Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Methods <br /> <br />Capture-Recapture Population Estimates <br />Fish capture and marking. - The abundance of young- of-year Colorado squawfish in <br />autumn and the following spring was estimated using capture-recapture population estimation <br />methods (Otis et al. 1978; Seber 1982; Haines and Modde 1996). Study sites were sampled on <br />three occasions (passes) for each population estimate. A pass consisted of seining all backwaters <br />with surface area 2: 3 m2 within each study reach. Seines were 4.5-m long x 1.9-m deep with 4.0- <br />mm bar mesh. The area seined was generally between 70 and 100% of the of the total surface <br />area. In the Jensen reach, however, a few backwaters were large and deep and only about 50% of <br />the total area could be seined. The number of seine hauls per backwater averaged 2-3 for the <br />Canyonlands reach and ranged from 1 to 6; the backwaters in the Jensen reach were somewhat <br />larger and the number of seine hauls per backwater averaged 3-5 and ranged from 1 to 23. The <br />backwaters were not blocked prior to seining. Colorado squawfish were marked on the first two <br />passes but not on the third, with one exception: in autumn 1992 fish were marked only on the <br />first pass. Dates of each sampling pass are given in Appendix 1. <br />Captured Colorado squawfish < 100-mm total length (TL) were anesthetized with 0.1 g/L <br />MS-222 and marked with syringe-injected elastomer (Northwest Marine Technology, Shaw <br />Island, Washington). Approximately 100 fish (if available) were selected at random and <br />measured (TL) during each population estimate. Fish were allowed to recover in a 20-L pail of <br />river water for 20 to 30 min while seining, marking, and data collection were completed. <br />Marked fish were released into backwaters where they were captured. On seven occasions <br />postmarking survival was estimated by retaining marked fish ovemight (18 to 19 h) in a floating <br />enclosure. <br /> <br />Captur~d Colorado squawfish > 100 mm TL were not considered part of the age-O cohort. <br />These fish were measured (TL), marked with intemally implanted passive integrated transponder <br />(PIT) tags (Prentice et al. 1990) and released back into the same backwater. <br />Parameter estimates. - Population estimates were calculated using the computer <br />program CAPTURE (White et al. 1982) assuming closed capture-recapture models (Otis et al. <br /> <br />5 <br />