My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7393
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7393
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:14:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7393
Author
Harrington, W.
Title
Endangered Species Protection and Water Resource Development.
USFW Year
1980.
USFW - Doc Type
LA-8278-MS,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />position on this question, and until further information becomes available, <br />will evidently attempt to prevent any additional diminution of streamflow in <br />this reach of the Platte. <br /> <br />C. The Economic Issue: The Distribution of Water <br />The Grayrocks Case was not simply a case of development versus preserva- <br />tion; one also found conflicts within the set of economic interests and even <br />within the set of environmental interests. Although some were settled by the <br />court case and the subsequent compromise, others were not, perhaps destined to <br />flare up again at a later tUne. <br />The prine iple interests in the case and those that participated in the <br />compromise are: <br />(1) Missouri Basin Power Project. The utilities wanted to finish con- <br />struction and begin operation as quickly and as cheaply as possible. <br />(2) The State of Nebraska. Nebraska water users feared that additional <br />consumption on the Laramie would reduce the flow of the Platte, thus jeopardi- <br />zing their water rights. Despite this, Nebraska's interest was not monolithic. <br />The state Fish and Game Commision supported the downstream environmental cases <br />(see 3 below). Furthermore, it must be noted that the city of Lincoln was a <br />prominent participant in MBPP. <br />(3) Downstream environmental interests. The preservation of whooping <br />crane habitat was championed by two national environmental organizations: the <br />National Wildlife Federation and the National Audubon Society. In addition, <br />there was a more local interest in preserving the self-sustaining trout fishery <br />in Lake McConaughy. These two interests shared the goal of minimizing water <br />consumption in Wyoming, although they are competitors for water in Nebraska. <br />(4) Upstream environmental interests. A coalition of environmentalists <br />and ranches in Wyoming, led by the Powder River Basin Resource Council and the <br />Laramie River Water Users Association, wanted nothing less than to defeat <br />Grayrocks al together. The prospect of rapid growth of energy produc tion in <br />Wyoming, as in a number of Western states, is resented by many. <br />(5) The Federal Government. There are numerous federal interests in <br />this case. The Rural Electrification Administration wishes to see the plant <br />built. The Corps of Engineers would like to see the dam built. The Fish and <br />Wildlife Service must ensure that the whooping cranes are protected. The FWS, <br />while not a party to the final agreement, played a role in shaping it and in <br /> <br />(wi <br />D fc. ~t1Q <br />d~... <br />i)o;J <br /> <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.