<br />
<br />strong one, when muscle spasms do not allow the fish to perform a compensating
<br />contraction on tbe opposite side. In the flounder, depending On the orientation
<br />in the field, protonus or opisthotonus is observed in the direction of the anode.
<br />Some authors call this flexure the "anode reaction."
<br />
<br />The ambiguous behavior of the intermediate group of fish can also be explained
<br />by their different mobility. T!lUs in the black Sea there are 2 ecological forms
<br />of SUrmullet, a resident and migratory form (Danilevskiy, 1939; Shul'man, 1972).
<br />The first lives off the Caucasian cOast (Batumi, Supsa, Novy Afon) and performs
<br />migrations to a depth of 10 - 20 m for spawning and foraging; .in autumn to a
<br />depth of 50- 80 m. The second form migrates in spring along the coast of Cau-
<br />casia and the Crimea .to the north, as far as the Sea of Azov where it spawns and
<br />feeds. In autumn reverse migrations OCcur along the Caucasian and Crimeancoast
<br />in a southerly direction. Naturally these 2 forms differs as regards activity
<br />and mobility.
<br />
<br />The Baltic Sea flounde~ has 2 similar ecological forms, the open sea and the
<br />coastal form (Betesheva and Kulikova,195.4; Zheltenkova, 1954). The coastal form
<br />spawns near the coast. The open sea form completes long spawning migrations and
<br />at great depths (Gotland trough, Gulf of Gdan' sk and Bornholm trough). The rate
<br />of growth of the coastal flounder is slower and in general it is smaller than the
<br />open sea flounder. Here, too. we see that mobility and activity differ indiffer-
<br />ent fol1llS. The grea.ter weever also manifests different activity in different
<br />seasons of the year. In summer it is frequently caught near the surface, in
<br />winter it moves to greater depths and remains solitary (Krotov, 1949). In the
<br />same article Krotov points to the occurrence -- repeatedly observed by him __ of
<br />the "Black Sea turbot" in the pelagic zone. It "is not out of the question that
<br />in our investigations we were..dealinll' with 2 forms of fish of one species, and
<br />their ambiguous behavior may well be. connected with the presence of specimens of
<br />greater or lesser mobility and activity.
<br />
<br />The difference in the behavior of the fish with different activity can be con-
<br />nected w:ith the peculiarities of their. metabolism. Halsband (1959) showed in the
<br />case of the trout, Salmo trutta, amdthe carp, Cyp:rinus cappio, that active fish
<br />with a high metabolic.intensity.are more easily stimulated by an electric,current
<br />but that their resistance to narcosis is greater than that of fish with a lesser
<br />intensive metabolism. Halsband calls this phenomenon. the "narcosis band. ".
<br />
<br />If we conside,r the data in our Table from this point of view. we shall see
<br />that fisb with an anode reaction (the exception being the dab) have. the widest
<br />narcosis band, fish without an anode.reaction having a nariowerband (the beam
<br />and the sole being the exception). It would evidently .be more correct to call
<br />...~s "tetanus band" because, as we have seen. electronarcosis always appears
<br />during protracted action of the current below the tetanus threshold. Electronar~
<br />~sis always appears during descending flow, however. the point here is not the
<br />i1i.1:ection of the current, but the.strengtb of field intensity. At any field in-
<br />tensity below -the tetanus thresholdk.the fish will turn towards the anode, Ire,-
<br />quentIy going .rightiJpto.,the anode. and only afterwards it will enter a .~tate .of
<br />electronarcosis. But,i.f t.he strength ,of .thevoltage ,in a descending flow;i.s suf-
<br />ficient to immobilize ,the fish instantly. then a typical tetanus reaction. con-.
