Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />476 Topographic Response of a Oar <br /> 5.0 0 0 <br /> 0 0 17 <br /> 4.0 <br /> 3.0 <br /> 2.0 <br /> 1.0 <br /> 0.0 <br /> 'U' 5.0 <br /> tLI <br /> .~ 40 13 <br /> . <br /> 6 0 <br /> tLI 3.0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0:: <br /> c( <br /> :c 2.0 <br /> U <br /> C/) <br /> C 1.0 0 00 <br /> !:: 00 0 <br /> Z <br /> => 0.0 <br /> 5.0 <br /> 8 <br /> 4.0 <br /> 3.0 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 2.0 <br /> 1.0 000000000 0 <br /> 0 0 <br /> 0.0 <br /> 125.0 0.0 -125.0 <br /> DISTANCE FROM CENTERUNE [M] <br />Fig. 6. Comparison of measured and computed lateral distribution of unit discharge at cross <br /> sections 8, 13, 17, 23, 31 and 34 in the Ouray reach. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />lateral distribution of sediment transport rate is neatly uniform at both. 275 m3fs <br />and 475 m3fs. Over the apex of the bar near cross section 19, however, the lateral <br />distribution of sediment transport is strongly asymmetrical near the bankfull <br />discharge. As discharge decreases, the sediment transport field over the bar <br />becomes increasingly more asymmetrical and the cross channel component of the <br />sediment transport field increases. <br /> <br />Comparison of Measured and Computed Unit Discharge <br /> <br />The computed and measured unit discharges are in very good agreement through <br />the Ouray reach. This comparison is shown in figure 6, where the lateral <br />