Laserfiche WebLink
<br />section dat:a obtained from discharge measure- <br />ments made between 1932 and 1984. Bed and <br />bank topographic data were extracted from those <br />measurements made when discharge inundated <br />the right bank. We synthesized these data into a <br />time series of the change in elevation of the sur- <br />face of the deposit near the right bank for the pe- <br />riod between 1956 and 1993 (Fig. 14). We deter- <br />mined the duration of time when this surface was <br />inundated by combining the stage-discharge rela- <br />tion and tbe hydrologic record. Everitt (1968) <br />used a combination of stratigraphic and den- <br />drochronologic techniques to produce a similar <br />plot of floodplain accretion rates for the Little <br />Missouri River in North Dakota. He demon- <br />strated that vertical accretion occurred, but he <br />could not provide a temporally-detailed perspec- <br />tive because his techniques had limited temporal <br />resolution. <br />Our data suggest that a channel bar had mi- <br />grated into the cross section, or otherwise estab- <br />lished itself, by 1956, and that the surface of this <br />bar rapidly increased in elevation during a period <br />when the bar was continuously inundated. This <br />bar was exposed for the first time after recession <br />from the 1959 flood. Thereafter, the bar was sub- <br />ject to deposition during each flood large enough <br />to inundate the surface. The bar was inundated 5 <br />times between 1959 and 1966 and 9 times be- <br />tween 1966 and 1984, which was the last time <br />that deposition occurred at this location. <br />The elevation of the ground surface that would <br />have been exposed in the late 1960s and early <br />1970s is the same as the elevation of the organic <br />layers exposed in the excavation. These topo- <br />graphic data agree with the tree ring dates, be- <br />cause the lowest elevation root crowns exposed in <br />the trench are located at elevations equivalent to <br />the ground surface surveyed in June 1959. <br />Thus, sa1tcedar established itself on this de- <br />posit immediately after it was exposed following <br />recession of the 1959 flood. At the time of germi- <br />nation, the substrate was well-sorted fine and <br />very-fine sand. New root crowns were estab- <br />lished during the period when the bar was not in- <br />undated between 1965 and 1970, and during the <br />5 floods of the 1970s when inundation occurred <br />but when there was only minimal deposition. <br />We also determined if similar processes had <br />occurred before 1956 by developing a time series <br />of channel width at low discharge (Fig. 15). Sim- <br />ilar processes occurred in the past but did not nec- <br />essarily lead to channel narrowing. Between 1930 <br />and 1936, the width of the channel at low dis- <br />charge varied between 90 and 106 m. Each time <br />the low-discharge channel narrowed, it was sub- <br />sequently rewidened. Between 1936 and 1948, <br />the low-discharge channel varied between 96 and <br />103 m in width. We interpret this temporal pattem <br /> <br />1764 <br /> <br />ALLRED AND SCHMIDT <br /> <br />-t . <br /> <br />0.25 <br />A > 0.15 m OF SCOUR SINCE PREVIOUS MEASUREMENT <br /> <br />0.20 <br /> <br />0.15 <br /> <br />Cf) <br />LU <br />() <br />Z <br />LU <br />a: <br />a: <br />:J <br />() <br />() <br />o <br />u. <br />o <br />z <br />o <br />~ <br />a: <br />o <br />a.. <br />o <br />a: <br />a.. <br /> <br />0.10 <br /> <br />0.05 <br /> <br />0.00 <br /> <br />0.35 <br /> <br />_ Thalweg <br />c:::=J Mean bed <br /> <br /> <br />8 > 0.15 m OF FILL SINCE PREVIOUS MEASUREMENT <br />0.30 <br /> <br />0.25 <br /> <br />0.20 <br /> <br />0.15 <br />0.10 <br /> <br />_ Thalweg <br />c:::=J Mean bed <br /> <br />0.05 <br /> <br /> <br />0.00 <br /> <br />co I'-- LO C\I C\I C') <:t LO <0 <0 I'-- co m 0 0 .,.... C\I C') C') <:t ~ <br />C\I LO co <:t ..... co LO C\I m <0 C') 0 I'-- LO C\I m <0 C') 0 I'-- 0 <br /> ..... C\I C\I C') <:t <:t LO <0 I'-- I'-- co m m 0 ..... C\I C\I <br /> ..... ..... ..... ..... :2 <br /> DISCHARGE <br /> (m3/s) <br /> <br />Figure 6. Histograms of scour (A) and 6II (B) at the present cableway for both the thalweg and <br />the mean bed elevations. Note that for both scour and fill, the discharge causing the largest pro- <br />portion of bed adjustment is between 85 and 142 m3/s. <br /> <br />as reflecting the migration ofIow-elevation chan- <br />nel bars (Fig. 2) into and out of the cross section. <br />The width of the channel at low discharge de- <br />creased during those times when a bar migrated <br />into the reach along one of the channel banks, <br />and the channel was wider when those bars were <br />not present. The process of channel narrowing <br />that began in 1957 is apparent in the decrease in <br />channel width at low discharge. The magnitude <br />of this decrease in width is similar to that which <br />occurred in 1930 and 1931. However, narrowing <br />was reversed by spring floods of 1082 m3/s and <br />784 m3/s that occurred in 1932 and 1933, respec- <br />tively, and which eroded the low-elevation bar <br />that had been present. <br />In contrast, neither the low-discharge channel <br />nor the bankfull channel rewidened after 1959, <br />because this bar never migrated downstream be- <br /> <br />Geological Society of America Bulletin, December 1999 <br /> <br />yond the cross section. The conversion of this bar <br />to a vegetated floodplain began during 3 years of <br />low annual floods, between 1959 and 1961. The <br />flood of 1 %2 was 920 m3/s, and it did not erode <br />this bar. Instead, this flood caused additional ver- <br />tical accretion. The magnitude of the 1962 flood, <br />which did not scour the bar, was 15% less than the <br />magnitude of the 1932 flood, which did produce <br />scour, but we cannot resolve the relative roles of <br />river hydraulics and more abundant saltcedar in <br />preventing bar scour in the early 1 %Os. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Timing and Rates of Channel Change <br /> <br />Within the study area, the Green River was at its <br />widest prior to 1930. At the old cableway, the <br />