<br />vulsi17e contraction ofal).,the body muscles is observed whatever the direction of
<br />tbe flow. Scheminsky (1936) also drew attention to this difference between '
<br />electronarcosis and tetanus"
<br />
<br />
<br />ThetJpe of current applied.also greatly influences.the.nature.of.the response
<br />reaction of the .fish. Thus in Our experiments we did not. succeed in obtaining an
<br />anode reaction intbe.dab in.a field of, tension from a generator. of the SAM-300
<br />velding.tmit (this current has such a low pulsation that.it canbl;', considered,.,
<br />practically direct). while in a field of rectified current with _ as already
<br />-.utioned - a pulsation of 100 ceycles Per second, theano.de reaction is distinctly
<br />lIl8Difestedin the dab both in the horizontal and the, .vertical, fields. We have
<br />already reported .on the different physiological effect of these type" of current
<br />(Balayev. 1.967). __
<br />
<br />140
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />The dependence of the behavior of fish and the distinctness ?f the manifesta=
<br />tion of the anode reaction on the type of current used (alter~at1ng, direct, pul
<br />i ) i widely known. Th.is applies particularly to pulsat1ng current, where
<br />sat ng s f / ff time ratio form of
<br />the different parameters may vary widely: requency, on 0 h b ' fi h
<br />lsation ete However. in all cases it is possible to distinguis etw~en s
<br />~~th 'or withou~ anode reaction (Scheminsky, 1924; Scheminsky, F. and Fr. Schemin-
<br />sky, 1931; Halsband, 1959; Nusenbaum and Faleyeva, 1961; Danyulite, 1961. etc.).
<br />
<br />It h ldalso be noted that all the authors studied the anode reaction, aimed
<br />at sOlv~n~Uthe "mechanism of current action on fish." without explaining what the
<br />
<br />word "mechanism" is intended to imply.
<br />
<br />On the basis of data obtained by us and other authors, it can be stated that
<br />all species of fish distinguish the polarity of an electric current and prefer _
<br />e cathode In our opinion, this is the very first stage of mani
<br />~::t:~~:~ ~~ ~~e anode r~action and should be called the "mechanis~ of current
<br />action ". The.actual movement towards the anode or the absence of 1t :oeshnot d
<br />enter into the concept "mechanism of current action. n Movement towar s. t e ano e
<br />or concealment depends on the ecological behavioral stereotype of the f1sh, on
<br />
<br />its activity and mobility.
<br />
<br />d - t' . fish depends not so much
<br />Thus the presence or absence of an ano e rea~ 10n 1n. k (1957) _ as on
<br />On morphology as some authors believe - in part1cular Sp1ec er,
<br />
<br />their mobilit;.and on t~eecolo~iC:~v~~:~e~~~~e20:t~:::~iO~i) ~~: :~~~:;g~~~~~:g
<br />rence of the anode react10n can e d th node ob
<br />by the fish of the polarity of the current and the turning towar s. e adth -
<br />served in all the species investigated by us. and (2) the movem~n~ toware~uge~
<br />anode (anode reaction) or the absence oft~(concealment, searc or a r
<br />depending on the ecological stereotype of behavior and the activity of the fish
<br />
<br />at a given IDoment.
<br />
<br />CONCLUSIONS
<br />
<br />to their behavior in an electric field of tectified, current,
<br />groups: those. with an anode reaction (pelagic and some
<br />without (demersal and bottom fishes) and these in the
<br />
<br />1. According
<br />fish are divided into 3
<br />demersal fishes), those
<br />intermediate group.
<br />
<br />absence of the anode reaction depends on'the ecological
<br />2. The. presence or
<br />stereotype of behavior.
<br />
<br />3. Irrespective of the presence or.absence
<br />fish distinguish the anode from the cathode and
<br />descending flow.
<br />
<br />4 The anode reaction occurs in 2 stages:. (1) distinction by the fi~hOf
<br />the p~larity of the current; (2) IDovement towards t~e anode or absence 0 move-
<br />ment depending on the ecological stereotype of behav10r of the fish.
<br />
<br />of anode reaction all species of
<br />prefer the anode, i.e., the
<br />
<br />The of electronarcosis or tetanus depends not on the orienta-
<br />appearance
<br />the fish in sn electric field, but on field intensity.
<br />
<br />described by uS applies in the case of an electric
<br />
<br />Submitted. August 14, 1978
<br />
<br />141
<br />
|