My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7052
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:14:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7052
Author
Andrews, E. D. and J. M. Nelson
Title
Topographic Response of a Bar in the Green River, Utah to Variation in Discharge
USFW Year
1989
USFW - Doc Type
American Geophysical Union
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />466 <br /> <br />Topographic Response of a Oar <br /> <br />'J <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br /> <br />24 26 <br /> <br />150 300 METERS <br />I I <br /> <br />Contour Int_. 1 Met. <br /> <br />Fig. 2. Channel topography or the Ouray reach. <br /> <br />160% of the bankfull value, unvegetated, sandy channel bars beoomeemergent and <br />\give the river a braided pattern within the bankfull channel. <br />~. In order to investigate the topographic response of channel bars to variations in <br />discharge, we selected a study reach about 10 channel widths _in lengths, located <br />within the Ouray National Wildlife Refuge 6.5 km upstream from the mouth of the <br />Duchesne River. Ten cross sections were established within the study reach and <br />resurveyed 5 times between July 1986 and Sept. 25, 1987. In addition, the water <br />discharge, suspended sediment concentration, and size and bed-material size were <br />determined each time the channel cross sections were surveyed. <br />A contour map of the study reach is shown in Figure 2. This topography was <br />generated from the initial survey on July 15-17, 1986, at a discharge of ",280 m3/s, <br />on the descending limb of a hydrograph which peaked at 620 m3/s 38 days <br />previously. A larger, primary channel lies on the left side of the bar and a smaller, <br />secondary channel lies to the right of the bar. The secondary channel is shallower <br />than the primary channel. Flow through the secondary channel ceases at a <br />discharge of 200 m3/s, when the water suiface is ",1.5 m below the bankfull stage. <br />The top of the bar lies about 1.2 m below the bankfull elevation and is free of any <br />vegetation. Furthermore, the bar surface is generally clear of large debris, such as <br />logs or tree stumps, as well as coarse bed-material. Thus, large obstructions in the <br />flow do not appear to influence the stability of the bar. A comparison of available <br />aerial photographs shows that this bar has existed since 1962 with roughly the same <br />configuration and location. <br />The channel of the Green River in the vicinity of the study reach appears to be <br />typical of alluvial reaches between the Jensen gage and the mouth of the Duchesne <br />River. Although the study reach is located 14 km upstream from the Ouray gage, <br />daily water discharge and suspended sediment concentration determined at the <br />Jensen gage, 90 km upstream, provide a much more accurate description of flow and <br />sediment transport in the study reach than does the record of the Ouray gage. <br />Tributary inflow to the reach between the Jensen gage and the study reach is very <br />small. The Duchesne River, drainage area ",11,000 km2, and White River, drainage <br />area ",13,300 km2, represent 93 percent of the difference in drainage area between <br />the Jensen and Ouray gage, and join the Green River downstream from the study <br />reach. Therefore, the record of the Jensen gage will be used to describe the <br />variations of flow and sediment transport which have occurred in the study reach <br />over the past 40 years. <br />Andrews [19861 provided a detailed description of the effects of reservoir <br />regulations upon ffow and sediment transport in the Green River basin, including <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.