Laserfiche WebLink
<br />December 2008 <br /> <br />Bestgen et aL-Ecology of Gi/fl e/egans <br /> <br />491 <br /> <br />TABLE I-Number, me,m totallength (mm) and range (in parentheses), and stocking dates and locations for <br />bony tails (Gila elegans) released in the Green River study area, Colorado and Utah (river km 597-554.6), 2002- <br />2005. Fish were produced at the John W. Mumma Native Aquatic Species Restoration Facility, Colorado Division of <br />'Wildlife, Alamosa, Colorado. Bony tails recaptured or obseIVed were all from fish stocked the same year, <br /> <br /> Year <br />Locality 2002 2003 2004 2005 <br />Brovms Park (river km 597) 8,600 <br />Mean total length 224 (119-351) <br /> 4 October <br />Recaptured 1 <br />Echo Park (river km 554.6) 5,000 1,592 6,6EiO 2,580 <br />Mean total length 209 210 (156-332) 229 (143-596) 234 (180-365) <br /> 10 October 7 October 12 and 16 September 10 June <br />Recaptured or obseIVed 0 0 84+ 45 <br /> <br />1988 and 1989. Of the 86 bony tails released to <br />obtain habitat-use information, 64 fish (74%) <br />were documented mortalities. p, V. Badame and <br />]. M. Hudson (in litt.) had slightly higher <br />recapture success in 1996-2001, when larger <br />numbers offish were stocked; 0.8% (n = 663) of <br />bonytails stocked in the Colorado River (n = <br />84,603) were recaptured and 0.02% (n = 17) <br />had over-wintered ~6 months. In the Green <br />River, 0.4% (n = 523) of bony tails stocked (n = <br />127,714) were recaptured and 0.05% (n = 59) <br />had over-\\Iintered ~6 months. Most fish released <br />were relatively small (82% < 140 mm total <br />length), and most recaptures were of larger fish, <br />which led them to recommend stocking of fish <br />~300 mm in total length. <br />Many bony tails captured in September 2005 <br />had multiple Lernea infections or fungus, and <br />their general appearance, color, and condition <br />was poor. The ANCOVA of weight as a function <br />of length between bony tails recaptured in 2004 <br />(weight = -255.9 + totallength*1.54, F = 79.0, <br />df I, 19, P < 0.001, y2 = 0.81) and those in 2005 <br />(weight = -328.9 + totallength*1.74, F = 175.0, <br />df I, 35, P < 0.001, y2 = 0.83) did not detect a <br />significant group-length interaction term (F = <br />0.67, P = 0.420), but there was a significant <br />difference among intercepts (F = 12.81, P < <br />0.001), After correcting for differences in lengths <br />of bonytails for samples in 2004 and 2005 (mean <br />= 261 mm total length), least-squares means <br />suggested bony tails captured soon after stocking <br />in 2004 were 17% heavier (147 g) than those <br />recaptured 4 months after release in 2005 <br />(126 g). Using a length:weight relationship <br />developed for wild bonytails Vanicek and Kramer <br /> <br />(1969), predicted weight for an average 261-mm- <br />long fish was 132 g, which was slightly heavier <br />than bony tails recaptured in Septem bel' 2005 <br />that were at large 4 months but less than just- <br />stocked fish recaptured in September 2004. <br />Bonytails recaptured by electrofishing in Au- <br />gust 2005 grew an average of 11.6-mm total <br />length (1-20 mm) following their release in <br />June, which was similar to the rate of growth of <br />10.4 mm in total length for smaller bony tails <br />(mean total length = 124-130 mm, 1996-1998 <br />year classes) observed by P. V. Badame and]. M. <br />Hudson (in litt.) over a 58-70 day period. <br />Bony tails recaptured in our study in September <br />2005 and 4-months post-release grew an average <br />of 29.5 mm in total length (7-55 mm). SimiIar- <br />sized age-4 wild bonytails (mean = 258 mm total <br />length) had an average annual growth increment <br />of 89 mm in total length (Vanicek and Kramer, <br />1969). Reduced condition of bonytails at large <br />for 4 months relative to just-stocked fish and <br />relatively slow growth rates of stocked bony tails <br />in 2005 compared to wild fish may indicate <br />stocked fish are not able to acquire adequate <br />food, which likely contributed to susceptibility to <br />disease and other stressors. <br />Bonytails captured or observed in 2004 and <br />2005 were mostly collected in eddies and pools <br />1-3-m deep, but also used backwaters and swifter <br />runs and riffles with current velocity ::SO.7 m/s. <br />Bon}tails from riffles in 2004 apparently were <br />feeding, as several fish excreted algae and insect <br />parts during post-capture handling. P. V.Ba- <br />dame and J. M. Hudson (in litt.) also found <br />bon}'tails using a wide variety of habitat types, <br />with smaller (mean total length = 95 IllIll) <br />