My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8021
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8021
Author
Bestgen, K. R. and J. M. Bundy
Title
Environmental Factors Affect Daily Increment Deposition and Otolith Growth in Young Colorado Squawfish
USFW Year
1998
USFW - Doc Type
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OTOLITH MICROSTRUCTURE OF COLORADO SQUAWFISH <br /> <br />115 <br /> <br />Results of experiments 2 and 3 apparently con- <br />tradict one another because otolith growth rates <br />did not change during starvation in the former but <br />did in the latter. The smaller (mean TL, 8.2 mm) <br />and younger (6 d posthatch) fish in experiment 3 <br />were likely to show effects of longer starvation <br />periods sooner than the larger (11.1 mm) and older <br />(17 d) fish used in experiment 2 because the youn- <br />ger fish had smaller energy reserves. Otoliths of <br />larger and older Colorado squawfish larvae would <br />likely exhibit reduced growth if fish were starved <br />longer than 6 d. <br />Thorrold and Williams (1989) also suggested <br />that changes in food abundance may affect otolith <br />growth more quickly in smaller, younger larvae <br />than in larger and older juveniles, presumably be- <br />cause larvae deplete energy reserves more quickly. <br />In support of this, Maillet and Checkley (1990) <br />and ~Eckmann and Rey (1987) found that otolith <br />growth rates of small larvae less than 10 d old <br />were reduced almost immediately after starvation. <br />Reduced increment widths were not statistically <br />detectable in larger and older glass fish Ambassis <br />vachelli or chinook salmon for at least 2 weeks <br />after starvation (Molony and Choat 1990; Brad- <br />ford and Geen 1992). Thus, small-bodied life <br />stages or species that are more vulnerable to star- <br />vation (Miller et al. 1988) may display reduced <br />otolith growth more immediately than larger-bod- <br />ied life stages or species due to differences in en- <br />ergy or calcium reserves. <br />Laboratory conditions in experiment 4 simulat- <br />ed environmental changes experienced by wild <br />Colorado squawfish when larvae are transported <br />downstream of spawning areas in the relatively <br />cool, turbid, and food-poor main channel and then <br />move into relatively warm, low-velocity channel <br />margin habitats (backwaters) with higher food <br />abundance (Haines and Tyus 1990; Tyus and <br />Haines 1991). Increased widths of otolith daily <br />increments (result of increased otolith growth) in <br />wild fish may signal the arrival and feeding by <br />Colorado squawfish larvae in backwaters, in which <br />case, they may reveal the effects of different flows <br />on transport rates of larvae from spawning to nurs- <br />ery areas. Similarly, settlement marks in otolitlts <br />of some marine fishes record shifts from a pelagic <br />life style to a benthic one. (Victor 1991). <br />Age of Colorado squawfish larvae was deter- <br />mined by simply counting otolith daily increments. <br />Numbers and patterns of daily increments will be <br />useful for determining the relative importance of <br />cohorts in age-classes and the distributions of <br />hatching dates for populations. However, age de- <br /> <br />terminations made for Colorado squaw fish from <br />counting daily otolith increments should incor- <br />porate estimates of error, determined by prediction <br />intervals for size-classes, into analyses. Similarly, <br />growth rate estimates based on fish length at cap- <br />ture and age (e.g., growth/day) should incorporate <br />the uncertainty of age estimates into calculations <br />(Rice 1987). <br />Otolith growth rates in Colorado squawfish de- <br />pended on water temperature, somatic growth rate, <br />food availability, and perhaps many other envi- <br />ronmental factors. Ololith growth rates were af- <br />fected by age- and size-specific responses to star- <br />vation, and by the duration and delayed effects of <br />starvation. Complex patterns of otolith growth, <br />and the non synchrony of otolith and somatic <br />growth during periods of variable food abundance, <br />suggest that accurate back-calculation of daily <br />growth for individual fish larvae and the correla- <br />tion of growth rate changes with time-specific en- <br />vironmental events may be difficult. This is so <br />because most techniques for back-calculating <br />length require a proportional relationship of otolith <br />to somatic growth such that a severe reduction (or <br />increase) in growth would be recorded as corre- <br />spondingly reduced (or increased) otolith growth. <br />Although length back-calculation may yield useful <br />growth rate information for populations rather than <br />for individuals, the bias of these techniques should <br />be evaluated before they are used with Colorado <br />squawfish (Francis 1990; 1995). Delayed reduc- <br />tions of otolith growth after starvation periods <br />(e.g., experiment 3) reflected reduced somatic <br />growth in the history of a fish, so it may be possible <br />to calculate reductions in growth for periods of <br />time longer than a day from otolith growth pat- <br />terns. Changes in otolith microstructure of wild <br />fish that are induced by habitat shifts or changes <br />in food abundance or temperature may also yield <br />insights into processes that affect growth and sur- <br />vival of early life stages of Colorado squawfish <br />(Bestgen 1997). <br /> <br />Acknowledgments <br /> <br />Funding for this project was provided by the <br />U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Salt Lake City, Utah, <br />under cooperative agreement 8-FC-40-06460 with <br />the Larval Fish Laboratory (LFL) of Colorado <br />State University, and by the Recovery Implemen- <br />tation Program of the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />Project administration was facilitated by R. Wil- <br />liams, L. Crist, and R. Muth. Fish embryos and <br />larvae were provided by Dexter National Fish <br />Hatchery and Technology Center, U.S. Fish and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.