Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Figure 11. Hydraulic geometry <br />relations for the present cable- <br />way for three time periods. Dot. <br />ted lines show the rdation for the <br />first period of chani1e1 narrowing <br />between 1930 and 1938. Dashed <br />lines show the relation for the pe- <br />ri od when width was stable be- <br />tween 1939 and 1957. Solid lines <br />show the relation for the period <br />between 1963 and 1993 when <br />tlIere was a slow rate of channel <br />narrowing. Note the change in <br />bank angle implied by the change <br />in slope of the width relation fol- <br />lowing 1938. Error envelopes for <br />width data rep~ent the 95 % <br />confidence limits. <br /> <br />substantial rewidening of th~ bankfull channel at <br />any time since 1911. The processes of floodplain <br />stripping and rewidening by floods, however, <br />cannot be discounted if the Green River were to <br />return to a hydrologic regime similar to the pe- <br />riod between 1895 and 1930. <br />The history of channel change and the calcu- <br />lated shifts in effective discharge demonstrate <br />that any correlation between effective discharge <br />and the discharge that inundates alluvial deposits <br />in vertically-accreting systems is fortuitous, since <br />the elevation of overbank deposits is continually <br />increasing over time. At the present cableway, the <br />discharge that inundates the 'banks has increased <br />during the past 30 years. However, the effective <br />discharge has not similarly responded. <br /> <br />Proposed Mechanism for btverse <br />Stratification of Floodplain Deposits <br /> <br />Severql researchers have noted the presence of <br />inversely-gr;ided river deposits (Rubin et aI., <br /> <br />~::: <br />~~ <br />~ :;::;.-" :::-- <br />~.~>,--- <br />~;~-:;-:--. <br />~9/ <br />WIDTH(m) -",,~~~;?,-;:,::.. <br /> <br />~~~9- <br />--~::;;.- ......-;-::;~ <br />~:;;-- ~5;.:.- <br />~"~- <br />4- Z <br /> <br />ALLRED AND SCHMIDT <br /> <br />120 <br /> <br />110 <br /> <br />'.. <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />80 <br />5 <br /> <br />MEAN DEPTH (m) <br /> <br />1 <br />0.5 <br /> <br />MEAN VELOCITY (m/$) <br /> <br />0.1 <br />10 <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />DISCHARGE <br />(m3ts) <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />1998; Iseya, 1989). Rubin et al. (1998) found in- <br />versely-graded fluvial deposits created by the <br />1996 experimental flow released from Glen <br />Canyon Dam. They concluded that fine sands <br />were selectively winnowed from the bed during <br />the flood, leaving behind higher concentrations <br />of medium and coarse sand that could still be sus- <br />pended. Iseya (1989) also identified inverse grad- <br />ing of overbank deposits, and proposed a mecha- <br />nism for their emplacement. She suggested that <br />silts and clays are deposited during the early <br />stages of flooding when flow over the floodplain <br />is shallow and velocities are low. As flood mag- <br />nitude increases, sand-sized particles can be sus- <br />pended in the channel but cannot be suspended <br />over the flood]:>Iain. Thus, these larger particles <br />fall from suspension onto the floodplain, leading <br />to inverse grading. <br />Our data describe another mechanism for the <br />disruption of th,e typical fining-upward se- <br />quences commonly found in fluvial deposits; <br />upward-coarsening may be an inevitable result <br /> <br />of vertical accretion. Rubin et al. (1998) and <br />Iseya (1989) described mechanisms whereby de- <br />posits coarsen during a single flood event. Green <br />River deposits cOarsen because floods of higher <br />magnitude are necessary to inundate a vertically- <br />aggrading floodplain. We distinguish 3 concep- <br />tually different zones in the inset floodplain de- <br />posit (Fig. 13). <br />Lower Zone-Low-Elevation Part of De- <br />posit. During the early formation of the flood- <br />plain, the elevation of the deposit is very low. <br />Bedload, composed of medium and coarse sand, <br />moves across the bar. Climbing bedforms accrete <br />vertically and form the lower part of what even- <br />tually becomes the floodplain. <br />Intennediate Zone-Mode~te Elevations. <br />As aggradation continues, floods of moderate <br />magnitude can overtop the surface. In these mod- <br />erate floods, flow depth l:ind velocity are suffi- <br />ciently low that only fine particles are suspended <br />near the surface, and these fine particles are trans- <br />ported onto the floodplain. Silts and clays are <br /> <br />TABLE 4. TWENTIETH-CENTURY CHANGES IN CHANNEL AREA FROM AERIAl- PHOTOGRAPHY <br /> <br />Active channel Mean channel Percent 011938 active Secon<:Iary Percent of 1938 <br />area width channel area channel area $econdary channel area <br />Year (km2) (m) ('Yo) (km2) ('Yo) <br /> <br />1938 4.20 159 100 0.49 100 <br />1952 4.00 152 95 0.35 71 <br />1962 4.05 153 96 0.36 73 <br />1985 3.58 136 85 0.27 55 <br />1993 3.46 131 82 0.24 49 <br /> <br />1768 Geological Society of America Bulletin, December 1999 <br />