My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9331
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9331
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9331
Author
Allred, T. M. and J. C. Schmidt
Title
Channel narrowing by vertical accretion along the Green River near Green River, Utah
USFW Year
1999
USFW - Doc Type
Geological Society of American Bulletin
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> ,.' <br /> TABLE 5. PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VERTICALLY ACCRETED DEPOSIT ON THE RIGHT BANK .... <br /> AT THE PRESENTCABLEWAY <br />Elevation Sieve analysis Organic carbon Visual accumulation tube analysis Comments <br />(m) Sand" Siltt ClayS (%) Percent ot sample with fall diameter finer than indicated size <br /> (%) (%) (%) (mm) <br /> 0.175 0.125 0.088 0.0625 <br />4.05 64 28 8 99 96 83 52 <br />3.90 77 16 7 100 93 71 35 <br />3.80 24 61 16 100 98 93 82 <br />3.70 49 48 3 0.31 100 99 92 70 <br />3.49 36 49 15 100 97 88 71 <br />3.42 22 65 13 100 100 98 89 <br />3.34 32 57 12 0.87 100 99 97 84 <br />3.24 16 <-84 -> 3.83 100 97 92 86 Upper organic layer <br />3.20 20 62 18 100 99 96 87 <br />3.16 39 45 17 1.26 100 96 85 68 Lower organic layer <br />3.09 70 22 8 0.17 100 94 73 40 <br />2.94 58 29 13 100 97 82 55 <br />2.78 49 37 14 0.51 100 97 84 61 <br />2.63 48 40 12 100 99 88 65 <br />2.48 1 79 20 <- Insufficient quantity of sand for analysis -> <br />2.33 47 44 9 100 99 93 73 <br />"Greater than 0.0625 mm. <br />tBetween 0.0625 mm and 0.002 mm. <br />~Less than 0.002 mm. <br /> <br /> 1400 C <br />W 1200 <br />(!) <br />a:~ 1000 <br /><c.!!1 800 ~ <br />J:~ ; <br />uS 600 <br />en Position of saltcedar <br />5 400 / in the deposit <br /> 200 <br /> 0 <br /> 5 <br /> B 1200 <br /> 4 900 <br />Z 700 <br />0 <br />I- 3 500 Cil <br /><( ;:;-- <br />> S <br />W 250 <br />..J <br />w- 2 <br />>-s <br />a: 100 <br /><( <br />a: 50 <br />I- 1 <br />m <br />a: <br /><( <br /> 0 <br /> -1 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 45 35 25 <br /> YEAR POSITION ON CABLEWAY <br /> Saltcedar colonize bar (m) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 14. Detailed history of the formation of an inset floodplain deposit. (A) Vertical accretion of the inset floodplain over time. Blue shaded <br />regions indicate periods of inundation. Data points marked with triangles are from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) discharge measurement data; <br />point marked with a star was estimated from the stratigraphy ofthe excavated area (shown by dashed box). (B) Plots of the nearly horizontal bar <br />surface as it accreted vertically, taken from USGS discharge measurement data. Also shown is the approximate vertical position of the saItcedar <br />that were excavated from the deposit. (C) Plot of discharge for the same time period shown in A. Note that flood magnitudes that inundated the <br />bar in 1960 are of insufficient stage to inundate the bar in 1976. Also note the incremental nature of the bar building process, the rapid rate of ac- <br />cretion, and that measurable accretion did not occur during all periods of inundation. <br /> <br />1770 <br /> <br />Geological Society of America Bulletin, December 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.