Laserfiche WebLink
<br />For two of these cases, the endangered species was not known to inhabit <br />the area before the project was begun. (In fact, the two species were not <br />even known to exist.) As noted, the Furbish lousewort was discovered during <br />the preparation of the EIS for the Dickey-Lincoln project. The snail darter <br />was discovered in 1973, well after construction of the Tellico Dam had started. <br />This suggests that there is indeed some chance that a given project will be <br />affected by the discovery of a species unknown at the start of the project, <br />although in neither of the cases cited were the species in question discovered <br />by environmental groups using the Act as a tool to halt development. <br />In six of these eight cases, a water resource development project was <br />involved; the threat to endangered species was either too much water (inunda- <br />tion of critical habitat) or not enough (streamflow depletion) as follows: <br /> <br />Inundation <br /> <br />M~amec Dam (Indiana bat) <br />Dickey-Lincoln Dams (Furnish lousewort) . ~Dr.. <br />Tellico Dam (snail darter) -1' ~YlJ> <br />Juniper Dam (Colorado Squawfish),- /rNfi .,. ...~:~.'..'. . \ <br />ck,"y~ ! ! :rr. <br /> <br />\ <br />t i tJ" <br />!, c\ ,""- <br />U. tl~{ ~ <br /> <br />Depletion <br /> <br />Grayrocks Dam (whooping crane) <br />Warner Valley (wound fin) . <br /> <br />The distinction between inundation and depletion is important for three <br />reasons. First, all the cases involving inundation evidently resulted in ir- <br />resolvable conflicts, whereas for the cases involving depletion, a compromise <br /> <br />has been reached or is apparently within reach. This is not at all surprising <br /> <br />because even "a little" inundation implies a complete change of habitat (from <br /> <br />terrestrial or riverine to lacustrine). Conflicts between such developments <br /> <br />,.r.:A :\'\ f d h b" . ... 1 * <br />'~vr 'an a l.tat preservatl.on are absolute and l.ndl.vl.sl.b e. On the other hand, <br />,~,}t <br />f\~ J\1Ji the impacts of projects that reduce flows are marginal, and for this reason <br />\,' ..-\:5 <br />LV \u~~ much more amenable to compromise. <br />\I'" \ \. <br /> <br />A second important difference between inundation and depletion is the <br />amount of certainty that attaches to the impact of development on species sur- <br /> <br />viva 1. <br /> <br />Inundation drastically alters habitat with complete certainty. The <br /> <br />*This is not entirely true. One of the alternatives proposed for the Tellico <br />Project was to operate it as a dry dam, which some felt would allow the species <br />to be preserved and some of the benefits of the dam to be realized. <br /> <br />16 <br />