Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Inc.rease <br /> <br />Water Supply <br /> <br />Don't Allocate <br /> <br />.Shortages. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Los Angeles <br />suggests a bold <br />plan to bolster an <br />over-burdened <br />Colorado River the <br />better to serve <br />a three-state area <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />By SAMUEL B. NELSON, General Manager and Chief Engineer <br />Department of Water and Power, Los Angeles, Calif. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />- I <br />,.-..-..-.......6.-...- .__.._ <br />j <br />i <br />I <br />11- <br />; <br />~. <-' <br />\. <br />\ <br />'- <br />\ <br />\. <br />\. <br />\ <br />'- <br />\. <br />\ <br />\. <br />'- <br />\ <br />\. <br /> <br />R <br /> <br />EGO N <br /> <br />"-..-. <br />--"- <br /> <br />S"iR""E1no <br /> <br />("I <br />-<;J <br />( <br /> <br />./ <br />A'\ <br /> <br />o <br />~ <br />1- <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />\. <br />....., <br /> <br />t..,.. '-'_"_ <br />.,-......._..-.._..1"'..1 <br />i <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />1-1 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />L- <br /> <br />i <br />i <br />i <br />_..~_.._.._..---i <br /> <br />, j <br />! L____.._ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />: UTA H <br />i <br />i <br />, <br /> <br />~_.._.._.._..- <br />I <br /> <br />-<;J <br /><::> <br /> <br />-<;J <br /> <br />./ <br /> <br />-<;J <br /> <br />A RI ZONA <br /> <br />PHOENIX <br />@I <br /> <br />The proposed 519-mile aqueduct running from the Snake River <br />through eastern Nevada to lake Mead would guarantee full <br />utilization of the Colorado River Aqueduct plus ample <br />water for the proposed Central Arizona Project <br />and other planned developments in Nevada. <br /> <br />96 <br /> <br />-'I <br /> <br />. The Los Angeles Department of <br />Water and Power believes that it is <br />far more. practical to increase a <br />water supply, where pos~ible, than <br />to allocate the shortage. In our <br />case, borrowing from a river having <br />surplus water to m~ <br />hClencv of an alrea ed <br />river appears to be the best solu- <br />tIOn. <br />The Suoreme Court's decisiQD <br />clearing the way for Arizona to u1c <br />an additional 1,200,000 acre-feet of <br />Colorado River water annually for <br />its Central Arizona nroiect force- <br />fully awakened the Southwest to,thc <br />need for a regional water plan. The <br />decision limits California to 4,400,- <br />000 acre-feet of water from the <br />Colorado River on the basis of an <br />annual supply of 7,500,000 acre- <br />feet of mainstream water in the <br />lower Colorado basin, Estimat~ <br />place the minimum effect of thc <br />Coures decisIon ~t ~ TPnnrtlnn cl <br />about 662.000 acre-feet per vear, <br />or more than 50% in thp future <br />flow of the Metrooolitan Water Dis- <br />trIct's (MWD) Co]or~dn Rivcr <br />Aaueduct <br />The impact of this decision als,' <br />brought into sharp focus the lon~- <br />known fact that there simnlv is nl'.! <br />enough water in the Colorado ~i~:~r <br />to meet the demands of eXlsU~f <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson outlined the proposed Sn:l~' <br />Colorado project in a talk 00 water sUI>- <br />ply at the Los Angeles Conference (}ll <br />the Super-City of Tomorrow. <br /> <br />March 1965 . THE AMERICAN CITY <br />