Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OTOLITH MICROSTRUCTURE OF COLORADO SQUAWFISH <br /> <br />115 <br /> <br />Results of experiments 2 and 3 apparently con- <br />tradict one another because otolith growth rates <br />did not change during starvation in the former but <br />did in the latter. The smaller (mean TL, 8.2 mm) <br />and younger (6 d posthatch) fish in experiment 3 <br />were likely to show effects of longer starvation <br />periods sooner than the larger (11.1 mm) and older <br />(17 d) fish used in experiment 2 because the youn- <br />ger fish had smaller energy reserves. Otoliths of <br />larger and older Colorado squawfish larvae would <br />likely exhibit reduced growth if fish were starved <br />longer than 6 d. <br />Thorrold and Williams (1989) also suggested <br />that changes in food abundance may affect otolith <br />growth more quickly in smaller, younger larvae <br />than in larger and older juveniles, presumably be- <br />cause larvae deplete energy reserves more quickly. <br />In support of this, Maillet and Checkley (1990) <br />and ~Eckmann and Rey (1987) found that otolith <br />growth rates of small larvae less than 10 d old <br />were reduced almost immediately after starvation. <br />Reduced increment widths were not statistically <br />detectable in larger and older glass fish Ambassis <br />vachelli or chinook salmon for at least 2 weeks <br />after starvation (Molony and Choat 1990; Brad- <br />ford and Geen 1992). Thus, small-bodied life <br />stages or species that are more vulnerable to star- <br />vation (Miller et al. 1988) may display reduced <br />otolith growth more immediately than larger-bod- <br />ied life stages or species due to differences in en- <br />ergy or calcium reserves. <br />Laboratory conditions in experiment 4 simulat- <br />ed environmental changes experienced by wild <br />Colorado squawfish when larvae are transported <br />downstream of spawning areas in the relatively <br />cool, turbid, and food-poor main channel and then <br />move into relatively warm, low-velocity channel <br />margin habitats (backwaters) with higher food <br />abundance (Haines and Tyus 1990; Tyus and <br />Haines 1991). Increased widths of otolith daily <br />increments (result of increased otolith growth) in <br />wild fish may signal the arrival and feeding by <br />Colorado squawfish larvae in backwaters, in which <br />case, they may reveal the effects of different flows <br />on transport rates of larvae from spawning to nurs- <br />ery areas. Similarly, settlement marks in otolitlts <br />of some marine fishes record shifts from a pelagic <br />life style to a benthic one. (Victor 1991). <br />Age of Colorado squawfish larvae was deter- <br />mined by simply counting otolith daily increments. <br />Numbers and patterns of daily increments will be <br />useful for determining the relative importance of <br />cohorts in age-classes and the distributions of <br />hatching dates for populations. However, age de- <br /> <br />terminations made for Colorado squaw fish from <br />counting daily otolith increments should incor- <br />porate estimates of error, determined by prediction <br />intervals for size-classes, into analyses. Similarly, <br />growth rate estimates based on fish length at cap- <br />ture and age (e.g., growth/day) should incorporate <br />the uncertainty of age estimates into calculations <br />(Rice 1987). <br />Otolith growth rates in Colorado squawfish de- <br />pended on water temperature, somatic growth rate, <br />food availability, and perhaps many other envi- <br />ronmental factors. Ololith growth rates were af- <br />fected by age- and size-specific responses to star- <br />vation, and by the duration and delayed effects of <br />starvation. Complex patterns of otolith growth, <br />and the non synchrony of otolith and somatic <br />growth during periods of variable food abundance, <br />suggest that accurate back-calculation of daily <br />growth for individual fish larvae and the correla- <br />tion of growth rate changes with time-specific en- <br />vironmental events may be difficult. This is so <br />because most techniques for back-calculating <br />length require a proportional relationship of otolith <br />to somatic growth such that a severe reduction (or <br />increase) in growth would be recorded as corre- <br />spondingly reduced (or increased) otolith growth. <br />Although length back-calculation may yield useful <br />growth rate information for populations rather than <br />for individuals, the bias of these techniques should <br />be evaluated before they are used with Colorado <br />squawfish (Francis 1990; 1995). Delayed reduc- <br />tions of otolith growth after starvation periods <br />(e.g., experiment 3) reflected reduced somatic <br />growth in the history of a fish, so it may be possible <br />to calculate reductions in growth for periods of <br />time longer than a day from otolith growth pat- <br />terns. Changes in otolith microstructure of wild <br />fish that are induced by habitat shifts or changes <br />in food abundance or temperature may also yield <br />insights into processes that affect growth and sur- <br />vival of early life stages of Colorado squawfish <br />(Bestgen 1997). <br /> <br />Acknowledgments <br /> <br />Funding for this project was provided by the <br />U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Salt Lake City, Utah, <br />under cooperative agreement 8-FC-40-06460 with <br />the Larval Fish Laboratory (LFL) of Colorado <br />State University, and by the Recovery Implemen- <br />tation Program of the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />Project administration was facilitated by R. Wil- <br />liams, L. Crist, and R. Muth. Fish embryos and <br />larvae were provided by Dexter National Fish <br />Hatchery and Technology Center, U.S. Fish and <br />