My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7052
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:14:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7052
Author
Andrews, E. D. and J. M. Nelson
Title
Topographic Response of a Bar in the Green River, Utah to Variation in Discharge
USFW Year
1989
USFW - Doc Type
American Geophysical Union
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />r <br /> <br />468 <br /> <br />Topographic Response of a Oar <br /> <br />70 percent of the days with mean daily discharge greater than 510 m3/s during the <br />period from 1978 to 1986 occurred in 1983 and 1984. <br />The mean annual load of sand transported past the Jensen gage during the <br />period 1983 to 1986 was 2.7xl06 ton/yr, or more than 3 times the mean annual <br />quantity transported during the period immediately after the reservoir was <br />constructed, 1963 to 1982. The relatively large discharges and sediment transport <br />rates during the period from 1982 to 1986 ire comparable to the condition which <br />existed prior to the reservoir. <br />Changes in the Green River channel since the construction of Flaming Gorge <br />Reservoir must be deduced primarily from a comparison of large scale aerial <br />photographs (Andrews, 1986]. All of the Green River gages downstream from the <br />reservoir are ocated in stable reaches, where coarse gravel and cobble bed-material <br />as well as bedrock severely limit the adjustment of channel width and depth. <br />PuchereUi Jwritten communication, 1988] analyzed recent changes in bankfull <br />channel wi th as well as the number and area of islands in several reaches of the <br />Green River, using aerial photographs taken in 1963, 1974, 1978, and 1986. One of <br />the reaches he investigated extends approximately 18 km upstream from the mouth <br />of the Duchesne River, and includes our study reach. Average bankfull channel <br />width in this part of the Green River decreased from ...215 m to 189 m during the <br />period from 1964-78. During the subsequent period, 1978-86, however, bankfull <br />channel width increased to 198 m. <br />Although gradual accretion of bank material was common in the Green River <br />between 1964 and 1978, the most Sipificant process narrOwing the channel was <br />aggradation of channel bars, result1'llg in their attachment 1.0 the bank and <br />incorporation into the floodplain. In nearly all instances, thick vegetation became <br />established before the bar became attached. This narrowing of the channel since the <br />beginning of flow regulation appears to involve the same processes responsible for <br />forming the pre-reservoir floodplain. Inspection of the floodplain adjacent to the <br />study reach shows that it has been constructed by the aggregation of islands as well <br />as the gradual accretion of scroll bars. . <br />The remainder of this chapter will consider in detail the nature of flow and <br />sediment transport in the vicinity of a mid-channel bar. In addition, the evolution <br />of bar topography over time at various discharges will be described. Sand bars are <br />quite common in alluvial reaches of the Green River between the Jensen and Ouray <br />gages. The particular bar we have selected appears to be a typical example in every <br />way. The fluvial nature of this bar and associated reach will be investigated by <br />means of a fluid dynamic model, which will be described in the following section. <br /> <br />Model of Flow and Sediment Transport <br /> <br />The morphology of alluvial channels is ultimately the product of a strong <br />nonlinear coupling between channel geometry, the flow field in the channel, and the <br />transport of bed material by the flow. The first step in understanding the <br />development of channel topography IUld its response to viUiations in discharge is a <br />careful treatment of the various aspects of this coupling. The approach we have <br />taken treats the interactions between the flow; bed topography, and sediment <br />transport by combining three separate components of the full coupling, as follows: <br />(1) a flow algorithm capable of making accurate predictions of the velocity and <br />boundary shear stress fields in channels of known topography and planform, ill) a <br />method for determining sediment fluxes over the bed given the flow field, and 3) a <br />method for determining temporal changes in channel topography due to th <br />sediment transport and changes in stage. In this section, each of these three <br />components is briefly described, with emphasis on the physical effects which are <br />incorporated and, importantly, those which are neglected in our formulation. <br /> <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.