Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />480 <br /> <br />Topographic Response of a Bar <br /> <br />DISTANCE FROM CENTERLINE [M] <br />0.0 <br /> <br />-1250 <br /> <br />125.0 <br />U.O <br />1.0 <br />2.0 <br />3.0 <br />4.0 <br />5.0 <br />6.0 <br /> <br /> <br /> 00 <br /> 1.0 <br /> 2.0 <br /> 3.0 <br /> 4.0 <br /> 5.0 16 <br /> 60 <br /> 125.0 0.0 -125.0 <br />~ 0.0 <br />"T'" 1.0 <br />!i: 2.0 <br />t:J 3.0 <br />0 <br /> 4.0 <br /> 5.0 <br /> 6.0 <br /> 0.0 <br /> 1.0 <br /> 2.0 <br /> 3.0 <br /> 4.0 <br /> 5.0 <br /> 6.t <br /> 0.0 <br /> 1.0 <br /> 2.0 <br /> 3.0 <br /> 4.0 <br /> 5.0 <br /> 6.0 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Fig. 8. Predicted evolution of bar topography at 5 cross sections during a discharge of 475 <br />m3fs for 2 day~. Dashed line sbows original topography and solid line shows rmal . <br />topography. <br /> <br />slowly in the secondary channel. The bar surface erodes slowly in the vicinity of <br />cross section 18. Further downstream, however, erosion of the bar surface ceases, <br />and a significant quantity of sediment accumulates over the apex of the bar. <br />Model calculations using a discharge of 475 m3/s indicate that the bar <br />topography is enhanced appreciably by flow near the bankfull stage. Sediment <br />accumulates on the bar surface and is eroded from the side channels, except in the <br />