My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4201
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
4201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:14:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
4201
Author
Anonymous.
Title
Controversy in the Mid '60's
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Unsolved Questions.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />according to Southwestern water experts. <br />is to ~nO'mp.nt Mlnntt "f thQ rnlnrann <br />River and its tributaries. They say there <br />are three ways to do this: <br />1. Importation. This would involve <br />brin~n~ water into the Colorado River <br />Bas' t om some other river hasin. The <br />most logical SOurce would be the Colum- <br />bia in the Northwest. <br />2. DesaltiDl!. Power from nuclear re- <br />actors, it is hoped, will become cheap <br />enough. to distill water from the Pacific <br />and pump it inland to desert regions. <br />3. Weather modification. It is held <br />that the West, WIth Its wide open spaces~ <br />is an. ideal place to develop the art of <br />precipitating more water from the sky. <br />Technologies questioned. At the <br />moment, many water experts question <br />whether technologies of desalting and <br />rain-making are advanced enough to sup- <br />ply water in the quantity needed in the <br />Southwest. Representative James A. <br />Haley (Dem.), of Florida, told his South- <br />western colleagues bluntly on February 1: <br />"We might as well quit kidding <br />around. You have got to go somewhere <br />and steal enough water to meet your <br />problem on the Colorado, and the only <br />place you can get the amount of water <br />you need is from the Columbia River." <br />Representative Craig Hosmer (Rep.), <br />of California, cited figures showing that <br />large quantities of Columbia River water <br />flow unused into the Pacific Ocean every <br />year. <br />But Congressmen from the four States <br />of the Columbia Basin':"'Oregon, Washing- <br />ton, Idaho, and Montana-are guarding <br />their water hole jealously. They maintain <br />that their States have only begun to grow <br />and may well need the water of the Col- <br />umbia to assure future development. <br />Idaho officials are especially alarmed. <br />The Snake River, a major tributary of <br />the Columbia, arcs across southern Idaho. <br />It has become a favorite target of South- . <br />western water experts because it offers a <br />relatively short route for diversion of <br />water to the Colorado River. <br />Vow to fight. Says Idaho Senator <br />Len B. Jordan: <br />"When it comes to guarding the <br />Snake, we are going to fight to the last <br />man. Idaho has more fertile land than <br />can be irrigated by the Snake. Why <br />should we give our water to the South- <br />westr <br />Montana finds itself threatened from <br />two directions. West of the Continental <br />Divide, its water flows down into the <br />Columbia Basin. To the east, it flows <br /> <br />Columbia River. Diversion of just a small part of the flaw of this mighty river to <br />the Southwest is seen by States in that region as solution to water crisis. <br /> <br />into the ~Iissouri Basin. Comments <br />James Murphy, Montana's representative <br />on the Pacific Northwest River Basins <br />Commission: <br />"Montana has always had so much wa- <br />ter that few people ever believed until <br />a few years ago that we could run out. <br />Now, 'they are beginning to wake up to <br />the fact that we had better nail down <br />what remains to assure our own future." <br />Far away, in Texas, officials are eying <br />both the Mississippi and the Missouri <br />rivers as possible sources to keep an <br />irrigated farm economy booming in west <br />Texas. <br />One plan is to take water from the <br />Mississippi River and pump it up to <br />around 4,000 feet in west Texas. That <br />suggestion has evoked cries of protest <br />from States along the Mississippi. <br />Missouri proposal. Now another <br />pl::an invnlvinrr thp Nfi~~nllri Rivpr i<: hp_ <br />in'{ ::U'lvnt""~tp(l hv ~pn~tnT Tnhn Tnw~r, <br />Texas Reoublican. This would invoh:e <br />t~ing into the Missow:i at Fort Ran- <br />d Dam near the border between Ne- <br />braska and South Dakota. Details have <br />been laid down in a blueprint by R. W. <br />Beck and Associates, consulting engi- <br />neers in Denver. <br />The Beck proposal has features attrac- <br />tive to several States of this region. <br />Water from tbe Missouri would be <br />pumped to western Nebraska. Thence it <br />would flow through a river-sized. canal <br />across the Great Plains, dropping off <br />water for use in Nebraska. Colorado, <br />Kansas, Oklahoma, western Texas and <br />eastern New Mexico. <br />This idea has received a cold recep- <br />tion in States along the Missouri River- <br />especially in the two Dakotas. <br /> <br />-38- <br /> <br />North Dakota has just launched a proj- <br />ect to irrigate 250,000 acres out of the <br />reservoir behind Garrison Dam on the <br />Missouri. Meanwhile, South Dakota is <br />seeking congressional approval to bring <br />water to 190,000 acres from the Oahe <br />Dam reservoir. <br />Colorado's stand. A striking exam- <br />ple of how proposals of one State can <br />trigger sharp reaction in another State of <br />this Western region is seen in Colorado's <br />stand on the Central Arizona Project. <br />Colorado has entered an uneasy alli- <br />ance with California. This alliance is <br />based on agreement that any bill author- <br />izing works for Arizona will also lay <br />groundwork for augmentation of water <br />supplies in the. Colorado Basin. <br />Coloradans want to hold more water <br />in headwaters of the Colorado River to <br />assure growth of their State. <br />A special problem, shared by Colora- <br />do, Utah and Wyoming, is finding water <br />needed for future development of exten- <br />sive oil-shale deposits. <br />Utah Senator Frank E.. Moss (Oem.) <br />is urging the most ambitious plan of <br />all to ease the Western water shortages. <br />This is the North American Water and <br />Power Alliance, which would bring vast <br />amounts of water down from Canada. <br />New Mexico, two years ago, won its <br />fight with Arizona for inclusion of Hook- <br />er Dam in bills authorizing works on <br />the Colorado and its tributaries. This <br />dam would impound water of the Gila <br />River for use in mining developments in <br />the southwestern part of New Mexico. <br />The bitter fight over the Colorado <br />River stems from the fact that more <br />promises have been made for its runoff <br />than the river can fulfill. In 1922, water <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.