Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the reservoirs. As shown, after Pathfinder Dam was built, average yearly peak <br />flowed declined by 50%, while average flow declined by only 18%. And yet, <br />after McConaughy and Seminoe were added, both peak and average flow dropped by <br />about 70% j after Glendo, both peak and average flow increased by about the <br />same percent. In each case, the decline measured in absolute terms rather <br />than percentages was much greater for peak flows. <br />Of course, at 104 000 acre-ft Grayrocks Reservoir is considerably smaller <br />than any of those listed in Table Ij moreover, the Laramie contributes only <br />about 17% of the flow of the North Platte at the state line. Accordingly, the <br />averaging effects of this reservoir on peak flows in the North Platte are <br />likely to be small. On the other hand, Lake McConaughy, the largest of the <br />four reservoirs of Table I, lies between Grayrocks and the critical habitat. <br />If flows into the lake are reduced, average reservoir level will drop, provid- <br />ing more room to store peak flows. Thus, even if the operating rules of Lake <br />McConaughy remain unchanged, peak flows may well decline more than average <br />flows, even on a percentage basis. <br />To summarize, the completion of MBPP is likely to reduce average flows in <br />the critical habitat by about 3%. The reduction in peak flow is difficult to <br />determine, both in absolute and percentage terms. Such a decline in flow rate <br />at first glance does not seem very significant, especially because of the sub- <br />stantial variation already found in daily flows. However, Grayrocks is only <br />one of several planned projects that use water from the Platte River, and the <br />cumulative effect of these other projects in addition to Grayrocks was an <br />important issue in the case. The proper way of dealing with this question of <br />cumulative effects is beyond the scope of this section, but we will return to <br />it later. <br />3. Reduced flows in the Platt~ will allow the encroachment of tall vege- <br />tation in the channel of the river. Unquestionably, the past century has seen <br />a severe decline in the channel width of the Platte. Large areas over part of <br />the Platte River channel once nearly devoid of vegetation are now overgrown <br />with shrubs and young cottonwood trees, and are on that account unsuitable <br />habitat for both sandhill and whooping cranes. On the basis of old photographs <br />and the measurements of 19th century explorers, Williams (1978) has estimated <br />that current channel widths at various points are only 5 to 40% of what they <br />were 80 to 100 years ago. These declines have been particularly severe up- <br />stream of the critical habitat. At Brady, for example, the decline has been <br /> <br />36 <br />