Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~U5 (q1J <br />/ <br />J-5'i' (j~K\ <br /> <br /> <br />Pergamon <br /> <br />~0770) , <br /> <br />Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol..B, No.6, pp. 93~939, 19'Jll <br />Copyright @ 1994 SETAC <br />Printed in the USA <br />0130-7268/94 $6.00 + .00 <br /> <br />0730-7268 (94)E0024-6 <br /> <br />ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE INHIBITION IN FEDERALLY ENDANGERED <br />COLORADO SQUAWFISH EXPOSED TO CARBARYL AND MALATHION <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />DANIEL W. BEYERS* and PETER ], SIKOSKI <br />Larval Fish Laboratory, Department of Fishery and Wildlife Biology, <br />Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />(Received 21 June 1993; Accepted 2 December 1993) <br /> <br />Abstrac~ - ~oxicity. of technical carbaryl and malathion to endangered Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) was estimated <br />by 24-h m VIVO bram acetylcholinesterase-inhibition tests. Effect concentrations were estimated by ANOVA and an alternative <br />procedure utilizing a linear-plateau regression model. NOECs were 29.3 ILg/L carbaryl and 3711Lg/L malathion. Threshold con- <br />centrations estimated by linear-plateau regression were 7.40 ILg/L carbaryl and 150 ILg/L malathion. NOECs showed that car- <br />baryl was approximately 13 times more toxic than malathion. Relative potency of the two toxicants was confirmed by linear-plateau <br />regression analysis: Threshold estimates showed that carbaryl was approximately 20 times more toxic than malathion. NOECs <br />for acetylcholinesterase inhibition were 15 times lower for carbaryl, and four times lower for malathion, than NOECs estimated <br />from growt~ and survival in 32-d early-life-stage tests. The difference between effect concentrations estimated by the two meth- <br />ods was attnbuted to development of tolerance in 32-d early-life-stage tests and greater sensitivity of biochemical processes com- <br />pared to whole-organism responses. <br /> <br />Keywords - Carbaryl <br /> <br />Threshold concentration <br /> <br />Malathion <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The insecticides carbaryl and malathion are used to con- <br />trol grasshopper infestations on rangeland and cropland <br />throughout the western United States. Both chemicals exert <br />their toxic effects by inhibiting the enzyme acetylcholinester- <br />ase (AChE), thereby causing disruption of the central ner- <br />vous system [IJ. Insecticides used to control grasshopper <br />infestations pose a hazard to fishes because deposition in <br />aquatic habitats may occur by accidental drift or runoff de- <br />spite no-spray buffer zones [2]. <br />Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) is the largest <br />minnow in North America and historically occurred through- <br />out the Colorado River Basin [3,4]. Colorado squawfish pop- <br />ulations have declined as a result of construction of reservoirs <br />and other management practices [5]. In response to the rapid <br />decline and threat of extinction, the Colorado squaw fish was <br />listed as a federally endangered species in 1967. Although <br />scarcity and federally endangered status have made study <br />of wild Colorado squawfish difficult, information on life <br />history and behavior has been collected [4]. During theJirst <br />several months of life (June-October), larvae of Colorado <br />squawfish occupy shallow, low-velocity, near-shore habitats. <br />Because these habitats have low rates of water exchange, pes- <br />ticides deposited in them may be present in sufficient con- <br />centration and duration for toxic effects to occur. Spatial and <br />temporal overlaps of grasshopper control programs and Col- <br />orado squawfish life history are such that potentially sensi- <br />tive life stages (<30 d old) are at risk of exposure. <br /> <br />*To whom correspondence may be addressed. <br />Contribution 68, Larval Fish Laboratory, Colorado State <br />University. <br /> <br />Dose-response model <br /> <br />End points <br /> <br />Toxicity of carbaryl and malathion to fish and aquatic in- <br />vertebrates has been studied [6], but none of the previously <br />tested fishes is closely related to Colorado squawfish. Because <br />of uncertainty of predicting the sensitivity of Colorado squaw- <br />fish to carbaryl and malathion, Beyers et al. [7] estimated <br />toxicity of these chemicals using 4-d renewal-acute and 32-d <br />early-life-stage (ELS) toxicity tests. Although these standard- <br />ized toxicity tests provided quantitative description of toxicant <br />effects, they did not simulate chemical exposure conditions <br />that may result from routine aerial pesticide applications. <br />Therefore, we studied brain AChE inhibition to estimate <br />toxicant effects at a scale consistent with the duration of ex- <br />posure and concentration range that may occur in the field. <br />AChE activity was measured in Colorado squawfish after <br />24-h in vivo exposure to technical carbaryl or malathion. <br />Data were analyzed using ANOYA and an alternative pro- <br />cedure utilizing a linear-plateau regression model. The ob- <br />jectives were to (a) estimate effect concentrations of AChE <br />inhibition and compare them to those for growth and sur- <br />vival of Colorado squawfish in 32-d ELS toxicity tests, and <br />(b) compare effect-concentration estimates obtained by the <br />two alternative statistical methods. <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />Experimental animals <br /> <br />Colorado squawfish were obtained from Dexter National <br />Fish Hatchery and Technology Center (Dexter, NM), Fish <br />were fed a mixture of live ::524-h-01d brine shrimp nauplii <br />(Aquarium Products, Glen Burnie, MD) and a commercially <br />prepared flake diet (TetraMin@; TetraWerke, Melle, Ger- <br />many) twice daily. <br /> <br />935 <br />