Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ,.' <br /> TABLE 5. PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VERTICALLY ACCRETED DEPOSIT ON THE RIGHT BANK .... <br /> AT THE PRESENTCABLEWAY <br />Elevation Sieve analysis Organic carbon Visual accumulation tube analysis Comments <br />(m) Sand" Siltt ClayS (%) Percent ot sample with fall diameter finer than indicated size <br /> (%) (%) (%) (mm) <br /> 0.175 0.125 0.088 0.0625 <br />4.05 64 28 8 99 96 83 52 <br />3.90 77 16 7 100 93 71 35 <br />3.80 24 61 16 100 98 93 82 <br />3.70 49 48 3 0.31 100 99 92 70 <br />3.49 36 49 15 100 97 88 71 <br />3.42 22 65 13 100 100 98 89 <br />3.34 32 57 12 0.87 100 99 97 84 <br />3.24 16 <-84 -> 3.83 100 97 92 86 Upper organic layer <br />3.20 20 62 18 100 99 96 87 <br />3.16 39 45 17 1.26 100 96 85 68 Lower organic layer <br />3.09 70 22 8 0.17 100 94 73 40 <br />2.94 58 29 13 100 97 82 55 <br />2.78 49 37 14 0.51 100 97 84 61 <br />2.63 48 40 12 100 99 88 65 <br />2.48 1 79 20 <- Insufficient quantity of sand for analysis -> <br />2.33 47 44 9 100 99 93 73 <br />"Greater than 0.0625 mm. <br />tBetween 0.0625 mm and 0.002 mm. <br />~Less than 0.002 mm. <br /> <br /> 1400 C <br />W 1200 <br />(!) <br />a:~ 1000 <br /><c.!!1 800 ~ <br />J:~ ; <br />uS 600 <br />en Position of saltcedar <br />5 400 / in the deposit <br /> 200 <br /> 0 <br /> 5 <br /> B 1200 <br /> 4 900 <br />Z 700 <br />0 <br />I- 3 500 Cil <br /><( ;:;-- <br />> S <br />W 250 <br />..J <br />w- 2 <br />>-s <br />a: 100 <br /><( <br />a: 50 <br />I- 1 <br />m <br />a: <br /><( <br /> 0 <br /> -1 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 45 35 25 <br /> YEAR POSITION ON CABLEWAY <br /> Saltcedar colonize bar (m) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 14. Detailed history of the formation of an inset floodplain deposit. (A) Vertical accretion of the inset floodplain over time. Blue shaded <br />regions indicate periods of inundation. Data points marked with triangles are from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) discharge measurement data; <br />point marked with a star was estimated from the stratigraphy ofthe excavated area (shown by dashed box). (B) Plots of the nearly horizontal bar <br />surface as it accreted vertically, taken from USGS discharge measurement data. Also shown is the approximate vertical position of the saItcedar <br />that were excavated from the deposit. (C) Plot of discharge for the same time period shown in A. Note that flood magnitudes that inundated the <br />bar in 1960 are of insufficient stage to inundate the bar in 1976. Also note the incremental nature of the bar building process, the rapid rate of ac- <br />cretion, and that measurable accretion did not occur during all periods of inundation. <br /> <br />1770 <br /> <br />Geological Society of America Bulletin, December 1999 <br />