My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8105
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 5:14:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8105
Author
Haines, G. B., D. W. Beyers and T. Modde.
Title
Estimation of Winter Survival, Movement and Dispersal of Young Colorado Squawfish in the Green River, Utah.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Recovery Program Project 36,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Methods <br /> <br />Capture-Recapture Population Estimates <br />Fish capture and marking. - The abundance of young- of-year Colorado squawfish in <br />autumn and the following spring was estimated using capture-recapture population estimation <br />methods (Otis et al. 1978; Seber 1982; Haines and Modde 1996). Study sites were sampled on <br />three occasions (passes) for each population estimate. A pass consisted of seining all backwaters <br />with surface area 2: 3 m2 within each study reach. Seines were 4.5-m long x 1.9-m deep with 4.0- <br />mm bar mesh. The area seined was generally between 70 and 100% of the of the total surface <br />area. In the Jensen reach, however, a few backwaters were large and deep and only about 50% of <br />the total area could be seined. The number of seine hauls per backwater averaged 2-3 for the <br />Canyonlands reach and ranged from 1 to 6; the backwaters in the Jensen reach were somewhat <br />larger and the number of seine hauls per backwater averaged 3-5 and ranged from 1 to 23. The <br />backwaters were not blocked prior to seining. Colorado squawfish were marked on the first two <br />passes but not on the third, with one exception: in autumn 1992 fish were marked only on the <br />first pass. Dates of each sampling pass are given in Appendix 1. <br />Captured Colorado squawfish < 100-mm total length (TL) were anesthetized with 0.1 g/L <br />MS-222 and marked with syringe-injected elastomer (Northwest Marine Technology, Shaw <br />Island, Washington). Approximately 100 fish (if available) were selected at random and <br />measured (TL) during each population estimate. Fish were allowed to recover in a 20-L pail of <br />river water for 20 to 30 min while seining, marking, and data collection were completed. <br />Marked fish were released into backwaters where they were captured. On seven occasions <br />postmarking survival was estimated by retaining marked fish ovemight (18 to 19 h) in a floating <br />enclosure. <br /> <br />Captur~d Colorado squawfish > 100 mm TL were not considered part of the age-O cohort. <br />These fish were measured (TL), marked with intemally implanted passive integrated transponder <br />(PIT) tags (Prentice et al. 1990) and released back into the same backwater. <br />Parameter estimates. - Population estimates were calculated using the computer <br />program CAPTURE (White et al. 1982) assuming closed capture-recapture models (Otis et al. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.