in evaluating narcotic
<br />potentials. The actual period of narcosis must be the
<br />major criterion ,when evaluating the narcotic effects of an
<br />electric current.
<br />In contrast to chemical anaesthesia using benzocaine
<br />hydrochloride, where recovery from aneasthesia ap~
<br />traumatic, with the fish undergoing periods of VIolent
<br />swimming activities (personal observation), recovery
<br />from both forms of electronarcosis studied appears
<br />uneventful.
<br />This series of investigations has clearly shown that
<br />both alternating and rectified current electronarcosis pr0-
<br />duced adequate periods of anaesthesia in O. mossam-
<br />bicus for most routine laboratory procedures. AlthouJili
<br />an elaborate alternating current umt was employed in the
<br />study, a 60 Vrms, 50 Hz or similar current can usually be
<br />be obtained in most laboratories, using the main supply
<br />and a suitable transformer. It must be emphasized in the
<br />interests of operator safety that electronarcosis units, in /
<br />~ instances, must be isolated from the main supply.
<br />'this configuration should be within the means of most
<br />laboratories. In contrast, a rectified current electro-
<br />narcosis unit requires a more elaborate system.
<br />Thus, based on a consideration of the narcotic effects
<br />obtained and with due consideration to the circuit practi-
<br />calities, alternating current electronarcosis at 60 Vrms,
<br />50 Hz, appears to be the electronarcosis procedure of
<br />choice for O. mossambicus.
<br />
<br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
<br />The financial assistance of the University of Zululand
<br />and the Rand Afrikaans University is gratefully acknowl-
<br />1 edged.
<br />REFERENCES
<br />BARHAM. W. T., ScHooNBEE. H. 1. & VISSER, 1. G. J., 1987a. The
<br />design and development of an alternating current electronarcosis unit
<br />/ for use with freshwater fish. University of Zululand Publications.
<br />Series B. 20 pp.
<br />BARHAM, W. T., SCHooNBEE, H. J. & VISSER, J. G. 1., 1987b. The
<br />use of electronarcosis as anaesthetic in the cichlid Oreochromis mos-
<br />sambicus (Peters). I. General experimental procedures and the role
<br />of fish length on the narcotizing effects of electric currents.
<br />Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 54, 6l7~22.
<br />BARHAM. W. T., SorooNBEE. H.l. & VISSER, 1. G.l., 1988. The use
<br />of electronarcosis as aneasthetic in the cichlid Oreochromis mossam-
<br />bicus (Peters). II..The effects of changing fhysical and electrical
<br />parameters on the narcotizing ability 0 alternating current.
<br />Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 55, 205-215.
<br />MOORE. W. H., 1968. A light-weight pulsedd.c. fish shocker. Journal
<br />of Applied Ecology,S, 205-208.
<br />
<br />71
<br />
<br />.-.
<br />,'1
<br />
|