My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9331
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9331
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9331
Author
Allred, T. M. and J. C. Schmidt
Title
Channel narrowing by vertical accretion along the Green River near Green River, Utah
USFW Year
1999
USFW - Doc Type
Geological Society of American Bulletin
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />section dat:a obtained from discharge measure- <br />ments made between 1932 and 1984. Bed and <br />bank topographic data were extracted from those <br />measurements made when discharge inundated <br />the right bank. We synthesized these data into a <br />time series of the change in elevation of the sur- <br />face of the deposit near the right bank for the pe- <br />riod between 1956 and 1993 (Fig. 14). We deter- <br />mined the duration of time when this surface was <br />inundated by combining the stage-discharge rela- <br />tion and tbe hydrologic record. Everitt (1968) <br />used a combination of stratigraphic and den- <br />drochronologic techniques to produce a similar <br />plot of floodplain accretion rates for the Little <br />Missouri River in North Dakota. He demon- <br />strated that vertical accretion occurred, but he <br />could not provide a temporally-detailed perspec- <br />tive because his techniques had limited temporal <br />resolution. <br />Our data suggest that a channel bar had mi- <br />grated into the cross section, or otherwise estab- <br />lished itself, by 1956, and that the surface of this <br />bar rapidly increased in elevation during a period <br />when the bar was continuously inundated. This <br />bar was exposed for the first time after recession <br />from the 1959 flood. Thereafter, the bar was sub- <br />ject to deposition during each flood large enough <br />to inundate the surface. The bar was inundated 5 <br />times between 1959 and 1966 and 9 times be- <br />tween 1966 and 1984, which was the last time <br />that deposition occurred at this location. <br />The elevation of the ground surface that would <br />have been exposed in the late 1960s and early <br />1970s is the same as the elevation of the organic <br />layers exposed in the excavation. These topo- <br />graphic data agree with the tree ring dates, be- <br />cause the lowest elevation root crowns exposed in <br />the trench are located at elevations equivalent to <br />the ground surface surveyed in June 1959. <br />Thus, sa1tcedar established itself on this de- <br />posit immediately after it was exposed following <br />recession of the 1959 flood. At the time of germi- <br />nation, the substrate was well-sorted fine and <br />very-fine sand. New root crowns were estab- <br />lished during the period when the bar was not in- <br />undated between 1965 and 1970, and during the <br />5 floods of the 1970s when inundation occurred <br />but when there was only minimal deposition. <br />We also determined if similar processes had <br />occurred before 1956 by developing a time series <br />of channel width at low discharge (Fig. 15). Sim- <br />ilar processes occurred in the past but did not nec- <br />essarily lead to channel narrowing. Between 1930 <br />and 1936, the width of the channel at low dis- <br />charge varied between 90 and 106 m. Each time <br />the low-discharge channel narrowed, it was sub- <br />sequently rewidened. Between 1936 and 1948, <br />the low-discharge channel varied between 96 and <br />103 m in width. We interpret this temporal pattem <br /> <br />1764 <br /> <br />ALLRED AND SCHMIDT <br /> <br />-t . <br /> <br />0.25 <br />A > 0.15 m OF SCOUR SINCE PREVIOUS MEASUREMENT <br /> <br />0.20 <br /> <br />0.15 <br /> <br />Cf) <br />LU <br />() <br />Z <br />LU <br />a: <br />a: <br />:J <br />() <br />() <br />o <br />u. <br />o <br />z <br />o <br />~ <br />a: <br />o <br />a.. <br />o <br />a: <br />a.. <br /> <br />0.10 <br /> <br />0.05 <br /> <br />0.00 <br /> <br />0.35 <br /> <br />_ Thalweg <br />c:::=J Mean bed <br /> <br /> <br />8 > 0.15 m OF FILL SINCE PREVIOUS MEASUREMENT <br />0.30 <br /> <br />0.25 <br /> <br />0.20 <br /> <br />0.15 <br />0.10 <br /> <br />_ Thalweg <br />c:::=J Mean bed <br /> <br />0.05 <br /> <br /> <br />0.00 <br /> <br />co I'-- LO C\I C\I C') <:t LO <0 <0 I'-- co m 0 0 .,.... C\I C') C') <:t ~ <br />C\I LO co <:t ..... co LO C\I m <0 C') 0 I'-- LO C\I m <0 C') 0 I'-- 0 <br /> ..... C\I C\I C') <:t <:t LO <0 I'-- I'-- co m m 0 ..... C\I C\I <br /> ..... ..... ..... ..... :2 <br /> DISCHARGE <br /> (m3/s) <br /> <br />Figure 6. Histograms of scour (A) and 6II (B) at the present cableway for both the thalweg and <br />the mean bed elevations. Note that for both scour and fill, the discharge causing the largest pro- <br />portion of bed adjustment is between 85 and 142 m3/s. <br /> <br />as reflecting the migration ofIow-elevation chan- <br />nel bars (Fig. 2) into and out of the cross section. <br />The width of the channel at low discharge de- <br />creased during those times when a bar migrated <br />into the reach along one of the channel banks, <br />and the channel was wider when those bars were <br />not present. The process of channel narrowing <br />that began in 1957 is apparent in the decrease in <br />channel width at low discharge. The magnitude <br />of this decrease in width is similar to that which <br />occurred in 1930 and 1931. However, narrowing <br />was reversed by spring floods of 1082 m3/s and <br />784 m3/s that occurred in 1932 and 1933, respec- <br />tively, and which eroded the low-elevation bar <br />that had been present. <br />In contrast, neither the low-discharge channel <br />nor the bankfull channel rewidened after 1959, <br />because this bar never migrated downstream be- <br /> <br />Geological Society of America Bulletin, December 1999 <br /> <br />yond the cross section. The conversion of this bar <br />to a vegetated floodplain began during 3 years of <br />low annual floods, between 1959 and 1961. The <br />flood of 1 %2 was 920 m3/s, and it did not erode <br />this bar. Instead, this flood caused additional ver- <br />tical accretion. The magnitude of the 1962 flood, <br />which did not scour the bar, was 15% less than the <br />magnitude of the 1932 flood, which did produce <br />scour, but we cannot resolve the relative roles of <br />river hydraulics and more abundant saltcedar in <br />preventing bar scour in the early 1 %Os. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Timing and Rates of Channel Change <br /> <br />Within the study area, the Green River was at its <br />widest prior to 1930. At the old cableway, the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.