Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rlG-7 t) ~~h <br /> <br />Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116: 103-110. 1987 <br />@ Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1987 <br /> <br />t~<6 [ <br /> <br />Population Differentiation and Introgressive Hybridization <br />of the Flannelmouth Sucker and of Hatchery and <br />Native Stocks of the Razorback Sucker <br /> <br />DONALD G. BUTH <br /> <br />Department of Biology. University of California <br />Los Angeles. California 90024. USA <br /> <br />ROBERT W. MURPHY <br /> <br />Department of Ichthyology and Herpetology. Royal Ontario Museum <br />100 Queen's Park. Toronto. Ontario M5S 2C6. Canada <br /> <br />LINDA ULMER <br /> <br />California Department of Fish and Game <br />Post Ojfu:e Box BD. Blythe, California 92225. USA <br /> <br />Abstract. -lntrogressive hybridization has important management and evolutionary conse- <br />quences in regard to the maintenance of the integrity of gene pools and the acquisition of new <br />alleles by means other than mutation. Among North American cypriniform fishes, hybridization <br />often occurs between historically allopatric forms placed into sympatry via human activities and <br />between sympatric forms inhabiting a modified environment. In the Colorado River system, <br />several native catostomids are known to hybridize, including flannel mouth sucker Catostomus <br />latipinnis and razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus. AlIozymic data enabled direct quantification <br />of presumed introgression which was in the range of 0-5% toward flannel mouth sucker and 0-3% <br />toward razorback sucker. Levels of presumably introgressed genes in the stock of razorback sucker <br />from the Dexter Fish Hatchery were as low as or lower than those of the parental stock population <br />from Lake Mohave. <br /> <br />The razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus is a <br />merri!Jer of the "big-river" ichthyofaunal assem- <br />blage of the Colorado River basin whose decline <br />in recent years has gained attention and prompted <br />action to reverse this trend (Minckley 1983). The <br />historical and present distribution of razorback <br />sucker has been mapped by Holden (1980), to <br />which corrections and additions have been pro- <br />vided by Minckley (1983). The biology of this <br />species has been discussed by Minckley (1973, <br />1983), Moyle (1976), and Wick et aI. (1982). The <br />razorback sucker is recognized as a "vulnerable" <br />species (Williams et aI. 1985) whose management <br />and recovery has included large-scale artificial <br />propagation, which is currently based at the Dex- <br />ter Fish Hatchery, Dexter, New Mexico. <br />A problem regarding the management of any <br />fish species that is artificially mass-produced con- <br />cerns the maintenance of the natural gene pool <br />(Shaklee 1983). The parental stock chosen for the <br />mass production of offspring is, necessarily, a small <br />subsample of the total number of individuals in <br />the natural population. "Sampling error" resulting <br />in the enhancement of the frequencies of some <br />alleles and the reduction of others due to chance <br /> <br />can affect the hatchery population. This genetic <br />drift occurs in all natural populations, but has the <br />greatest influence on the genetic composition of <br />populations in which the effective breeding stock <br />is small, and is expected in hatchery situations. <br />Additional complications arise in the mainte- <br />nance of an independent gene pool for razorback <br />sucker due to the phenomenon of introgressive <br />hybridization. The razorback sucker is known to <br />hybridize with species of Catostomus in the Col- <br />orado River system, including flannelmouth suck- <br />er C. latipinnis. Sonora sucker C. insignis. and <br />Utah sucker C. ardens (Hubbs and Miller 1953; <br />Wick et al. 1982). Of these three species of Ca- <br />tostomus. the largest number of hybridization re- <br />ports involve flannelmouth sucker (Wick et al. <br />1982). The Dexter Hatchery breeding stock of ra- <br />zorback sucker was obtained from Lake Mohave, <br />one of the few locations where the species is locally <br />abundant (Minckley 1983). However, hybridiza- <br />tion with flannelmouth sucker in Lake Mohave <br />has been suspected, and doubts have thus been <br />cast on the genetic composition of the hatchery <br />stock of razorback sucker. The issue is not one of <br />generating a stock of razorback sucker that is any <br /> <br />103 <br />