Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i~ <br />~?!I <br /> <br /> <br />258 <br /> 80 <br /> 10 <br />- <br />. <br />. <br />"ii <br />::I 60 <br />-,;) <br />~ <br />'a <br />.!: <br />10 <br />0- liO <br />i' <br />l:- <br />e <br />:3 40 <br />g <br />i. 10 <br />E <br />::I <br />. <br />C <br />0 to <br />co <br />c <br />. <br />Gl <br />~ <br />0 10 <br /> 0 <br /> <br />;r-. <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br />. -, <br />, <br /> <br />. & 20ec <br />.. 'S.C <br /> <br />. . 'O.C <br /> <br /> <br />o . cd. <br />OeveIopmenl.ll stages <br /> <br />Fig. I. Oxygen COftSUR\('lioR of eg. enlbryo lIftd larva sta&l-~ of <br />r.azorbaCk sucker. x"..udwn I~X(lllUS. at three t.k.-veIopmL'1Ital <br />temperatures (10. IS. and 20" C). Devetopmemal Slagcs corre- <br />spond to Mindi.\ey It. GUSlafson (1982) and are: a - moruW <br />bastula. b- pre.taiIbud. (- pre-hatch. d - post-hatch. c - swim- <br />up. and f _ yolk depIctioo. ()xyaen consumption valueS are the <br />means and c:orrnponding 95% confIdenCe interVals. <br /> <br /> <br />high as 20 C occurring in February ll.)l'\~. B;lsed <br />upon developmental rates at 100 C.larvae collected <br />in January 1982 probably were the result of spawn- <br />ing in early December or late November 1981. No- <br />vember through January arc the coldest seasonal <br />watcr temperature months in Lake Mohavc. <br />The highest density of larvae was found in the Six <br />Mile Coves area in February 1983 when 10 larvae <br />min-I were collected at a depth of 1.1 m. Larvae <br />were less abundant on that date in deeper water <br />over the spawning area. Water temperatures dur- <br />ing collecting were 12.O"C during the day and <br />10S'C at night. <br />Although larvae were abundant in the Six Milc <br />Coves area in February. no larvae were collected <br />from this site in March. Severe winds and heavy <br />wave action preceding the coUection dates disrupt- <br />ed and likely decimated redds in the spawnint. area. <br />Spawning in this area was abandoned for the re- <br />mainder of the year following the storm but contin. <br />ued in other areas of the reservoir that presumably <br />were more protected a~ evidenced by larvae col- <br />lected from Tequila Covc. <br />Total lengths of wild-caught larvae on different <br />sampling dates ranged from 10.4::t 0.5 to J 1.1 ::t <br />O.5mm (mean::t lsd). The largest was 12.6mm <br />and in the early mesotarval stages of development. <br />No larvae collected were past this stages of clevel- <br /> <br />T.bI~ 2. Hatching success of razorback sudtm as a function of water temperature. P~rc:..'1I' viable ....t"... of normal ,,'1I1hryus :m: <br />expressed as the mean:!: one 5tlIndard deviation. <br />Experiment Spawning Incubation Number of No. of ova per "" viahIe ....tch % viabk h:udl <br /> temperature temperature replicates replicate (mean) (range) <br />A 11.0 10 2 2.~ 57 .3 j: V. (5:!.2~.3) <br />8 12.8 10 1 626 21.9 na <br /> 12.8 15 1 SNO 32.2 na <br /> 12.8 20 I 601 33.6 na <br />C 11.0 8 4 SO 0.0 na <br /> 11.0 12 4 SO 36.0:t 10.M (2lI.u-44.0) <br /> 11.0 15 4 SO 39.5 :t 4.9 (3-U1-46.0) <br /> 11.0 20 4 50 3H.O j: 4.M (34.0-4'-11) <br />D 13.0 II 4 70 0.0 na <br /> 13.0 10 4 70 36.3 j: 7.3 (27.0-44.0) <br /> 13.0 15 4 70 64JI:t 5.U (59.0-71.0) <br /> 13.0 20 4 70 64.5 :t 3.R (6W-70.0) <br />na = not applicable. <br /> <br />I <br />! <br />~~. <br />, <br /> <br />