Laserfiche WebLink
<br />lished (Fig. 10). The magnitude of narrowing, <br />which ceased by about 1938, was approximately <br />5 m. Channel width at the cableway was stable <br />between 1939 and 1957, but the channel nar- <br />rowed another 5 m between 1957 and 1962. Nar- <br />rowing of an additional 5 m occurred between <br />1%3 and 1993. <br />These conclusions are based on analysis of 36 <br />measurements made at discharges between 566 <br />and 623 m3/s. The periods of narrowing and sta- <br />bility were identified by visual inspection of the <br />data. MemJ channel widths for the three time pe- <br />riods were significantly different at the a = 0.15 <br />level (P <0.01) using an analysis of the covariant <br />structure of the data. Channel-width differences <br />are not an artifact of bias associated with the <br />magnitude of discharge at the time of each mea- <br />surement, because the range of discharge values <br />for each time interval are statistically equal. <br /> <br />. Changes in Hydraulic Geometry at <br />the Present Cableway <br /> <br />We analyzed changes in hydraulic geometry at <br />the present cableway in order to evaluate how the <br />entire shape of the channel has changed. We used <br />the 2600 measurements to compute these rela- <br />tionships for the same time periods we identified <br />above (Table 3). Hydraulic geometry relation- <br />ships fully describe the average channel geome- <br />try during a period of time, because each rela- <br />tionship describes channel shape and mean <br />section velocity over the full range of measured <br />discharges. <br />Between 1930 and 1938, there was a greater <br />difference between the width of the channel at <br />low and high discharge than in the two subsequent <br />periods (Fig. 11). We infer that base flow must <br />have been typically confmed within emergent <br />channel bars. The width of the channel at low dis- <br />charge between 1939 and 1957 was greater than <br />between 1930 and 1938, but the rate of change in <br />width with increasing discharge was lower than in <br />the previous period. Between 1963 and 1993, the <br />channel was 5 to 7% narrower than it had been in <br />the immediately preceding period. There are no <br />statistically significant differences in the hydraulic <br />geometry relations for the mean depth or mean <br />velocity for the three periods. <br /> <br />Changes Elsewhere in the Study Area <br /> <br />The magnitude and style of channel narrowing <br />in the 26.4-km reach where aerial photographs <br />were analyzed are consistent with the magnitude <br />and style of changes measured at the old and <br />present cableways (Fig. 10). Total active-channel <br />area through the study reach decreased by ap- <br />proximately 18% between 1938 and 1993, from <br /> <br />i762 <br /> <br />ALLRED AND SCHMIDT <br /> <br />.'~ <br /> <br />, ~. <br /> <br />TABLE 2. CHANGES IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY FLOOD FREQUENCY <br />OFTHE GREEN RIVER NEAR GREEN RIVER, UTAH <br /> <br />Time period Mean annual Recurrence intervalt <br />flow 1.25 yr 2 yr 5 yr <br />(m3 S-I) (m3 S-l) (m3 S-I) (m3 S-I) <br /> <br />1895-1929' 217 766 1062 1451 <br />1930-1957 156 544 740 969 <br />1963-1996 160 395 586 849 <br /> <br />'No data for 1900-1904 and 1906. <br />tAli recurrence intervals are calculated using the Log Pearson Type III method. <br /> <br />10 yr <br />(m3s-1) <br />1699 <br />1100 <br />1020 <br /> <br /> <br />4.20 x loti to 3.46 X 106 m2 (Table 4). This corre- <br />sponds to a reduction in average channel width of <br />28 m, from 159 m to 131 m, which is slightly <br />greater than the magnitude of narrowing mea- <br />sured at the present cableway. Although the tem- <br />poral resolution of these changes is poor because <br />of the lengthy intervals between some of the <br />photo series, the temporal pattern of these <br />changes is similar to those determined from the <br />analysis of changes at the present cableway. <br />Thus, it is reasonable to infer that the timing of <br />channel change throughout the study reach has <br />been similar to the timing determined at the pres- <br />ent cableway. <br />Within the study reach, channel narrowing <br />was caused by inset floodplain deposits similar <br />to the deposit on the right bank at the present ca- <br />bleway (Fig. 9). These inset deposits are ubiqui- <br /> <br />2500000 <br /> <br />2000000 <br /> <br />w <br />(!) <br />II: <br />~<- <br />U Ul <br />CIl E <br />Ci e <br />I- g> <br />Z Cl <br />W Q) <br />::iE-S <br />Ci <br />w <br />CIl <br /> <br />1500000 <br /> <br />1000000 <br />166 <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />500000 <br /> <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />tous throughout the reach; they occur in both <br />straight and curving sections and on both the in- <br />side and outside of channel bends. <br />The magnitude of channel narrowing in the <br />entire study reach exceeds that measured at the <br />gage; largely because the study reach originally <br />included numerous channel islands (Fig. 12). <br />Many of these islands are now attached to the <br />banks at most discharges, and the secondary <br />channels that once surrounded these islands have <br />become constricted andlor completely filled <br />with sediment. The surface area of secondary <br />channels decreased by over 50% between 1938 <br />and 1993 (Table 4). These changes represent an <br />overall simplification in channel form. Van <br />Steeter and Pitlick (1998) identified similar re- <br />ductions in a secondary channel area of the Col- <br />orado River near Grand Junction, Colorado. <br /> <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />1500 <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br />DISCHARGE <br />(m3/s) <br /> <br />Figure 4. Effective discharge curves for three time periods: 1894-1929 (thin line), 1930-1957 <br />(dotted line), and 1%3-1993 (thick line). Note that the largest reduction in effective discharge was <br />the result of natural cUmate change, and a smaller reduction occurred foUowing dam closure. <br /> <br />Geological Society of America Bulletin, December 1999 <br />